https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77921
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the breakage. I will try to reproduce it.
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #1)
> gcc version 7.0.0 20161007 was fine
Are you saying that this is issue is gone lat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Thu Oct 6 19:58:46 2016
New Revision: 240842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240842=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR77862
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-10-06 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77862
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
patch posted for review at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-10/msg00349.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue Sep 27 03:41:14 2016
New Revision: 240517
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240517=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix ipa-vrp convert value_range
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-27 Kugan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77719
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Sep 26 18:16:23 2016
New Revision: 240505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240505=gcc=rev
Log:
Fix PR77719
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-09-26 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77719
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #9)
> (In reply to kugan from comment #8)
> > Author: kugan
> > Date: Fri Sep 23 10:25:09 2016
> > New Revision: 240420
> >
&
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Sep 23 10:25:09 2016
New Revision: 240420
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240420=gcc=rev
Log:
Drop TREE_OVERFLOW
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-09-23 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #6)
> The test case 176.gcc in the spec2000 benchmarks still fails apparently with
> the same error even after 240352
>
> (this is with 240383)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed Sep 21 03:28:24 2016
New Revision: 240299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240299=gcc=rev
Log:
Incorrect arithmetic optimization involving bitfield arguments
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77499
--- Comment #13 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to avieira from comment #12)
> I heard Kugan was working on getting rid of superfluous zero_extends. Adding
> him to the watch list.
>
> @Kugan: Could your work help this ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77387
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
With :
diff --git a/gcc/tree-vrp.c b/gcc/tree-vrp.c
index e4d789b..2d1f4c8 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-vrp.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-vrp.c
@@ -3416,6 +3416,17 @@ extract_range_from_unary_expr_1 (value_range *vr
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
For testcase:
int foo (int i)
{
int x = i;
x = __builtin_abs (i);
x >>= 24;
if (x > 256)
return 0;
return x;
}
vrp1 dump is:
Val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sat Aug 20 01:18:09 2016
New Revision: 239637
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239637=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-08-20 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like it was a latent issue. In rewrite_expr_tree, when re-associate
operands, we should reset range_info for the LHS. We don’t do that now.
Following patch fixes the test case.
diff --git
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68217
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jul 29 00:35:23 2016
New Revision: 238846
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238846=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-29 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71994
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed Jul 27 23:02:44 2016
New Revision: 238803
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238803=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-28 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71994
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed Jul 27 22:45:46 2016
New Revision: 238802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238802=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-07-28 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71994
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch to fix this is posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-07/msg01680.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #19 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Jul 24 12:47:29 2016
New Revision: 238695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238695=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-07-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #17 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #15)
> (In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > > Is it still broken?
> >
&g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #10)
> Author: kugan
> Date: Tue May 24 00:14:13 2016
> New Revision: 236619
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236619=gcc=rev
> Lo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jun 10 21:57:01 2016
New Revision: 237318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237318=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-06-11 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #15 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > Is it still broken?
>
> I think so. Attachment seems to break svn 237286, dated to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Anton Mitrokhin from comment #8)
> Is this fixed?
Yes. Is this still not working for you?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 6 23:46:11 2016
New Revision: 237158
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237158=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-06-07 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon Jun 6 23:41:26 2016
New Revision: 237157
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237157=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-06-07 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00330.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looking into it. Looks like zero_one_operation is still broken.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Patch posted for review at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00316.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38640
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38640=edit
proposed patch
testing this patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71281
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry about the breakage. Looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #22 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:47:57 2016
New Revision: 236876
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236876=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #21 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Mon May 30 10:45:19 2016
New Revision: 236875
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236875=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-05-30 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71323
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71284
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kugan from comment #1)
> (In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> > An aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap with an in-tree mpfr fails with an ICE:
> > exp_2.i: I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71292
--- Comment #1 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #0)
> An aarch64-none-linux-gnu bootstrap with an in-tree mpfr fails with an ICE:
> exp_2.i: In function ‘fn1’:
> exp_2.i:4:6: internal compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #11)
> > Sorry, I missed that.
> >
> > on x86-64-linux-gnu, with the current trunk:
> > ./build/gcc/cc1 -O2 m_mallocfree.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> (In reply to kugan from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Roger Orr from comment #7)
> > > I've got a very similar problem,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Roger Orr from comment #13)
> The patch sadly does not appear to fix the (very similar looking) valgrind
> compilation failure I posted in pr71269.
