https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109788
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] |[14 Regression]
|gcc/h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109788
Bug ID: 109788
Summary: [14 Regression] gcc/hwint.h:293:61: runtime error:
shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'long
unsigned int
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> > Started with zen tuning revision r13-4839-geef81eefcdc2a5.
>
> The issue is also reproducible with -march=ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109668
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99987
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109780
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109785
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109666
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fiesh at zefix dot tv
--- Comment #13 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
I've got a C++ reduced test-case:
$ cat x.ii
template struct is_same;
template using enable_if_t = _Tp;
template struct reverse_iterator {
_Iterator current;
typedef _Iterator iterator_type;
reverse
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109735
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
Las
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109735
Bug ID: 109735
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in vectorizable_store, at
tree-vect-stmts.cc:8529 since r14-322-g821ef93976e750
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109733
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-05-04
Summary|ICE in ext
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109733
Bug ID: 109733
Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 since
r14-475-g508f082829af68
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-val
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
@Andrew: Will you be able to construct a test-case or do you want me to reduce
the provided one?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
So (long int)(_73 == 0) is changed to (long int)(_73 != 0).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Looking at optimized dump before and after the revision I see an obvious error:
diff -u good bad
--- good2023-05-04 14:12:16.160695781 +0200
+++ bad 2023-05-04 14:11:58.516230125 +0200
@@ -3399,9 +33
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109732
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] gcc |[14 regression] gcc
|m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> 8 spaces -> tab.
May I commit it as obvious with the change?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
So something like this can fix it:
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
index ba132d8a1ce..206adcfec3c 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/sync.md
@@ -61,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
The following generated code reports the warning:
static const char *
output_491 (rtx *operands ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED, rtx_insn *insn ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
#line 53 "/home/marxin/Programming/gcc/gcc/config/riscv/sy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109713
Bug ID: 109713
Summary: [14 Regression] gcc/config/riscv/sync.md:66:1: error:
control reaches end of non-void function
[-Werror=return-type] since r14-406-gbff7c773864479
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[14 regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109711
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|needs-reduction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109695
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109700
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE with address sanitizer |ICE with address sanitizer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109693
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109692
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on concept as default |[12/13/14 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109689
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] ICE at -O1 |[14 Regression] ICE at -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109648
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109645
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109674
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
The solution is probably very similar to libasan library where also __lsan
symbols are used and where we link against ../lsan/.libs/libsanitizer_lsan.a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109674
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109647
Bug ID: 109647
Summary: ranges:6151:14: error: requires clause differs in
template redeclaration rejected by clang++ 16.0.2
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109618
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109619
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109643
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-04-27 00:00:00 |
Summary|[14 Regression] IPA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109533
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109604
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 Regression] ice during |[14 Regression] ICE during
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109598
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jsm28 at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109583
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Fixed now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109594
Bug ID: 109594
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed since
r14-67-g2c800ed8d59cff with ASAN
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109583
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-04-21
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109583
Bug ID: 109583
Summary: [14 Regression] ICE in related_vector_mode, at
stor-layout.cc:537 since r14-22-g2349e69125335d
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109573
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|12.3|11.5
Summary|[11/12/13/14 reg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|13.0|14.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109582
Bug ID: 109582
Summary: riscv/generic.md:28:1: unknown value `smin' for
attribute `type'
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109573
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12/13/14 regression] ICE |[11/12/13/14 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109546
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109564
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Simplified a bit more to:
struct libkeccak_generalised_spec {
int state_size;
int word_size;
} main_gspec;
long gvar;
int libkeccak_degeneralise_spec(struct libkeccak_generalised_spec *spec) {
int st
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109564
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4)
> Created attachment 54887 [details]
> testcase
Note the reduced test-case already started to fail with
r13-1938-g87dd4c8c83768a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
> Many thanks, Martin.
You're welcome!
> PS How do you do this location - by hand or do you have a script to do the
> bisection?
I have a script that uses pre-built GCC binaries:
https://github.com/marxin/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13/14 Regression] |[10/11 Regression] Segfault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 54877
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54877&action=edit
Reduced test-case
Takes 1.77s after the mentioned revision and 0.15s before it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109539
Bug ID: 109539
Summary: [13/14 Regression] Compile-time hog in
gimple-ssa-warn-access.cc since
r13-6706-gadb70c2d1060b3
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109531
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109513
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109490
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Sum
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109462
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109446
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
>
> Maybe it just happens the end to be on the stack of the inner most function
> so it just happens that it is an variable address still.
No, that's not the case, see my previous comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109446
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6)
> > > not sure if we should prevent all of those transforms. But th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109446
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109446
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
The problem here is that we normally preserve memcpy calls and then
__interceptor_memcpy is used from the run-time library. However, in this case
the second argument of memcpy is a known constant and we conve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109480
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 109408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 109408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109303
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 109408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Comment #13 from Martin Liška ---
*** Bug 109408 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109408
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109408
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109392
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109398
Bug ID: 109398
Summary: libiberty/sha1.c:234:11: warning: defining a type
within 'offsetof' is a Clang extension
[-Wgnu-offsetof-extensions]
Product: gcc
Version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109304
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109386
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96919
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101301
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103429
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106816
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105063
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #16 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108241
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #2)
> Patch candidate:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/615048.html
Sorry, this link:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-April/615044.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108241
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109388
Bug ID: 109388
Summary: clang warnings related to Modula-2
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83582
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65534
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80922
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|marxin at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109104
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108640
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 107409, which changed state.
Bug 107409 Summary: Perf loss ~5% on 519.lbm_r SPEC cpu2017 benchmark with
r10-5090-ga9a4edf0e71bba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107409
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109341
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
Summary|[12/13 Regression] I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109342
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Keyw
1 - 100 of 2095 matches
Mail list logo