[Bug tree-optimization/100494] [11/12 Regression] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-06-16 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #11 from J.M. Eubank --- Confirmed that building with a larger default stack size on Windows works to bootstrap GCC and binutils and dependencies - I chose -Wl,--stack=10485760 (10 MiB) but probably 2-4 MiB would be sufficient.

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] [11/12 Regression] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-06-15 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #9 from J.M. Eubank --- > I am unfamiliar with what mitigations/flags the compiler has for trying to > control this. It would certainly be possible to monitor the call depth and > cease at a certain point, but Im not sure what nee

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] [11/12 Regression] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-06-15 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #7 from J.M. Eubank --- Created attachment 51024 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51024&action=edit sha1.c.038t.evrp.gz > Does the compilation not finish? or just take ma very long time? On the > other targets

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] [11/12 Regression] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-06-15 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #5 from J.M. Eubank --- Unfortunately it doesn't seem to have made a difference in this case. x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -c -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -O2 -g -D__USE_MINGW_ACCESS -I. -I/crossdev/src/binutils-git-2_36_1/libiberty/../include -W -

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] [11/12 Regression] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-06-13 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #3 from J.M. Eubank --- Yes, this definitely seems specific to the native x86_64-w64-mingw32 build.

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-05-09 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 --- Comment #1 from J.M. Eubank --- Created attachment 50781 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50781&action=edit sha1-O2-save-temps joeub@DESKTOP-1LUONFR MINGW64 /crossdev/gccmaster/build-cross4/binutils/libiberty $ ls sha1-O

[Bug tree-optimization/100494] New: Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32)

2021-05-09 Thread john at thesnappy dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494 Bug ID: 100494 Summary: Unterminated recursion in gimple-range.cc (x86_64-w64-mingw32) Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal