[Bug fortran/36103] gfortran crash with zh_CN locale - error_print error ?

--- Comment #16 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 12:42 --- Created an attachment (id=15567) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15567action=view) new zh_CN.po, compressed by bzip2 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36103

[Bug fortran/36103] gfortran crash with zh_CN locale - error_print error ?

--- Comment #17 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 12:47 --- an updated (again) zh_CN.po uploaded to TP[1], and also in attachment[2], it really protect my gfotran-4.3 from crash, I hope it can works for you. please help check whether it works for you? thanks. [1] http

[Bug fortran/36103] gfortran crash with zh_CN locale - error_print error ?

--- Comment #21 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 14:36 --- Created an attachment (id=15570) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15570action=view) 2nd zh_CN.po, compressed by bzip2 fix almost all the warning by check_po. I don't know the grammer of error_print

[Bug fortran/36103] gfortran crash with zh_CN locale - error_print error ?

--- Comment #22 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-03 14:46 --- Created an attachment (id=15572) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=15572action=view) check_po log for all .mo files in debian gcc-4.3-locales package debian gcc-4.3-locales version is 4.3.0-3 and I

[Bug fortran/36103] gfortran crash with zh_CN locale - error_print error ?

--- Comment #14 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2008-05-02 18:50 --- an updated zh_CN.po uploaded to TP[1], please help check whether it can fix this bug. PS. in emacs's po-mode, po-validate does not warning in this case, any script to check this po file? thanks. [1] http

[Bug c++/30725] New: compile error when meet with ((A()()))

at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lidaobing at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30725

[Bug c++/30725] compile error when meet with ((A()()))

--- Comment #3 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2007-02-07 05:13 --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29234 *** *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 29234 *** -- lidaobing at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/29234] Call to operator() of temporary object wrongly parsed

--- Comment #2 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2007-02-07 05:13 --- *** Bug 30725 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29234

[Bug c/30368] New: wrong result

Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lidaobing at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30368

[Bug c/30368] wrong result

--- Comment #1 from lidaobing at gmail dot com 2007-01-04 14:25 --- orignal reported by RoachCock in newsmth.net BBS -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30368

[Bug libstdc++/29063] New: valarray does not undefine all temp macros

Version: 4.0.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lidaobing at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29063

[Bug c/25575] New: some uninitialized warning disappear when compile without -O

: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lidaobing at gmail dot com http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25575

[Bug c++/23975] New: do not optimize for a 'const double'

Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: lidaobing at gmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-linux

[Bug c++/23975] do not optimize for a 'const double'

-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.1.0 Known to work||2.95.4 3.3.5 3.4.5

[Bug c++/23975] do not optimize for a 'const double'

--- Additional Comments From lidaobing at gmail dot com 2005-09-20 07:04 --- See also Debian bug #328939 http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=328939 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23975