[Bug libgcj/52579] [4.8/4.9/5 regression] i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63621] New: [ICE] symtab_node::verify failed

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jojelino at gmail dot com Host: i686-pc-cygwin Target: i686-pc-cygwin Build: i686-pc-cygwin Created attachment 33783 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33783&action=edit prep

[Bug target/57680] [META-BUG][target]deregister_frame_fn is set to invalid address in cygming-crtbegin.c:__gcc_deregister_frame due to unknown reason.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57680 --- Comment #4 from gee --- I think gcc backend for x86 that doesn't support weak attribute needed to supress weak attribute on variables as long as gas/16011 is not fixed.

[Bug target/57680] [META-BUG][target]deregister_frame_fn is set to invalid address in cygming-crtbegin.c:__gcc_deregister_frame due to unknown reason.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57680 --- Comment #2 from gee --- (gdb) x/i 0x46e010 0x46e010 <__deregister_frame_info_bases+160>:fs which is cause of SIGILL

[Bug target/57680] [META-BUG][target]deregister_frame_fn is set to invalid address in cygming-crtbegin.c:__gcc_deregister_frame due to unknown reason.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57680 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|deregister_frame_fn is set |[META-BUG][target]deregiste |to i

[Bug target/57680] New: xgcc terminates with SIGILL

Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jojelino at gmail dot com Host: i686-pc-cygwin Target: i686-pc-cygwin Build: i686-pc-cygwin $ gdb --args ./xgcc -B./ -B/usr/i686-pc-cygwin/bin/ -isystem /usr/i686-pc-cygwin/include -isystem /usr/i686-pc

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recursion in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #6 from gee --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3) > Intuitively, I'd say: > > @@ -10041,7 +10041,7 @@ > >if (TREE_CODE (arg1) == COND_EXPR > || TREE_CODE (arg1) == VEC_COND_EXPR > - || COMPARISON_CLASS_

[Bug middle-end/57286] [4.9 regression] infinite recursion in fold-const.c:10037

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57286 --- Comment #5 from gee --- Created attachment 30129 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30129&action=edit proposed patch

[Bug c/57286] New: [4.9 regression] infinite recurison in fold-const.c:10037

Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: jojelino at gmail dot com Created attachment 30121 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30121&action=edit preprocessed source (gdb) r Starting program: /usr/libexec/gcc/

[Bug target/56975] [regression] dllimport broken on i686-pc-cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975 --- Comment #8 from gee 2013-04-19 14:26:15 UTC --- Created attachment 29904 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29904 Patch for supporting cygwin32's SYSV_ABI proper - Fixed a hunk fail (In reply to comment #7) > At wha

[Bug target/56975] [regression] dllimport broken on i686-pc-cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975 --- Comment #4 from gee 2013-04-18 16:25:13 UTC --- Caused by r197373. Reverting the commit fixed the problem. commit 5496fac88af2009a2c4d5cfec0e722d5f962d80e Author: ktietz Date: Tue Apr 2 18:34:32 2013 + PR target/527

[Bug target/56975] [regression] dllimport broken on i686-pc-cygwin

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975 gee changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jojelino at gmail dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/56952] [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/56952] [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |blocker

[Bug rtl-optimization/56952] [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952 --- Comment #2 from gee 2013-04-14 09:11:40 UTC --- $ gdb --args /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/cc1.exe -fpreprocessed gthr-win32.i -quiet -dumpbase gthr-win32.c -mtune=generic -march=pentiumpro -auxbase-strip gthr-win32.o -g -g -g -O2 -O2 -Wex

[Bug rtl-optimization/56952] [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952 --- Comment #1 from gee 2013-04-14 09:06:38 UTC --- Created attachment 29870 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29870 preprocessed source

[Bug rtl-optimization/56952] New: [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952 Bug #: 56952 Summary: [4.9 regression] ICE in recog.c:2150 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/56796] New: ‘TARGET_CYGWIN64’ was not declared in this scope

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56796 Bug #: 56796 Summary: ‘TARGET_CYGWIN64’ was not declared in this scope Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/55317] New: [i386-regression] just don't strip stdcall suffix in gcc

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55317 Bug #: 55317 Summary: [i386-regression] just don't strip stdcall suffix in gcc Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 --- Comment #6 from gee 2012-09-19 13:20:59 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Still broken? I suspect it would be duplicate of 54314.

[Bug libgcj/51498] make dejagnu work in libjava testsuite with cross-build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #6 from gee 2012-08-21 20:10:01 UTC --- Created attachment 28065 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=28065 proposed patch just added one line. _ZTC* is then exported.

[Bug c++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #5 from gee 2012-08-21 13:38:57 UTC --- I think symbol _ZTCSt* need to be included in libstdc++/config/abi/pre/gnu.ver so that shared-library can export these symbols unless user did append --disable-symvers. nothing need to be done

[Bug c++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-08-20 16:15:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) > --export-all-symbols didn't work at all. > pick-reverting just one commit failed with conflict. > > > [966](sec 86)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 2) (nx 0) 0x > Con

[Bug c++/54314] [4.8 Regression] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #3 from gee 2012-08-20 15:21:53 UTC --- --export-all-symbols didn't work at all. pick-reverting just one commit failed with conflict. [966](sec 86)(fl 0x00)(ty 0)(scl 2) (nx 0) 0x Contents of section .rdata$_ZNSt14numeri

[Bug regression/54314] undefined references to 'construction vtable for std::ostream-in-std::basic_ostringstream, std::allocator >'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54314 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-08-18 14:53:53 UTC --- bug 53518 also has this problem. reference type in method argument causes symbol reference of construction vtable for ***. so, construction vtable for * symbol must not be marked as weak in PE ta

[Bug middle-end/53518] [4.8 regression] testsuite_abi_check.cc doesn't compile

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53518 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-08-14 18:49:53 UTC --- cppcheck fails to compile because of this bug. cli/cmdlineparser.o: In function `~basic_istream': /usr/include/c++/4.8.0/istream:106: undefined reference to `construction vtable for std::basic_i

[Bug tree-optimization/54094] New: [4.8 regression] ICE in graphite-dependences.c:320 : isl_constraint.c:497: position out of bounds

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094 Bug #: 54094 Summary: [4.8 regression] ICE in graphite-dependences.c:320 : isl_constraint.c:497: position out of bounds Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0

[Bug libffi/53674] [libffi] 260 excess testsuite failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53674 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-06-14 17:57:01 UTC --- Please note that http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=27620 patch is used to help dejagnu invoke proper mingw-targeted compiler.

[Bug libffi/53674] New: [libffi] 260 excess testsuite failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53674 Bug #: 53674 Summary: [libffi] 260 excess testsuite failure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libgcj/52579] [4.8 regression] i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-04-19 08:23:39 UTC --- i came into conclusion that we need to separate ffi_closure_raw_THISCALL from ffi_closure_raw_SYSV(not using such as jmp .stubraw), because ffi_closure_raw_THISCALL is not transparent by CFI so t

[Bug libgcj/52579] New: [4.8 regression] i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52579 Bug #: 52579 Summary: [4.8 regression] i386_w32_fallback_frame_state should care ffi raw-closure stub function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libgcj/52344] New: [4.x regression] _Jv_platform_nanotime of win32.cc is wrong

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52344 Bug #: 52344 Summary: [4.x regression] _Jv_platform_nanotime of win32.cc is wrong Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/52051] [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #14 from gee 2012-02-22 18:13:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #13) > Yes, this looks better IMHO. Btw any differences about libjava testsuite run > about this altered libffi patch? WARNING: Couldn't find the global config file. Test

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #12 from gee 2012-02-17 08:38:01 UTC --- Created attachment 26692 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26692 proposed patch without trampoline diff (In reply to comment #10) > I see here three issues about this patch. >

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #11 from gee 2012-02-16 23:19:45 UTC --- (In reply to comment #8) > Created attachment 26685 [details] > proposed patch > > with this patch, ExtraClassLoader testcase passed with three `true' > testing for whole libjava testsuite. Ru

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26653|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #8 from gee 2012-02-16 20:12:21 UTC --- Created attachment 26685 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26685 proposed patch with this patch, ExtraClassLoader testcase passed with three `true' testing for whole libjava te

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[libffi] r184021 needs to |[libffi] r183675,r184021 |be fixe

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #5 from gee 2012-02-13 18:35:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26653 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26653 proposed patch sorry for pr51500 attachment 26584, it was very bad idea. thiscall trampoline uses call insn so

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libffi/52221] New: [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 Bug #: 52221 Summary: [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug boehm-gc/52217] New: [boehm-gc] revision 184100 causes segmentation fault in mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52217 Bug #: 52217 Summary: [boehm-gc] revision 184100 causes segmentation fault in mingw32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26574|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #23 from gee 2012-02-05 02:43:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) > at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 > 88uw_init_context (&this_context); > (gdb) bt > #0 _Unwind_RaiseE

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #22 from gee 2012-02-05 02:11:12 UTC --- Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 88uw_init_context (&this_context); (gdb) bt #0 _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././l

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #21 from gee 2012-02-05 01:22:36 UTC --- Created attachment 26574 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26574 proposed patch for workaround TestEarlyGC failure it deals raw closure stub with thiscall calling convention.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #20 from gee 2012-02-04 11:32:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26573 proposed patch for workaround Throw_2 failure it was call %ebx for sig_pat. and Throw_2 test passed with this

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||51901 --- Comment #18 from gee 2012-02-01 05:20:53

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #11 from gee 2012-01-30 15:10:48 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26513 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26513 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 @@ -505,6 +508,23 @@ ffi_prep_incoming_args_SYSV(char *stack, void

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26499|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-30 07:15:28 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 invalid attachment. please ignore it.

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #3 from gee 2012-01-30 07:14:42 UTC --- Created attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 FAIL: TestClosureGC output FAIL: libjava.jar/TestClosureGC.jar executio

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-01-30 04:17:43 UTC --- in dump.zip, filename with prefix 0 : without -O flag with prefix 1 : with -O flag.

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] New: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 Bug #: 52051 Summary: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26338|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libgcj/51901] [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-19 12:36:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why the 4.7 regression tag? Does it work in 4.6? I think the amount of > libgcj > changes since 4.6 has been very small... sorry for 4.7 regression tag. it worked be

[Bug libgcj/51901] New: [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 Bug #: 51901 Summary: [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #7 from gee 2012-01-18 13:35:15 UTC --- after applying pr50057 patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365 === libjava Summary === # of expected passes2324 # of unexpected failures51 #

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-18 13:28:53 UTC --- Created attachment 26365 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365 proposed patch it fixes invalid padding that caused the bug. #include #define DEBUG 1 #include #include #in

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] |natObject.cc:58

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 --- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-18 06:14:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm, this might be a duplicate for already fixed PR/50053. Could you please > check, if you still have this issue here with current trunk version. > > Thanks Startin

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #6 from gee 2012-01-16 13:17:09 UTC --- Created attachment 26338 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26338 proposed patch for handling thiscall adopted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552533 without a

[Bug libgcj/51498] make dejagnu work in libjava testsuite with cross-build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|temporary hack to make |make dejagnu work in |dejagnu wor

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-18 22:02:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hmm, this might be another instance for already solved PR/50053. Could you > recheck, if error is still present for current 4.7 trunk version. > > Thanks Target is i

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-15 13:00:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > so it should figure that out automatically. Aren't you e.g. building in > source > directory (./configure ...)? Otherwise it would be good if you could debug > why

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-13 10:48:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > None of the testsuite Makefiles for other libraries do anything similar > (libgomp, libstdc++-v3, ..., so why is libjava so special that it needs it?). > make check def

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #3 from gee 2011-12-12 14:48:52 UTC --- it seems that libffi handles calling convention of method which is cdecl or stdcall. but not for thiscall for mingw32 ia-32.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-12 14:46:26 UTC --- please fix java::lang::Class::initializeClass for mingw32 ia-32 by adding __thiscall before being involved this bug. surely PR50053 is fixed but i leaved a kludge toward this bug.

