[Bug c++/42609] New: undesired operation when working with mno-cygwin

cygwin flag for gcc with host i686-pc-cygwin, stdcxx wrappers for cygwin must be disabled because of libcygwin.a is not linked with it. but, when building gcc for target i686-pc-cygwin , USE_CYGWIN_LIBSTDCXX_WRAPPERS and -mno-use-libstdc-wrappers seems to be enabled. then, CXX_WRAP_SPEC_LIST will be enabled although it must be disabled when added flag -mno-cygwin. causing undefined symbol problem which i had. but when linking with i686-pc-mingw32-g++, it has no undefined symbol problem. because there is no --wrap argument. please consider to fix this problem -- Summary: undesired operation when working with mno-cygwin Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-mingw32 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42609

[Bug libgcj/42658] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-08 17:50 --- here is vtable dump for klass as you can see , klass->engine of dynamic version is NULL whereas static version got proper instance though so klass->engine->verify(klass); invokes SEGV... but why does it

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 06:11 --- maybe this could be linker problem. jcr section doesn't seem preserved in shared library. 00ffd668 d ___JCR_LIST__ 010021c4 d ___JCR_END__ 004097b4 d ___JCR_LIST__ 004097c0 d ___JCR_END__ -- http://gcc.gn

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #4 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 07:40 --- Created an attachment (id=19517) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19517&action=view) diff file i used here is configuration ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-win32-registry --enable-thread

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #5 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 07:44 --- (From update of attachment 19517) here is configuration ./configure --prefix=/usr --disable-win32-registry --enable-threads=posix --enable-languages=c,c++,java --with-win32-nlsapi=unicode --enable-tls --disable-bootstrap

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #7 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 08:40 --- Created an attachment (id=19520) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19520&action=view) gzipped text oh my. it counts more than 65535.. [167929] and gzipped file exceed limit 1000k so i can'

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #9 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:24 --- (From update of attachment 19520) oh my i ran objdump -t instead of objdump -p i'm sorry for this. -- jojelino at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #10 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:26 --- Created an attachment (id=19521) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19521&action=view) undefined symbol list this is undefined symbol list when i link without --export-all-symbols when linking

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #12 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 09:56 --- (In reply to comment #11) > Ah. It's probably caused by --enable-java-awt. AWT isn't yet supported on > cygwin yet; looks like it will need some adjustment to the way .o files are > divided between

[Bug libgcj/42658] [4.5 regression] ICE in _Jv_Linker::verify_class ../.././libjava/link.cc:1904

--- Comment #13 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-09 10:08 --- Created an attachment (id=19522) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19522&action=view) hdrs (with --export-all-symbols) which i should have attached it counts 57439 whoa, what happens if total

[Bug java/42811] New: [4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1

Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: java AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42811

[Bug java/42811] [4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1

--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-20 05:02 --- linking executables with -Wl,--whole-archive libgcj-noncore.la libgcj.la -Wl,--no-whole-archive solves this problem. excepts that it creates fatty import symbol table approx. (28 megabyte). is there any workaround

[Bug java/42811] [4.5 regression] java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError in ecj1

--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-21 04:55 --- Created an attachment (id=19671) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19671&action=view) patch now it summons gcj-noncore dll and resolves classes which should have been resolved. i know it's

[Bug c++/42859] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

on] ICE in verify_flow_info Product: gcc Version: 4.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com GCC build tripl

[Bug c++/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-25 00:11 --- Created an attachment (id=19698) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19698&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug c++/42859] [4.5 regression] ICE in verify_flow_info

--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-25 00:23 --- Created an attachment (id=19699) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19699&action=view) testcase other testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42859

[Bug c++/42870] New: [4.5 regression] __attribute__ ((dllexport)) produces broken linkage

assigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jojelino at gmail dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC host triplet: i686-pc-cygwin GCC target triplet: i686-pc-cygwin http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42870

[Bug c++/42870] [4.5 regression] __attribute__ ((dllexport)) produces broken linkage

--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-26 10:41 --- Created an attachment (id=19709) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19709&action=view) given __attribute__ ((dllexport)) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42870

[Bug c++/42870] [4.5 regression] __attribute__ ((dllexport)) produces broken linkage

--- Comment #3 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-01-26 22:02 --- Created an attachment (id=19719) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19719&action=view) given __attribute__ ((visibility ("default"))) and test result (given __attribute__ ((dllexport))

