[Bug ada/114710] New: Temporary object finalized too late

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jhb.chat at gmail dot com CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 57940 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57940&action=edit temporrary finalized too late Versio

[Bug ada/114708] New: Creating access to an incomplete formal in a generic package sometimes causes GNAT to crash

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jhb.chat at gmail dot com CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 57939 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug ada/114593] New: Failed type conversion on non-tagged derived type inside a generic unit

: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jhb.chat at gmail dot com CC: dkm at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 57880 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #8 from Jere --- OH! I thought you meant here. I wasn't sure this was the same bug internally. They have different results in the two different versions of GNAT. The AdaCore GNAT Community put out a crash report while the FSF GNAT

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #5 from Jere --- Created attachment 44140 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44140&action=edit combined ada files in (hopefully) gnatchop friendly format

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #4 from Jere --- I only filed the report here once (at least purposely). The website was laggy when I submitted so perhaps it got submitted twice accidentally? My side of the interface only shows 2 bugs from me that are completely d

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #2 from Jere --- I was unable to attach main.s, which was generated using -v and -save-temps The attachment submitter said it could not attach it because it was empty.

[Bug ada/85760] Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85760 --- Comment #1 from Jere --- Created attachment 44123 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44123&action=edit Test Case 1 This is a test case used to reproduce the crash. Crashes in 7.2, 7.3, and GPL 2017

[Bug ada/85760] New: Using generic function to initialize a type created by a generic package crashes GNAT

Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jhb.chat at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: Windows 10 msys2 mingw64 Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 given a package, Wrappers.ads

[Bug ada/84142] Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84142 --- Comment #1 from Jere --- Created attachment 43302 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43302&action=edit zip archive containing 3 separate causes

[Bug ada/84142] New: Implicit_Dereference with Generic Formal Incomplete Types

Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jhb.chat at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Host: Windows 10 mingw64 from MSYS2 Target: x86_64-w64-mingw32 I've found a few different ways to crash GNAT usin