https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
--- Comment #14 from Matt Thompson ---
Never mind. I'll send attachment to Jerry offline. It's too big for here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
--- Comment #13 from Matt Thompson ---
Okay I have a new reproducer that I'll attach here. It uses the random names.
I see the same behavior:
IFX 2024.1:
Number of Modules | Build Time
- | --
10 | 0.100
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
--- Comment #12 from Matt Thompson ---
Jerry,
Actually, I took a look at my reproducer and it's not quite what I was wanting
(I made a mistake in the Jinja templates). I'm going to work on it now to fix
this up. And I'll look at adding the rando
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
--- Comment #9 from Matt Thompson ---
Jerry,
I tried your patch, but it didn't seem to help my reproducer.
Stock GCC13:
Number of Modules | Build Time
- | --
10 | 0.336674
20 |2.34525
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98426
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot
gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110415
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot
gov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
--- Comment #24 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23)
> so fixed on master, but needed on the open branches - so leaving the PR open
> for now.
Iain, a query: Is the `--without-build-config` flag still needed for XCo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
--- Comment #19 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Chris Jones from comment #18)
> try again with
>
> --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,jit
Ahh. I feel dumb. And I've learned that GCC apparently now has a JIT compiler!
Time to do some reading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
--- Comment #16 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Chris Jones from comment #14)
> Apologies, typo above. I meant to say the --without-build-config workaround
> no longer works with 11.2.0
Huh. I tried it and it seemed to work for me? Well, I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100651
--- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson ---
Iain,
The Linux system would be SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12 SP3. The macOS system
is macOS 11.5.1.
On the Linux machine, I can confirm the error with (I only have some versions
of GCC available):
* 8.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100340
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthew.thompson at nasa dot
gov
: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50838
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50838&action=edit
Reproducing program
This is a bug that is tripped by GC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #34 from Matt Thompson ---
Iain,
Apologies. I forgot about this. Seeing as I'm now using GNU 10.2.0 on my
Macbook...I guess it's working.
I currently do:
../gcc-10.2.0/configure --prefix=$HOME/installed/Core/gcc-gfortran/10.2.0
--e
ormal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
All,
I've recently been experimenting on the Graviton2 processors on AWS and
encountered a possible bug. Namely, -ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #30 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #28)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> > That's fine - essentially, you're building them from source and therefore
> > don't need to worry about --with-gm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #29 from Matt Thompson ---
Also, this did seem to build GCC:
CC="/Users/mathomp4/installed/Core/gcc-gfortran/8.2.0/bin/gcc
--sysroot=/Library/Developer/CommandLineTools/SDKs/MacOSX.sdk"
CXX="/Users/mathomp4/installed/Core/gcc-gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #28 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #27)
> That's fine - essentially, you're building them from source and therefore
> don't need to worry about --with-gmp= configure options etc.
>
> For the record, I'm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #26 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #25)
>
> > Thanks for the explanations. I'm trying a new build now with gcc-8.2.0 as
> > the compiler passed to configure.
> >
> > Here's a(nother dumb) question: let
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #24 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #23)
> --with-sysroot=/opt/iains/SDKs/darwin18-2
> this is the sysroot that will be built into the compiler and used
> automatically when it's invoked (in this ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #22 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #17)
>
> > > b) (remind me) what is the "--with-native-system-header-dir=/usr/include"
> > > meant to provide? It seems
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #21 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #20)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #19)
> > (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #17)
> >
>
> > > Now, I'm not sure that gcc itself needs /usr/include, bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #17 from Matt Thompson ---
Iain,
The (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #16)
> Hi Matt,
>
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #15)
>
> > I seem to still have issues. I downloaded 9.2.0 this morning and built it
> > with:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #15 from Matt Thompson ---
Iain,
I seem to still have issues. I downloaded 9.2.0 this morning and built it with:
$ ../gcc-9.2.0/configure
--prefix=/Users/mathomp4/installed/Core/gcc-gfortran/9.2.0
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #12 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> > > (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #8)
>
>
> > I don't usu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #10 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #9)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #8)
> >
> > I just tried to rebuild gcc 9.1.0 on my laptop, and I got the same error at
> > the same point in make install
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #8 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #7)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #4)
> > > > Also: I do have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #6 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #4)
> > Also: I do have all the log files still, so if you'd like anything grep'ed
> > in there, let me know.
>
> not at th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #3 from Matt Thompson ---
For the grep:
[(544) 01:48 PM] $ grep CFI gcc/auto-host.h
/* Define 0/1 if your assembler supports CFI directives. */
#define HAVE_GAS_CFI_DIRECTIVE 0
#define HAVE_GAS_CFI_PERSONALITY_DIRECTIVE 1
#define HAV
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90330
--- Comment #4 from Matt Thompson ---
Also: I do have all the log files still, so if you'd like anything grep'ed in
there, let me know.
: other
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
All,
I am trying to build GCC 9.1.0 on my Macbook today, but it's failing in the
make install step. The make step was happy, but when I try to install, it
fails.
: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46199
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
All,
A colleague of mine encountered an issue with 8.2.0 (but it's also in 7.3.0 at
least). We believe it might be a bug sinc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87644
--- Comment #1 from Matt Thompson ---
Further update from a colleague:
Some observations:
* The function result having the name 'parameters' has no effect. It's from
this line "parameters = get()".
* The 'public :: get' must be present in the
t: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
This is a weird ICE recently encountered using gfortran 8.2.0 on SLES11, CentOS
7, and macOS High Sierra in a large code, but I managed to whittle it down
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
--- Comment #6 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> This has been fixed by Paul's patch, closing.
>
> Thanks for the bug report!
Will this patch appear in GCC 8? 7.4? I only ask because I had another bug (bug
590
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #14 from Matt Thompson ---
Query: What version of GCC will fix this? It was reported fixed last year, but
GCC 7.3.0 still ICEs out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34640
--- Comment #39 from Matt Thompson ---
Thanks! I'll keep an eye out for this in an upcoming release so I can test with
GEOS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77344
--- Comment #2 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> I get a lot of "*error: instruction requires: AVX-512 ISA" when compiling
> gettau.F90 on x86_64-apple-darwin15, Xcode 7.3.1.
I've never tried this on Dar
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 39485
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39485&action=edit
Tarball with offending code and GNUmakefile
I have a code that whe
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
This program:
program test
implicit none
character(len=:), allocatable :: s
s = 'a'
associate(ss => s)
print*,ss
end a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #11 from Matt Thompson ---
Bug still present in GCC 6.1.0:
(907) $ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 6.1.0
Copyright (C) 2016 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions. There is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.9.1 |5.1.0
--- Comment #9 from Matt Thompson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66058
--- Comment #3 from Matt Thompson ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> (In reply to Matt Thompson from comment #1)
> > Addendum,
> >
> > I've tried various gfortran flags, but for the life of me, none seem to get
> > this to work.
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66058
--- Comment #1 from Matt Thompson ---
Addendum,
I've tried various gfortran flags, but for the life of me, none seem to get
this to work.
Matt
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 35489
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35489&action=edit
Reproducer of compiler bug
I've discovered what I think is a bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
Matt Thompson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.8.1 |4.9.1
--- Comment #7 from Matt Thompson
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #6 from Matt Thompson ---
Has there been any work/success on this bug? It's still affecting our ability
to compile this code with gfortran.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #5 from Matt Thompson ---
An additional thought. You have a reduced test case which dies in Comment #3
(which fails for gfortran 4.9). However, you can make something similar which
succeeds:
program main
implicit none
type :: MA
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59093
--- Comment #4 from Matt Thompson ---
Any progress on this bug in the latest versions of the compiler?
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: matthew.thompson at nasa dot gov
Created attachment 31201
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31201&action=edit
Pre-processed source file
I'm getting an ICE
50 matches
Mail list logo