>
> https://gcc.gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Roger Orr from comment #7)
> I've got a very similar problem, building valgrind with trunk revision
> 236644:
>
> m_mallocfree.c: In function 'sanity_check_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Posted patch at:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-05/msg02061.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71269
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> Started with r236634.
Hi Markus,
This looks like dup of PR71252. I have a patch for which I am testing now. Do
you have a preprocessed fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
What application is this testcase from? I have a patch which I want to try.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry for the breakage. I can reproduce this. I am looking into it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71230
--- Comment #15 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
> 0x1090f973 crash_signal
> /home/seurer/gcc/gcc-test/gcc/toplev.c:333
> 0x10b12ca0 sort_by_operand_rank
> /home/seurer/g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue May 24 10:50:01 2016
New Revision: 236634
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236634=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38549=edit
untested patch
testing this patch which fixes this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue May 24 00:14:13 2016
New Revision: 236619
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236619=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-05-24 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40921
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun May 22 08:13:13 2016
New Revision: 236564
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236564=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-22 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71179
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sat May 21 07:09:16 2016
New Revision: 236554
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236554=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-21 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71179
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38521
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38521=edit
untested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
We could also move _17 = c_7(D) * 3; at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3897 satisfy the
gcc_assert. We could do this based on the use count of _17? any suggestions?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My patch is not going to work.
At tree-ssa-reassoc.c:3897, we have:
stmt:
_15 = _4 + c_7(D);
oe->op def_stmt:
_17 = c_7(D) * 3;
:
a1_6 = s_5(D) * 2;
_1 = (long int) a1_6;
x1_8 = _1 + c_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38519
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38519=edit
Another way to fix
Thanks Martin Liška for looking into this. I am attaching another way to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
--- Comment #9 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed May 18 07:50:05 2016
New Revision: 236359
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236359=gcc=rev
Log:
Adding the testcase which was not addaed as part of r236356.
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
--- Comment #8 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Wed May 18 00:58:45 2016
New Revision: 236356
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236356=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-05-17 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68105
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zboson at zboson dot net
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70841
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #13)
> The change to the assignment of p_22 is made by forwprop1.
>
> It does create a situation where p_2 is live outside the loop and hides
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
However, diff of cfgexand is significantly different:
;; Full RTL generated for this function:
;;
32: NOTE_INSN_DELETED
- 38: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 2
+ 39: NOTE_INSN_BASIC_BLOCK 2
33
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Optimized gimple diff between 5.3 and trunk is :
-;; Function inttostr (inttostr, funcdef_no=0, decl_uid=5268, cgraph_uid=0,
symbol_order=0)
+;; Function inttostr (inttostr, funcdef_no=0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am looking into it. -mcpu=arm966e-s does not uses the
TARGET_NEW_GENERIC_COSTS. i.e, the rtx costs setup by the back-end might not be
optimal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #18 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Reverted r233362 as it caused PR69786 and PR69781. I will test for these and
post a revised patch for next stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69819
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589
--- Comment #12 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37688
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37688=edit
possible fix
This fixes the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589
--- Comment #11 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
In remove_unreachable_nodes, just before ipa-cp, this node becomes local
(address taken is false and local.local = true). After that, when
ipa_propagate_frequency is run, which updates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37685
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37685=edit
possible fix
Attached patch fixes the testcase.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #17 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 06:40:55 2016
New Revision: 233368
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233368=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #16 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Feb 12 00:24:22 2016
New Revision: 233362
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233362=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-02-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69708
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69442
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69377
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #6 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Sun Jan 17 02:44:26 2016
New Revision: 232481
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232481=gcc=rev
Log:
2016-01-17 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.org>
Ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #5 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for the reminder. I will commit the back-port today. I wanted leave few
days in the trunk before doing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194
--- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Tue Jan 12 00:40:54 2016
New Revision: 232251
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232251=gcc=rev
Log:
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-01-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah <kug...@linaro.
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37271
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37271=edit
testcase
Attached testcase ICE with:
t.C: In funct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69077
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincenzo.innocente at cern dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36908|0 |1
is obsolete
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed in trunk. We also need to back-port this to branches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61139
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66726
--- Comment #14 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Sorry I missed this. I posted patch which was OKed but in further testing I
found an issue. I am testing a modified patch and will post for review soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think the intention is to have multiplication by power-of-2?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63586
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
101 - 200 of 253 matches
Mail list logo
