: Binding for pthread_sigmask not same as other ports
Product: gcc
Version: 4.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: joel at oarcorp dot
--- Comment #1 from joel at oarcorp dot com 2007-07-05 18:30 ---
Created an attachment (id=13853)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13853action=view)
Patch to make this file compile
With this patch, I have been able to successfully compile GNAT for 7 target
--- Comment #7 from joel at oarcorp dot com 2007-05-06 17:00 ---
It is definitely a regression against 4.1.2. It is probably a regession
against 4.0. We have been compiling this code with the same compile options
since September 2006 using the latest gcc releases possible
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-08-19 16:02
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 regression] ICE with soft-float on
m68k
Why did you turn this from m68k-* to m68k-rtems?
It was reported against m68k-rtems but would have
be duplicated on at least m68k-elf if not any
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-05-18 13:23
---
Subject: Re: Cross-building gnat-4.0.0 requires native gnat-4.0.0
charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From charlet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18
07:43 ---
Right
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-05-16 14:00
---
Subject: Re: Segfault while compiling
libgfortran/intrinsics/selected_int_kind.f90
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-14
08:33
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-09 12:44
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at twcny dot rr dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From neroden at twcny dot rr dot com 2005-02-09
07:13 ---
Subject: Re: gnat tools
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-08 19:16
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-08
18:30 ---
Is a fix likely to get into 4.0
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-07 22:41
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
laurent at guerby dot net wrote:
--- Additional Comments From laurent at guerby dot net 2005-02-06 10:02
---
(In reply to comment #19)
Nathanel I
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-08 00:01
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-07
23:15 ---
Closing. Laurent, I may ask you
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-03 12:24
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-03
00:57 ---
Joel, I'm suspicious
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:23
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-29
22:19 ---
You may try adding a gnattools
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-31 15:24
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
charlet at adacore dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-01-31 09:21
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-02-01 00:46
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable cross
charlet at adacore dot com wrote:
--- Additional Comments From charlet at adacore dot com 2005-01-31 16:38
---
Subject: Re: gnat tools not buildable
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2005-01-28 12:24
---
Subject: Re: LINK_GCC_C_SEQUENCE_SPEC doesn't play nice
with RTEMS
ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-28
08:16 ---
IMO
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-24 15:50
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 Regression] fixincludes breaks RTEMS
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-24
15:02 ---
(In reply to comment
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-18 14:13
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression
as operand
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
13:14
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-18 14:26
---
Subject: Re: [3.4 only] ICE: output_operand: invalid expression
as operand
corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From corsepiu at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-18
13:14
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 14:56 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-03 23:44 ---
Even the 68020 should
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 16:37 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-04 15:12 ---
My copy of the 68060 user
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-04 19:11 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-04 16:53 ---
You can't just increase
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 21:09 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
--- Additional Comments From bkoz at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-03 00:12
---
Joel, you
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 22:56 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
schwab at suse dot de wrote:
--- Additional Comments From schwab at suse dot de 2004-11-03 22:25 ---
On the m68k the biggest
--- Additional Comments From joel at oarcorp dot com 2004-11-03 23:25 ---
Subject: Re: M68060 fails with libstdc++-v3/config/cpu/m68k/atomicity.h
cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au wrote:
--- Additional Comments From cjohns at cybertec dot com dot au 2004-11-03 23:05
24 matches
Mail list logo
