https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
On 11/8/23 03:09, manolis.tsamis at vrull dot eu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415
>
> --- Comment #15 from Manolis Tsamis ---
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
>>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107114
Bug ID: 107114
Summary: [13 Regression] Failure to discover range results in
bogus warning
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106679
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107046
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
First, let's not focus too much on that specific test. There's others:
Tests that now fail, but worked before (20 tests):
rx-sim: gcc.c-torture/execute/ieee/hugeval.c execution, -O1
rx-sim:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107046
Bug ID: 107046
Summary: [13 Regression] Recent FP range work causing inf-2 to
be miscompiled on rx-elf
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106958
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com
---