[Bug middle-end/108154] Inappropriate -Wstringop-overread in the C99 [static n] func param decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108154 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/97048] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wstringop-overread warnings

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97048 Bug 97048 depends on bug 108154, which changed state. Bug 108154 Summary: Inappropriate -Wstringop-overread in the C99 [static n] func param decl https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108154 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/84774] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wrestrict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84774 Bug 84774 depends on bug 107069, which changed state. Bug 107069 Summary: string assignment triggers warning https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107069 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug tree-optimization/105329] [12/13 Regression] Bogus restrict warning when assigning 1-char string literal to std::string since r12-3347-g8af8abfbbace49e6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105329 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de --- Comment #23

[Bug c++/107069] string assignment triggers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107069 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug tree-optimization/107038] [13 Regression] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow= since r13-2789-gb40b3035879cf695

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107038 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- Just a quick note from what I see in GDB. The warning is issued by the 2nd run of the waccess pass (-fdump-tree-waccess2) for the following statement in bb 22 in pread(): iftmp.21_88 = __pread_alias (_50,

[Bug c/106988] subscripting a string literal is not an integer constant expression but __builtin_strlen is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106988 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|DUPLICATE |--- Status|RESOLVED

[Bug c/106988] New: subscripting a string literal is not an integer constant expression but __builtin_strlen is

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106988 Bug ID: 106988 Summary: subscripting a string literal is not an integer constant expression but __builtin_strlen is Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/106931] [12/13 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive -O3 -fno-tree-vectorize with loop unrolling since r12-3300-gece28da924ddda8b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106931 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12/13 Regression] |[12/13 Regression] |-W

[Bug tree-optimization/106868] [12/13 Regression] Bogus -Wdangling-pointer warning with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868 --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #2) ... Actually, scratch that, sorry. Richard is right that the false positive is due to a bug in the warning code. The following patch resolves it: diff --git a/gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/106868] [12/13 Regression] Bogus -Wdangling-pointer warning with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106868 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > Confirmed. > > [local count: 1073741824]: > alloc (&q); > q.0_1 = q; > *p_4(D) = q.0_1; > q ={v} {CLOBBER(eol)}; > a_8 = __builtin_memcpy (q.0_1, "", 1); > *a_

[Bug middle-end/106776] Unexpected use-after-free warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106776 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/106757] [12/13 Regression] Incorrect "writing 1 byte into a region of size 0" on a vectorized loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106757 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-26 Blocks|

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 105348, which changed state. Bug 105348 Summary: Overly aggressive -Warray-bounds after conditional https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105348 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/105348] Overly aggressive -Warray-bounds after conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105348 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org St

[Bug tree-optimization/106247] GCC12 warning in Eigen: array subscript is partly outside array bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106247 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|2022-07-10 00

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 106446, which changed state. Bug 106446 Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive on downcast under condition https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106446 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/106446] -Warray-bounds false positive on downcast under condition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106446 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/106559] [10/11/12/13 Regression] Spurious warning -Wformat-truncation (regression from 9)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106559 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Bl

[Bug c/100420] unspecified VLA bound formatted as [0] instead of [*] in -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100420 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/101605] bogus -Wvla-parameter in same bound expression with differently named parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101605 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2021-07-23 00:00:00 |2022-08-16 Known to fail|

[Bug middle-end/98109] Seemingly wrong warnings from -Wnonnull when combined with -O2 -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98109 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Bernd Buschinski from comment #4) > Can someone tell me if this should be a new bug or is just a duplicate? It's the same bug. The sanitizer transforms the source code into the following IR (not

[Bug tree-optimization/106297] [12/13 Regression] stringop-overflow misbehaviour on atomic since r12-4725-g88b504b7a8c5affb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106297 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||12.1.0, 13.0 Blocks|

[Bug middle-end/105746] vector::resize causes Warray-bounds when optimizer uses __builtin_memcpy or __builtin_memmove since r12-2793-g81d6cdd335ffc60c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105746 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end --- Comment #2 from Martin Se

[Bug c/106264] [10/11/12/13 Regression] spurious -Wunused-value on a folded frexp, modf, and remquo calls with unused result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The most likely culprit is r261705.