[Bug c++/43196] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr

rflow -falign-loops -o TimgFilterAvisynth.s GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.5.0 20100227 (experimental) (i686-pc-mingw32) compiled by GNU C version 4.5.0 20100221 (experimental), GMP version 5.0.0, MPFR version 2.4.2, MPC version 0.8.1 GGC heuristics: --param ggc-min-expand=30 --param ggc-min-heapsize=4096 GNU

[Bug c++/43196] [4.5 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr

--- Comment #1 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 08:12 --- Created an attachment (id=19973) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=19973&action=view) preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43196

[Bug c++/43196] [4.5 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr

--- Comment #2 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-02-27 08:44 --- when given without -mstackrealign, it works fine. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43196

[Bug target/43196] [4.5 regression] ICE in dwarf2out_frame_debug_expr

--- Comment #5 from jojelino at gmail dot com 2010-03-25 02:07 --- well, this bug seems not active for now. works in current gcc -- jojelino at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug middle-end/50451] New: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at tree-vect-loop.c:3557

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50451 Bug #: 50451 Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at tree-vect-loop.c:3557 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug driver/50475] New: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475 Bug #: 50475 Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50482] New: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at recog.c:2137

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50482 Bug #: 50482 Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at recog.c:2137 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50658] New: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in tree-flow-inline.h:562

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50658 Bug #: 50658 Summary: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in tree-flow-inline.h:562 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug driver/50475] [4.7 regression] internal compiler error at passes.c:1730

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50475 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/50723] New: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50723 Bug #: 50723 Summary: [4.7 regression] internal compiler error: verify_ssa failed Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/50725] New: [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 Bug #: 50725 Summary: [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-10-14 16:01:26 UTC --- following passes were enabled. i think if the following result of -fdump-passes aren't same for the result of -m32, the wrong generated one wouldn't come out. $ gcc -O3 -mstackrealign -march=cor

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #3 from gee 2011-10-14 16:26:15 UTC --- generated prologue with pseudo-reloc.ii (wrong one) ;; ;; Full RTL generated for this function: ;; (note 8 0 11 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 11 8 459 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (insn 459 11 9

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-10-14 16:27:31 UTC --- Created attachment 25501 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25501 reduced source code but generates correct prologue.

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-10-14 16:29:56 UTC --- by comparing the result of -fdump-passes between pseudo-reloc.ii and r.c, --- r.c.pass +++ pseudo-reloc.pass @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ tree-mudflap1 : OFF tre

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-10-14 16:38:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) Sorry. this comment is obsolete.

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25501|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #8 from gee 2011-10-14 17:00:11 UTC --- Created attachment 25503 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25503 generated rtl with pseudo-reloc.ii

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #9 from gee 2011-10-17 15:42:21 UTC --- here is more specific option for reproduce this bug. $ g++ -fverbose-asm -c -O1 -finline-small-functions -ftree-vectorize -finline-functions -mstackrealign -march=core2 ./pseudo-reloc.ii -save-

[Bug tree-optimization/50784] New: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault in cgraph.c:327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784 Bug #: 50784 Summary: [4.6 regression] internal compiler error: segmentation fault in cgraph.c:327 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UN

[Bug libgcj/50831] New: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 Bug #: 50831 Summary: [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in link.cc:1904

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-10-22 15:15:07 UTC --- $ gdb --args ./gcj-dbtool.exe rGNU gdb (GDB) 7.3.50.20110903-cvs Copyright (C) 2011 Free Software Foundation, Inc. License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later T

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] |link.cc:1904

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-10-22 17:35:01 UTC --- and newer one. (gdb) r Starting program: /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe gnu.zip -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subroutine -fcheck-references -fuse-boehm-gc -fkeep-inline-functions

[Bug java/50045] [4.7 regression] ICE in gcc/java/lang.c:427 with -ftree-dump-all

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50045 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-10-22 17:37:37 UTC --- Created attachment 25576 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25576 testcase

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-10-22 19:33:19 UTC --- ;; ;; Full RTL generated for this function: ;; (note 1 0 4 NOTE_INSN_DELETED) (note 4 1 2 2 [bb 2] NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK) (insn 2 4 3 2 (set (reg/f:SI 61 [ this ]) (reg:SI 2 cx [ this ]

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-10-23 13:42:43 UTC --- maybe this is related to x86_this_parameter in gcc/config/i386/i386.c it might tell why caller push parameter to stack, whereas function prologue treats first parameter is in %ecx when MS_ABI is

[Bug tree-optimization/50784] [4.7 regression] -fenable-ipa-pure-const causes segmentation fault in cgraph.c:327

