[Bug c++/67466] New: Project segfaulting, working with other compilers

2015-09-05 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
Component: c++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- First of all, sorry but I am not able to create a MWE which is able to reproduce the bug. I found this issue re-compiling the Voxelands project (https://gitlab.com

[Bug c++/67466] Project segfaulting, working with other compilers

2016-09-12 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67466 morandidodo at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.1 Known to fail

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] New: Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

2016-09-22 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39673 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39673&action=edit Asm code of the main, generated by gcc and

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

2016-09-22 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #6 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > First of all you need to make sure to have recent glibc installed to benefit > from > the vectorized math routines therein. Otherwise

[Bug tree-optimization/77689] Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss

2016-09-22 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689 --- Comment #8 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7) > (In reply to morandidodo from comment #6) > > > However, I just made some tests, and it seems that the performance lost is > > pa

[Bug libstdc++/77704] New: Data race on std::regex

2016-09-23 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- The thread sanitizer says that there is a data race during regex construction. Here a simple test: #include #include #include static const std::string test_string

[Bug libgomp/77744] New: Data race on std::regex_iterator using openmp

2016-09-26 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
: libgomp Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com CC: jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- Created attachment 39687 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39687&action=edit Output of the test

[Bug libstdc++/77744] Data race on std::regex_iterator using openmp

2016-09-26 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77744 --- Comment #2 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > If the C++ standards allows these to be used without locking, then it is > likely a bug in libstdc++, not libgomp. Sorry, my fault ;)

[Bug libstdc++/77744] Data race on std::regex_iterator using openmp

2016-09-26 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77744 --- Comment #6 from morandidodo at gmail dot com --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) > Pedantically this isn't valid, because you are mixing C++11 features > (lambdas) with OpenMP, which doesn't support C++11 even in 4

[Bug sanitizer/78158] New: Strange data race detection with thread sanitizer

2016-10-29 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
: sanitizer Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com CC: dodji at gcc dot gnu.org, dvyukov at gcc dot gnu.org, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org, kcc at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- I am having an issue

[Bug libstdc++/66456] New: regex memory corruption on large input strings

2015-06-08 Thread morandidodo at gmail dot com
: libstdc++ Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: morandidodo at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- I noticed a memory corruption with regex when using long input strings in combination with multiple occurrences of a pattern. I built a simple testcase to verify that