http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
--- Comment #6 from Kai Koehne ---
The issue is still there with 4.8.1 . It understand that the discussion on Kai
Tietz' original patch has stalled ... Any suggestion on how we can move this
forward?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57068
--- Comment #2 from Kai Koehne 2013-05-08
06:39:48 UTC ---
Still reproducable in revision 198685 . This is most likely a regression
introduced by http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-04/msg00024.html.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57068
Kai Koehne changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #29934|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57068
Bug #: 57068
Summary: gcc prints warning "ref-qualifiers only available with
-std=c++0x or -std=gnu++0x" for operator&
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56763
Bug #: 56763
Summary: "attribute ignored in declaration of " warning points
to wrong place
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54988
--- Comment #13 from Kai Koehne 2013-03-27
09:12:42 UTC ---
The OOM problem is still there with gcc 4.8.0 on MinGW: Any #pragma optimize
"X" will result in OOM for big files.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56038
--- Comment #5 from Kai Koehne 2013-03-26
12:26:04 UTC ---
Can confirm that the patch fixes the issue when applied locally.