http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54176
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq ---
Just checked it works with the current trunk (after Jon Beniston's recent
patch).
||lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq ---
Works now
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52466
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50927
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq ---
(In reply to jbenis...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #1)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #14 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-25 19:26:31 UTC ---
This gets the C compiler to build; if C++ is enabled, this triggers the cc1
segfault above.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #13 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-25 19:24:24 UTC ---
Author: lekernel
Date: Fri Feb 25 19:24:20 2011
New Revision: 170502
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170502
Log:
2011-02-25 Sebastien Bourdeauducq
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #12 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-25 19:04:07 UTC ---
ok... breaks it, but with a syntax error (seems to have been fixed in the
meantime), not for the cc1 segfault we're looking for.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #11 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-25 18:49:46 UTC ---
Actually, Jon's patch (http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02561.html)
fixes this one problem introduced by Richard's commit. But after Jon's patch is
applied, the n
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #9 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-25 16:40:52 UTC ---
I ran git bisect for this. Here is the result:
74897bc755ddcb5ff67a91570c83e910ed950c7c is the first bad commit
commit 74897bc755ddcb5ff67a91570c83e910ed950c7c
Author: rth
D
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |critical
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #8 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-01 22:00:24 UTC ---
After applying the above patch, the segmentation fault in cc1 is due to a stack
overflow, which is likely to originate from infinite recursion:
(...)
#244 0x08238ddc in emit
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46898
--- Comment #6 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-01 21:03:09 UTC ---
Original/complete patch is at
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-10/msg02561.html
||lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-01 19:08:49 UTC ---
Works with 4.5.2
||lekernel at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #6 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-01 19:05:57 UTC ---
Same as #43726
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 43726 ***
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43726
Sebastien Bourdeauducq changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philpem at philpem dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46692
--- Comment #3 from Sebastien Bourdeauducq
2011-02-01 11:52:15 UTC ---
Author: lekernel
Date: Tue Feb 1 11:52:12 2011
New Revision: 169473
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169473
Log:
PR gcc/46692
* config/lm32/t-lm
19 matches
Mail list logo