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-12 10:41:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What's the issue you are fixing? i experienced the dejagnu error that gcj is not found in path. this is because of gnu make doesn't export its variable to environment i

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-12-10 18:59:19 UTC --- stacktrace Starting program: /tmp/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/libjava/testsuite/.libs/TestClosureGC [New Thread 3600.0xf5c] [New Thread 3600.0x1338] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault

[Bug libgcj/51500] New: [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 Bug #: 51500 Summary: [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug libgcj/51498] New: [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 Bug #: 51498 Summary: [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #12 from gee 2011-12-09 22:24:56 UTC --- Created attachment 26037 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26037 proposed patch (In reply to comment #11) > Suggested patch for this issue (together with the pending patch for

[Bug libgcj/51470] [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcj/51470] New: [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470 Bug #: 51470 Summary: [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #10 from gee 2011-12-08 19:15:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) whereas with -findirect-dispatch, initializer code isn't omitted. ;; Function () (_ZN3gnu3gcj7convert10Input_UTF8C1Ev, funcdef_no=47, decl_uid=3185, cgraph_uid=94) ()

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] jc1 |natClass.cc

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #8 from gee 2011-12-08 18:49:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26028 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26028 generated rtl from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fno-shrink-wrap -quiet -fhash-synchronizat

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-08 18:47:29 UTC --- Created attachment 26027 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26027 generated tree from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subrou

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-12-08 18:45:46 UTC --- Created attachment 26026 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26026 generated zip file

[Bug rtl-optimization/51366] [cygwin] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-05 05:02:23 UTC --- Created attachment 25988 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25988 preprocessed source g++ -L/tmp/winsup/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup -L/tmp/winsup/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cygwin -L/tmp/w

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/50426] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -O1 ICE in estimate_function_body_sizes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50426 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-11-10 17:04:40 UTC --- Created attachment 25787 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25787 preprocessed source $ g++ Engine.ii -c -O2 src/Engine.cpp: In member function 'void boost::python::class_::def_

[Bug tree-optimization/50995] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in ipa-inline.c:1413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50995 Bug #: 50995 Summary: [4.5 regression] ICE in ipa-inline.c:1413 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #12 from gee 2011-11-04 16:16:57 UTC --- Created attachment 25719 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25719 generated rtl with pr50725

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25493|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #10 from gee 2011-11-04 13:40:37 UTC --- g++ -fverbose-asm -c -O1 -finline-small-functions -fdisable-ipa-inline -ftree-vectorize -finline-functions -mstackrealign -march=core2 ./pseudo-reloc.ii -save-temps ;cat pseudo-reloc.s|grep "(%

[Bug tree-optimization/50784] [4.7 regression] -fenable-ipa-pure-const causes segmentation fault in cgraph.c:327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] internal |[4.7 regression] |compiler error:

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-10-23 13:42:43 UTC --- maybe this is related to x86_this_parameter in gcc/config/i386/i386.c it might tell why caller push parameter to stack, whereas function prologue treats first parameter is in %ecx when MS_ABI is

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-10-22 19:33:19 UTC --- ;; ;; Full RTL generated for this function: ;; (note 1 0 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (insn 2 4 3 2 (set (reg/f:SI 61 [ this ]) (reg:SI 2 cx [ this ]

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-10-22 17:37:37 UTC --- Created attachment 25576 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25576 testcase

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-10-22 17:35:01 UTC --- and newer one. (gdb) r Starting program: /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe gnu.zip -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine -fcheck-references -fuse-boehm-gc -fkeep-inline-functions

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] |link.cc:1904

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-10-22 15:15:07 UTC --- $ gdb --args ./gcj-dbtool.exe rGNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.50.20110903-cvs Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later T

[Bug libgcj/50831] New: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 Bug #: 50831 Summary: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

  1   2   3   >