[Bug c/106264] New: spurious -Wunused-value on a folded frexp, modf, and remquo calls with unused result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106264 Bug ID: 106264 Summary: spurious -Wunused-value on a folded frexp, modf, and remquo calls with unused result Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/97185] inconsistent builtin elimination for impossible range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97185 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- There's a heuristic for ranges of allocation sizes to exclude zero (size_range_flags) that comes into play here. The actual range isn't "impossible" in the sense it's necessarily invalid. It just means the s

[Bug middle-end/101836] __builtin_object_size(P->M, 1) where M is an array and the last member of a struct fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836 --- Comment #20 from Martin Sebor --- Well, I just "asked" for such an option the same way you asked for -fstrict-flex-arrays in comment #3, because I believe it would be useful to make the BOS improvements you're looking for available even to c

[Bug middle-end/101836] __builtin_object_size(P->M, 1) where M is an array and the last member of a struct fails

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101836 --- Comment #18 from Martin Sebor --- The zero size case exists (and is documented) solely as a substitute for flexible array members. Treating is as an ordinary array would disable that extension. It might be appropriate to provide a separate

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 105762, which changed state. Bug 105762 Summary: [12/13 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positives for integer-to-pointer casts since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105762

[Bug middle-end/105762] [12/13 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positives for integer-to-pointer casts since r12-2132-ga110855667782dac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105762 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID See Also|

[Bug tree-optimization/84774] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wrestrict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84774 Bug 84774 depends on bug 93517, which changed state. Bug 93517 Summary: bogus -Wrestrict on sprintf with unknown strings bounded by array size https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93517 What|Removed |Ad

[Bug middle-end/93517] bogus -Wrestrict on sprintf with unknown strings bounded by array size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/105604] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi with vla in struct and sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE:

[Bug c/105689] Bogus `-Wstringop-overflow=` after accessing field, then containing struct (wrong "region size")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105689 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- It is because of CSE. The warning sees this IL: _1 = &me_3(D)->sub.field1; access_1 (_1); access_2 (_1); and so it warns for the second call because the size of me->sub.field1 passed to it is smaller

[Bug tree-optimization/105585] [12/13 Regression] Spurious stringop-overflow warning with since r12-4725-g88b504b7a8c5affb

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105585 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor --- The purpose of the internal_p flag documented in the attr_access class is more general than to tell a VLA-like argument from an ordinary array/pointer form ("Set for an attribute added internally rather than

[Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor --- The dollar sign in the internal attr_access string implies a VLA bound and the attr_access::vla_bounds() function queries the VLA bounds. That should make it possible to distinguish the two cases. Unlike th

[Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Incidentally, __builtin_dynamic_object_size returns the size of a VLA parameter in both mininum and maximum modes. In f0 below, the size of the A array is at least N bytes but it could be more, so based on m

[Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor --- The VLA bounds were removed from parameter declarations in the fix for pr97172; there weren't relied on by middle-end warnings then and still aren't today.

[Bug middle-end/104854] -Wstringop-overread should not warn for strnlen, strndup and strncmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104854 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69517] SEGV on a VLA with excess initializer elements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/71319] unnecessary call to __strcat_chk emitted after buffer reset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71319 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/85741] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wformat-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741 Bug 85741 depends on bug 77721, which changed state. Bug 77721 Summary: -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug middle-end/77721] -Wformat-truncation not uses arg range for converted vars

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77721 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Blocks|

[Bug c/79554] Zero length format string passed to fprintf under if statement causes error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79554 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/82601] missing uninitialized warning for INTENT(OUT) argument with -O0 / -Og

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82601 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW CC|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/82608] missing -Warray-bounds on an out-of-bounds VLA index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82608 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/83429] Incorrect line number reported by -Wformat-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83429 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/84561] -Wstringop-truncation with -O2 depends on strncpy's size type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84561 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/84577] snprintf with null buffer not eliminated when return value is in a known range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84577 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Known to fail|

[Bug ipa/84603] -finline-limit not accepted in attribute and #pragma optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84603 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/85650] Additional warnings when -fsanitize=undefined is used with -Wstringop-truncation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85650 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/87034] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Wformat-overflow on a sprintf %s with a wide string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87034 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/88059] Spurious stringop-overflow warning with strlen, malloc and strncpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88059 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/88771] Misleading -Werror=array-bounds error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88771 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org | Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/88780] [9/10/11/12 Regression] bogus -Wstringop-truncation for copying as many bytes from a string as its length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88780 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/89678] Bogus -Wstringop-truncation on strncat with bound that depends on strlen of source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89678 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/56456] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Warray-bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456 Bug 56456 depends on bug 90752, which changed state. Bug 90752 Summary: missing -Warray-bounds accessing the result of string functions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug tree-optimization/90752] missing -Warray-bounds accessing the result of string functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90752 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug middle-end/90904] vec assignment and copying undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90904 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/90959] hash_map can be copied but leads to a double-free after assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90959 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug driver/90983] [9 Regression] manual documents `-Wno-stack-usage` flag, but it is unrecognized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90983 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/91076] wrong class-key in mentioned in a diagnostic note

