[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #3 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-09-26 17:24 --- I would actually think that the backslash should be removed by the shell but it is obviously not what happens. I believe your explanation is correct and gcc-3.3.6 did not have the check. However, it

[Bug other/37654] gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-09-26 15:41 --- Happens also with 4.2.1 but not with 3.3.6. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37654

[Bug other/37654] New: gcc-4.3.1: stripping trailing backspace from args fools gcc

2008-09-26 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37654

[Bug target/36831] sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure

2008-08-13 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #5 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-08-13 10:39 --- See "3.4.2" in comment #1. ;-) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36831

[Bug bootstrap/36831] sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure

2008-07-16 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #3 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-07-16 13:59 --- This gave me a working bootstrapped compiler: AS=/usr/ccs/bin/as LD=/usr/ccs/bin/ld NM=/usr/local/bin/nm RANLIB=/usr/local/bin/ranlib STRIP=/usr/local/bin/strip BOOT_CFLAGS="-pipe -fno-s

[Bug bootstrap/36831] sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure

2008-07-15 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #2 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-07-15 07:05 --- Does this help? bash-3.00# objdump -Dxzs --prefix-addresses ./prev-gcc/crt1.o > /tmp/crt1.prev bash-3.00# objdump -Dxzs --prefix-addresses ./gcc/crt1.o > /tmp/crt1.new bash-3.00# diff /tm

[Bug bootstrap/36831] sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure

2008-07-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2008-07-15 06:55 --- Currently I have: bash-3.00# gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc/sparc-sun-solaris2.6/3.4.2/specs Configured with: ../configure --with-as=/usr/ccs/bin/as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld

[Bug bootstrap/36831] New: sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure

2008-07-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
ering directory `/usr/scratch/gcc-4.3.1/destdir' make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/scratch/gcc-4.3.1/destdir' rm -f stage_current make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/scratch/gcc-4.3.1/destdir' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: ./cc1-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: ./cc1obj-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! ./crt1.o differs ./crti.o differs ./crtn.o differs ./gcrt1.o differs make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/scratch/gcc-4.3.1/destdir' ... # # uname -a SunOS ultra10 5.6 Generic_105181-39 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-5_10 Solaris # What should I do now? -- Summary: sparc-sun-solaris2.6: Bootstrap comparison failure Product: gcc Version: 4.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36831

[Bug bootstrap/34523] New: configure does not recognize --with-cpu=arm926ejs but --with-cpu=arm926ej-s

2007-12-18 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34523

[Bug middle-end/24998] [4.2/4.3 Regression] Build failure: undefined symbol __floatunsitf

2007-12-17 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #36 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-17 10:08 --- I am getting this with 4.2.2 on ARM926EJ-S processor during bootstrap. rm -rf libbackend.a ar rc libbackend.a double-int.o tree-chrec.o tree-scalar-evolution.o tree-data-ref.o tree-cfg.o tree

[Bug bootstrap/34494] -V option should be compatible with -B at least, possible others as well

2007-12-16 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #3 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-16 14:00 --- ??? But how is the bootstrap supposed to continue? Or was it caused by another error which I have overlooked? I am sorry then. :( -- mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz changed

[Bug bootstrap/34494] -V option should be compatible with -B at least, possible others as well

2007-12-16 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-16 11:21 --- Created an attachment (id=14776) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14776&action=view) config.statuses_and_logs.tgz tar cvf - ./prev-libiberty/config.status ./prev-libde

[Bug bootstrap/34494] New: -V option should be compatible with -B at least, possible others as well

2007-12-16 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
ion: 4.2.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34494

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-16 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #12 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-16 11:06 --- Please update the docs first and update configure to check for at least some of the required features. Users are not going to realize their utilities do not conform to POSIX completely. And so far

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-15 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #8 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 14:01 --- The hardware is a Western Digital MyBookWorldII small NAS system, and it is bundled with the linux and just these tools. Everybody is glad that at least a working old gcc is available. We just can&#

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-15 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #5 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 11:00 --- Created an attachment (id=14767) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14767&action=view) fixinc.in.patch There was one more left ... -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-15 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #4 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 10:59 --- None of these works: find . -type l -or -type d -print find . -type l OR -type d -print find . -type l or -type d -print -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #2 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 03:31 --- Created an attachment (id=14764) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14764&action=view) fixinc.in.patch -- mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz

[Bug bootstrap/34474] find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
--- Comment #1 from mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz 2007-12-15 03:29 --- Created an attachment (id=14763) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14763&action=view) fixinc.in.patch -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474

[Bug bootstrap/34474] New: find from BusyBox v1.2.2 does not support logical OR (-o argument)

2007-12-14 Thread mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz
FIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: mmokrejs at ribosome dot natur dot cuni dot cz http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34474