[Bug fortran/40070] Some math expressions containing exponents fail on a Windows 64 build

2009-05-08 Thread jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com
--- Comment #10 from jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com 2009-05-08 15:51 --- When I run the fortran code: print *, precision(1.e0), digits(1.e0) I get: 6,24 *.original file yields: myfunc (real(kind=4) & a, real(kind=4) & b, real(kind=4) & c, real(kind=4) &

[Bug fortran/40070] Some math expressions containing exponents fail on a Windows 64 build

2009-05-08 Thread jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com
--- Comment #7 from jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com 2009-05-08 15:40 --- Checked the size of a float with sizeof(float) and got 4 bytes. How can I check the size of REAL in fortran? When I try the USE ISO_C_BINDING I get the same result. -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug fortran/40070] Some math expressions containing exponents fail on a Windows 64 build

2009-05-08 Thread jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com
--- Comment #4 from jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com 2009-05-08 15:27 --- When I run Dominique's main function written in fortran, I get: res1res2 res1-res2 6.09E-24 310.40363 -310.40363 8.92E-23 23223.025 -23223.025 -4.01E-06 142007.59 -1420

[Bug fortran/40070] Some math expressions containing exponents fail on a Windows 64 build

2009-05-08 Thread jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com
--- Comment #2 from jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com 2009-05-08 15:03 --- I used C code to call the function because the fortran code is being compiled into a C based application. When I run the sample main function, the values are obviously different. Function 1: result

[Bug fortran/40070] New: Some math expressions containing exponents fail on a Windows 64 build

2009-05-08 Thread jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com
Windows 64 build Product: gcc Version: 4.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Component: fortran AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: jonathan dot d dot wetherbee at saic dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40070