--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 05:02
---
> You are running your program on the target right? Then it is a bug on the
target. The dynamic loader
> still is invoked because well libjava still invokes it.
I believe you as I still have glibc-2.
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 04:20
---
> This is a glibc bug in the dynamic loader. Try a newer glibc.
Is this a glibc bug on the target or the host machine? I believe my host would
have a very recent glibc, my target has an ancient glibc bu
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 03:52
---
Perhaps the above link does not apply, my host system doesn't contain a
"dl-machine.h" anywhere on the file system nor did a "glibc-current" directory
turn up.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 03:25
---
Ok after recompiling the static HelloWorld.exe with the patched toolchain the
following happens upon execution on the target:
===code
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 02:35
---
Ok, tried the same fix on another test machine, this one running Mandriva 2005
LE x86_64 and the arm-linux-gcc-4.0.1 toolchain with the boehm-gc patch compiled
fine.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-04 00:14
---
After patching the gcc-4.0.1 source in boehm-gc/include/private/gcconfig.h, I
get the following errors when I go to "make". I did not get this errors before
editing gcconfig.h, however they ap
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 19:52
---
Subject: Re: arm-linux-gcj cross-compiler generates bad assembler-code
> > (gdb) bt
> > #0 GC_push_all_eager (bottom=0x0, top=0x390a8 "") at
> > ../../../gcc-3.4.3/boehm-gc/mark.
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 19:46
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I think it is the same problem with Boehm-GC on ARM/Linux that
> has been solved in upstream sources.
Has this fix been officially submited to gcc for inclusion in 4.0.X?
A
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 01:39
---
(In reply to comment #7)
> First don't add me to the CC, I read gcc-bugs.
I appologize.
> As I said this is a bug in boehm-gc, you might to see if you can use the
latest version of boehm-gc on
&g
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
||org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/sh
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 01:02
---
Is it neccissary for the host-to-host version of gcc to be the exact same
version as the host-to-target gcc version being built? I doubt this is the case
as this would present major imcompatibility issues for
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-09-01 00:57
---
(In reply to comment #2)
> From your back trace this is in the GC and not really in an issue for the
front-end or class library.
>
> Also from the looks of it, you using gcj 4.0.0 but using 3.4.3'
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-31 21:00
---
I now have a stacktrace from someone on this issue from gdb:
They used the following configuration parameters to build arm-linux-gcc cross
compilers:
The following was tested with gcc-3.4.3 and gcc-4.0.1
execution on arm target
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: java
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ngmlinux at gmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-31 20:18
---
I now have a stacktrace from someone on this issue from gdb:
They used the following configuration parameters to build arm-linux-gcc cross
compilers:
The following was tested with gcc-3.4.3 and gcc-4.0.1
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 18:19
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
It appears the Segmentation Fault error I get at runtime is common and
already documented as bug# 5487. The bug was clo
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 18:01
---
I've been able to reproducte the same exact issue in arm-linux-gcc-4.0.1 which I
build from source by the following process:
===code
../conf
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 17:11
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
For reference the exact compile line I gave was:
===code===
/usr/loc
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 17:07
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> You want --main=MAINCLASS (or in this case HelloWorldApp).
Ok, I fixed that and it seem to cross compile fine witho
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 14:22
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> do build it this way: gcj HelloWorld.java --main=HelloWorld -g -o
> HelloWorld.exe
Still reporting an error, al
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 07:37
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
Pinski-
That last configuration I sent you seems to almost work. Make finally
finished and then I ran "make insta
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 06:08
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> You did not read my suggestion of doing --with-as=PATHTOAS.
I had --with-gnu-as=/usr/local/bin/arm-linux-as in m
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 04:24
---
Bug reopened
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 04:23
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
I was able to find an arm-linux-as and arm-linux-ld under
/usr/local/bin, hopefully these are the correct files and versio
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 01:59
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> You built binutils, right?
Yes I just built binutils 2.16.1 by the following procedure:
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 01:45
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> You want to use --with-as=PATH_TO_AS and likewise for --with-ld=.
I'm not sure exactly what I'm looking
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 01:05
---
bug reopened
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From ngmlinux at gmail dot com 2005-08-26 00:52
---
Subject: Re: Building gcc-4.0.1 toolchain for arm-linux fails durring "make"
> Not a bug, configure is picking up the wrong as because you did not supply
> one to it.
I don't think that&
gcc
Version: 4.0.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P2
Component: other
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: ngmlinux at gmail dot com
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23569
29 matches
Mail list logo
