--- Comment #6 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2008-12-18 19:39 ---
> This still fails here:
>
> gfortran -v -O2 -g -ffree-form -fgraphite -fgraphite-identity -cpp -D__FFTSG
> PR38492.f90
>
I looked into this failure. It fails because the number of iterations can
--- Comment #8 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-13 01:56 ---
(In reply to comment #7)
> >+static tree get_generic_type_node_from_size(int size)
>
> This function needs lots of improvement because the size of the modes is based
> on UNIT_BIT_SIZE (I think th
--- Comment #6 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-12-03 15:41 ---
> Indeed the extra load disappeared when with the patch. The store did not get
> deleted as expected. I looked at the differences between the good and bad
> case.
After doing some more investigation an a
--- Comment #5 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-13 17:07 ---
(In reply to comment #4)
> Related to PR 33790 (and most likely fixed by it). There is another issue
> with
> that bug relating to not deleting the extra store.
>
Indeed the extra load disappeared w
--- Comment #3 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:17 ---
Created an attachment (id=14518)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14518&action=view)
Assembly code for good code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043
--- Comment #2 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14517)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14517&action=view)
Assembly code for bad code.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043
--- Comment #1 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-11-09 16:16 ---
Created an attachment (id=14516)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14516&action=view)
Source code to expose the missed optimization
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043
gnu dot org
ReportedBy: jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34043
--- Comment #15 from jsjodin at gcc dot gnu dot org 2007-10-11 14:17
---
(In reply to comment #14)
> BTW, without this patch
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-07/msg02122.html
> there is no ICE and the loop gets vectorized.
>
> Ira
>
It may be that the tes