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50784 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] internal |[4.7 regression] |compiler error:

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #10 from gee 2011-11-04 13:40:37 UTC --- g++ -fverbose-asm -c -O1 -finline-small-functions -fdisable-ipa-inline -ftree-vectorize -finline-functions -mstackrealign -march=core2 ./pseudo-reloc.ii -save-temps ;cat pseudo-reloc.s|grep "(%

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25493|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 --- Comment #12 from gee 2011-11-04 16:16:57 UTC --- Created attachment 25719 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25719 generated rtl with pr50725

[Bug tree-optimization/50995] New: [4.5 regression] ICE in ipa-inline.c:1413

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50995 Bug #: 50995 Summary: [4.5 regression] ICE in ipa-inline.c:1413 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/50426] [4.7 Regression] gfortran -O1 ICE in estimate_function_body_sizes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50426 --- Comment #4 from gee 2011-11-10 17:04:40 UTC --- Created attachment 25787 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25787 preprocessed source $ g++ Engine.ii -c -O2 src/Engine.cpp: In member function 'void boost::python::class_::def_

[Bug target/50725] [4.7 regression] -O3 -mstackrealign -march=core2 generates invalid prologue code in callee procedure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50725 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/51366] [cygwin] ICE in maybe_record_trace_start, at dwarf2cfi.c:2244

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-05 05:02:23 UTC --- Created attachment 25988 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25988 preprocessed source g++ -L/tmp/winsup/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup -L/tmp/winsup/i686-pc-cygwin/winsup/cygwin -L/tmp/w

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #6 from gee 2011-12-08 18:45:46 UTC --- Created attachment 26026 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26026 generated zip file

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-08 18:47:29 UTC --- Created attachment 26027 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26027 generated tree from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fhash-synchronization -fuse-divide-subrou

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natClass.cc:651

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #8 from gee 2011-12-08 18:49:10 UTC --- Created attachment 26028 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26028 generated rtl from gnu.zip /tmp/gcc/host-i686-pc-cygwin/gcc/jc1.exe -fno-shrink-wrap -quiet -fhash-synchronizat

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] jc1 |natClass.cc

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #10 from gee 2011-12-08 19:15:47 UTC --- (In reply to comment #9) whereas with -findirect-dispatch, initializer code isn't omitted. ;; Function () (_ZN3gnu3gcj7convert10Input_UTF8C1Ev, funcdef_no=47, decl_uid=3185, cgraph_uid=94) ()

[Bug libgcj/51470] New: [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470 Bug #: 51470 Summary: [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/51470] [4.7 regression] make sure libgcj_bc=yes iff enable_shared=yes

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51470 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug libgcj/50053] [4.7 regression] jc1 doesn't emit static initializer or initializer code for super class without -findirect-dispatch.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50053 --- Comment #12 from gee 2011-12-09 22:24:56 UTC --- Created attachment 26037 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26037 proposed patch (In reply to comment #11) > Suggested patch for this issue (together with the pending patch for

[Bug libgcj/51498] New: [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 Bug #: 51498 Summary: [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libgcj/51500] New: [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 Bug #: 51500 Summary: [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #1 from gee 2011-12-10 18:59:19 UTC --- stacktrace Starting program: /tmp/gcc/i686-pc-mingw32/libjava/testsuite/.libs/TestClosureGC [New Thread 3600.0xf5c] [New Thread 3600.0x1338] Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-12 10:41:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > What's the issue you are fixing? i experienced the dejagnu error that gcj is not found in path. this is because of gnu make doesn't export its variable to environment i

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #2 from gee 2011-12-12 14:46:26 UTC --- please fix java::lang::Class::initializeClass for mingw32 ia-32 by adding __thiscall before being involved this bug. surely PR50053 is fixed but i leaved a kludge toward this bug.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #3 from gee 2011-12-12 14:48:52 UTC --- it seems that libffi handles calling convention of method which is cdecl or stdcall. but not for thiscall for mingw32 ia-32.