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91076 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/91147] strlen of conditional plus index in known range not folded

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91147 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/91490] [9 Regression] bogus argument missing terminating nul warning on strlen of a flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91490 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/91584] [9 Regression] Bogus warning from -Warray-bounds during string assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91584 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug middle-end/91848] missing warning on strcpy past the end of a member of an array with variable index

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91848 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug ipa/92799] [9 Regression] ICE on a weakref function definition followed by a declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92799 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/94040] [9 Regression] ICE on a call to an invalid redeclaration of strftime

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94040 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug c++/94346] [9 Regression] ICE due to handle_copy_attribute since r9-3982

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94346 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/94655] [10 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow on implicit string assignment with vectorized char store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94655 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/94923] False positive -Wclass-memaccess with trivially copyable std::optional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94923 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/95072] [10/11/12 Regression] -Warray-bounds false positive with flexible array bounds (regression from GCC 9)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95072 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/95189] [9 Regression] memcmp being wrongly stripped like strcmp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95189 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/96171] [10 Regression] ICE on invalid VLA argument declaration and attribute access

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96171 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/96963] [10 Regression] -Wstringop-overflow false positive on -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize when assigning consecutive char struct members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96963 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW --- Comment #14 from Martin Sebor --

[Bug c/101289] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-paramater warning when using const for vla param

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101289 Bug 101289 depends on bug 97548, which changed state. Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 What|Removed

[Bug c/101604] [meta-bug] bogus/missing -Wvla-parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101604 Bug 101604 depends on bug 97548, which changed state. Bug 97548 Summary: [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 What|Removed

[Bug c/97548] [11 Regression] bogus -Wvla-parameter on a bound expression involving a parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97548 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/97631] [10 Regression] bogus "writing one too many bytes" warning for memcpy with strlen argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97631 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/99121] [9/10/11 Regression] ICE tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in get_len, at tree.h:6037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99121 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug c/99295] [9 Regression] documentation on __attribute__((malloc)) is wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99295 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/99475] [10/11 Regression] bogus -Warray-bounds accessing an array element of empty structs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99475 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/101665] -fno-delete-null-pointer checks ineffective for attribute nonnull parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101665 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/104069] -Werror=use-after-free false positive on elfutils-0.186

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104069 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/104076] bogus -Wdangling-pointer on a conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104076 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/84050] [9/10/11/12 Regression] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a struct array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84050 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/84318] [9/10/11/12 Regression] attribute deprecated on function templates different than class templates

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84318 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug c++/83430] missing warning for specifying larger snprintf bound than destination size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83430 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org | Assignee|msebor at gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/80420] missing -Wformat-overfow on snprintf with excessive bound

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80420 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||85741 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/70588] SIGBUS on a VLA larger than SIZE_MAX / 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/70076] no exception for excess initializer elements in a multidimensional VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70076 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/67872] missing -Warray-bounds warning, bogus -Wmaybe-uninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67872 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug preprocessor/41540] -dM -E doesn't #define __FILE__

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41540 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|NEW Assignee|msebor at gcc dot

[Bug tree-optimization/40635] [12 Regression] bogus name and location in 'may be used uninitialized' warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|msebor at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/104969] Likely a false positive of -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104969 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/104965] [11/12 Regression] Yet another -Warray-bounds false positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104965 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug middle-end/99578] [11/12 Regression] gcc-11 -Warray-bounds or -Wstringop-overread warning when accessing a pointer from integer literal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578 --- Comment #31 from Martin Sebor --- I suppose we could move this warning under level 2 until this is handled better. -Warray-bounds already has two levels with level 2 being more noisy, and it might be useful to add a level to -Wstringop-overr

[Bug middle-end/104492] [12 Regression] Bogus dangling pointer warning at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104492 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >