http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294
--- Comment #1 from Kyle Kloepper
2011-03-26 11:15:19 UTC ---
This is also an issue in trunk:
[kkloepper@pan scratch]$ g++ -std=c++0x alisdair_bug.cc -o alisdair_bug
alisdair_bug.cc:9:36: internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at
cp/exc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294
Summary: internal compiler error: in build_noexcept_spec, at
cp/except.c:1217
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572
--- Comment #3 from Kyle Kloepper
2010-11-19 23:01:07 UTC ---
I would read the standard as in inclusive or. But even if you read it as one or
the other, I do not think that in all cases speed would be prefered over space.
Is there any way to im
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Kloepper
2010-11-19 22:47:47 UTC ---
Created attachment 22464
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22464
Program to print out the size used by forward_list node allocation
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46572
Summary: forward_list nodes are not packed
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
AssignedTo: unassig...@gc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46447
--- Comment #2 from Kyle Kloepper
2010-11-12 18:22:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 22382
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22382
Gzipped tarball of source code used to measure times of atomics.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46447
Summary: std::atomic_flag slower than std::atomic_uchar
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unass