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-13 10:48:50 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > None of the testsuite Makefiles for other libraries do anything similar > (libgomp, libstdc++-v3, ..., so why is libjava so special that it needs it?). > make check def

[Bug libgcj/51498] [4.7 regression] temporary hack to make dejagnu work in libjava

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 --- Comment #7 from gee 2011-12-15 13:00:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) > so it should figure that out automatically. Aren't you e.g. building in > source > directory (./configure ...)? Otherwise it would be good if you could debug > why

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #5 from gee 2011-12-18 22:02:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > Hmm, this might be another instance for already solved PR/50053. Could you > recheck, if error is still present for current 4.7 trunk version. > > Thanks Target is i

[Bug libgcj/51498] make dejagnu work in libjava testsuite with cross-build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51498 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|temporary hack to make |make dejagnu work in |dejagnu wor

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #6 from gee 2012-01-16 13:17:09 UTC --- Created attachment 26338 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26338 proposed patch for handling thiscall adopted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552533 without a

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in natObject.cc:58

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 --- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-18 06:14:17 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Hmm, this might be a duplicate for already fixed PR/50053. Could you please > check, if you still have this issue here with current trunk version. > > Thanks Startin

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.7 regression] SIGSEGV in |[4.7 regression] |natObject.cc:58

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug libgcj/50831] [4.7 regression] __gcc_register_frame must throw error when failed to load dll

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50831 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal

[Bug libgcj/50057] [4.7 regression] misalignment of java_exception_header resulted in throwable to be null

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50057 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-18 13:28:53 UTC --- Created attachment 26365 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365 proposed patch it fixes invalid padding that caused the bug. #include #define DEBUG 1 #include #include #in

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #7 from gee 2012-01-18 13:35:15 UTC --- after applying pr50057 patch http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26365 === libjava Summary === # of expected passes2324 # of unexpected failures51 #

[Bug libgcj/51901] New: [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 Bug #: 51901 Summary: [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0

[Bug libgcj/51901] [4.7 regression] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #2 from gee 2012-01-19 12:36:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Why the 4.7 regression tag? Does it work in 4.6? I think the amount of > libgcj > changes since 4.6 has been very small... sorry for 4.7 regression tag. it worked be

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26338|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] New: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 Bug #: 52051 Summary: [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/52051] [4.7 regression] invalid stack-cleanup occured with -O flag

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52051 --- Comment #1 from gee 2012-01-30 04:17:43 UTC --- in dump.zip, filename with prefix 0 : without -O flag with prefix 1 : with -O flag.

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #3 from gee 2012-01-30 07:14:42 UTC --- Created attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 FAIL: TestClosureGC output FAIL: libjava.jar/TestClosureGC.jar executio

[Bug libgcj/51901] java.security.Security.getProperty throws ExceptionInInitializerError

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51901 --- Comment #4 from gee 2012-01-30 07:15:28 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26512 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26512 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 invalid attachment. please ignore it.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26499|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #11 from gee 2012-01-30 15:10:48 UTC --- Comment on attachment 26513 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26513 proposed patch for handling thiscall r3 @@ -505,6 +508,23 @@ ffi_prep_incoming_args_SYSV(char *stack, void

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||51901 --- Comment #18 from gee 2012-02-01 05:20:53

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #20 from gee 2012-02-04 11:32:07 UTC --- Created attachment 26573 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26573 proposed patch for workaround Throw_2 failure it was call %ebx for sig_pat. and Throw_2 test passed with this

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #21 from gee 2012-02-05 01:22:36 UTC --- Created attachment 26574 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26574 proposed patch for workaround TestEarlyGC failure it deals raw closure stub with thiscall calling convention.

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #22 from gee 2012-02-05 02:11:12 UTC --- Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 88uw_init_context (&this_context); (gdb) bt #0 _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) at ../.././l

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 --- Comment #23 from gee 2012-02-05 02:43:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #22) > Breakpoint 9, _Unwind_RaiseException (exc=0xa92820) > at ../.././libgcc/unwind.inc:88 > 88uw_init_context (&this_context); > (gdb) bt > #0 _Unwind_RaiseE

[Bug libgcj/51500] [4.7 regression] 106 unexpected libjava testsuite failures with mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51500 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #26574|0 |1 is obsolete||

[Bug boehm-gc/52217] New: [boehm-gc] revision 184100 causes segmentation fault in mingw32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52217 Bug #: 52217 Summary: [boehm-gc] revision 184100 causes segmentation fault in mingw32 Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libffi/52221] New: [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 Bug #: 52221 Summary: [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed. Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|WAITING Resolution|FIXED

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 --- Comment #5 from gee 2012-02-13 18:35:18 UTC --- Created attachment 26653 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26653 proposed patch sorry for pr51500 attachment 26584, it was very bad idea. thiscall trampoline uses call insn so

[Bug libffi/52221] [libffi] r183675,r184021 needs to be fixed.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52221 gee changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[libffi] r184021 needs to |[libffi] r183675,r184021 |be fixe

  1   2   3   >