https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #9 from Keith Lindsay ---
Harald,
Thanks for your tips on validation/sanitizing tools.
I am not sufficiently fluent in standard-ese to know what 'associated
do-loops(s)" means. It doesn't help that BLOCK and ASSOCIATE appear in othe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #7 from Keith Lindsay ---
The Linux system that I'm working on has multiple versions of gcc/gfortran
installed. I've compiled and run my example program with different versions and
have found the following:
Versions 4.9.0, 4.9.1, 4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #6 from Keith Lindsay ---
Harald,
The problem does go away if I add a PRIVATE(i) clause to the OMP directive.
However, my understanding of OpenMP in fortran is that all loop iteration
variables, even inner nested loops, in an OpenMP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #4 from Keith Lindsay ---
Thanks for taking a look. I've attached the output from the command
gfortran -v -fopenmp openmp_nested_loops.f90 -o openmp_nested_loops
on two different systems where I'm seeing the problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #3 from Keith Lindsay ---
Created attachment 38455
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38455&action=edit
output from gfortran -v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71014
--- Comment #2 from Keith Lindsay ---
Created attachment 38454
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38454&action=edit
output from gfortran -v
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: klindsay at ucar dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38446
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: klindsay at ucar dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36840
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36840&action=edit
program demonstrating problem
Hi