https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105039
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98886
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #9 from Nick Clifton ---
A revised patch to fix this PR has been prroposed on gcc-patches:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-January/589277.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99188
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> This patch breaks MinGW, see PR 101779
But it can be fixed by:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28207
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101779
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100968
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99935
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 50777
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50777&action=edit
Proposed patch
Here is a possible patch for the problem, adding a recursion limit to the
demangle_path() functio
: demangler
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The rust portion of the libiberty testsuite fails when run on a big-endian
host:
./test-demangle < ./libiberty/testsuite/rust-demangle-expected
FAIL at line
: demangler
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The rust demangler can be pushed into an infinite loop, triggering stack
exhaustion:
% cat pr27963
# Reproduced from binutils PR 27963.
# Note - the expected output is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88629
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Trupti Pardeshi from comment #9)
> May I know, in which version of binutils this fix is available?
2.35. Which should be available in August, all being well.
Cheers
Nick
PS. The fix is alr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85978
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85978
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Mon Sep 30 15:27:14 2019
New Revision: 276306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix compile time warning about building the FRV backend by adding missing b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59205
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 59205, which changed state.
Bug 59205 Summary: config/iq2000/iq2000.c:2188: possible cut'n'paste error ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59205
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59205
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Mon Sep 30 15:18:14 2019
New Revision: 276304
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=276304&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove the iq2000_select_section function the iq2000 backend - it never
pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90924
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |MOVED
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi tfx,
Thank you vert much for reporting this bug. Unfortunately the binutils
project does not maintain the libiberty library (which contains the
cplus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90045
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
The patch recently applied for PR 89394 also appears to fix this PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89394
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Wed Apr 10 14:44:47 2019
New Revision: 270258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix a stack exhaustion bug in libiberty's demangler when decoding a
pathalo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90028
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #17
||2019-03-21
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
I have proposed a patch to fix this bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-03/msg01048.html
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Sorry, but a leak of 10 bytes is just not serious enough to be worth
worrying about. Especially when these programs do not run continuously
but instead terminate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Dec 11 11:59:53 2018
New Revision: 267020
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=267020&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix a failure in the libiberty testsuite by increasing the demangle recursi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Tanaya Patil from comment #7)
> Should we expect this fix to be in Binutil 2.32?
Yes. :-)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4)
> I am expecting that
>
> [hjl@gnu-cfl-1 libiberty]$ c++filt
> _ZN4modc6parser8sequenceINS_9astParser13LocatedParserINS0_9ParserRefINS2_UlRN
> S2_16TokenParserInputEE_EE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88409
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 85122, which changed state.
Bug 85122 Summary: Stack Overflow(Stack Exhaustion) in demangle related
functions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85122
What|Removed |Added
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #13 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed by commit 266886.
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed with commit 266886.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86656
Bug 86656 depends on bug 85454, which changed state.
Bug 85454 Summary: Multiple memory corruptions in objdump / C++ name demangler
(binuitils-2.30-15ubuntu1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85454
What|Removed
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed with commit 266886
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Fixed with commit 266886.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87335
--- Comment #12 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018
New Revision: 266886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enable
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87681
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018
New Revision: 266886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87636
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018
New Revision: 266886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87675
--- Comment #5 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018
New Revision: 266886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87350
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Dec 7 10:33:30 2018
New Revision: 266886
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=266886&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a recursion limit to libiberty's demangling code. The limit is enabled
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70681
--- Comment #10 from Nick Clifton ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #9)
> Nick: Any update on this PR?
Gosh no. I must admit that I had totally forgotten about this PR.
I am not sure what state it is in now. I doubt if it is importan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31377
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi George,
(In reply to George Ellery from comment #0)
> room = columns - 3 - MAX (col_width, item_width);
> if (room > columns)
> room = columns - 3 - MAX (col_width, item_width);
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86813, which changed state.
Bug 86813 Summary: xstormy16 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86813
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 16:13:32 2018
New Revision: 263266
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263266&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86813
* config/stormy16/stormy16.c (TARGET_HAVE_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86810, which changed state.
Bug 86810 Summary: v850 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86810
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 15:57:06 2018
New Revision: 263264
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263264&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86810
* config/v850/v850.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86803, which changed state.
Bug 86803 Summary: rx port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86803
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 14:35:10 2018
New Revision: 263263
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263263&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86803
* config/rx/rx.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION_S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86797, which changed state.
Bug 86797 Summary: msp430 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86797
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 14:02:32 2018
New Revision: 263259
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263259&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86797
* config/msp430/msp430.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86791, which changed state.
Bug 86791 Summary: mcore port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86791
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 13:30:40 2018
New Revision: 263258
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263258&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86791
* config/mcore/mcore.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULA
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86789, which changed state.
Bug 86789 Summary: m32r port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86789
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 12:31:29 2018
New Revision: 263256
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263256&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86789
* config/m32r/m32r.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 12:14:52 2018
New Revision: 263255
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263255&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86787
* config/iq2000/iq2000.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86782, which changed state.
Bug 86782 Summary: frv port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86787, which changed state.
Bug 86787 Summary: iq2000 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86787
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86782
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 11:46:06 2018
New Revision: 263254
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263254&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86782
* config/frv/frv.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATION
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86772
Bug 86772 depends on bug 86781, which changed state.
Bug 86781 Summary: fr30 port needs updating for CVE-2017-5753
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86781
--- Comment #1 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Aug 2 11:24:47 2018
New Revision: 263253
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=263253&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/86781
* config/fr30/fr30.c (TARGET_HAVE_SPECULATI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86170
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
--- Comment #7 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Mon Jun 18 10:39:01 2018
New Revision: 261697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Ensure that control characters in user supplied error and warning messages
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84195
--- Comment #4 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Fri Jun 15 15:25:16 2018
New Revision: 261633
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261633&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Force user provided warning and error messages to only occupy one line.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847
--- Comment #16 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi H.J.
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #15)
> It should be fixed in linker.
OK - so how does the linker distinguish between a file that only contains
debug information, none of which is needed, and a fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84847
--- Comment #14 from Nick Clifton ---
Created attachment 43643
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=43643&action=edit
Proposed patch
Hi Guys.
Here is a possible patch, although it is a bit hackish.
Richard might not like it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84145
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82518
--- Comment #8 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Aldy,
> Do we have a way of testing armeb, either through a simulator or through
> some aarch64 with magic flags?
GDB has an ARM simulator which is OK unless you need to test some of the newer
features li
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Patch applied.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80993
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue Aug 29 13:20:54 2017
New Revision: 251410
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=251410&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/80993
* gcc/config/msp430/msp430.c (msp430_attr):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78818
--- Comment #2 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Thu Jun 15 13:38:52 2017
New Revision: 249222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=249222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix problems with the MSP430 port's handling of persistent data.
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78838
--- Comment #3 from Nick Clifton ---
Author: nickc
Date: Tue May 30 10:49:29 2017
New Revision: 248674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=248674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78838
gcc * config/msp430/msp430.c (gen_prefix): Retu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
Nick Clifton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
--- Comment #17 from Nick Clifton ---
Hi Guys,
(In reply to Eduard Braun from comment #15)
> > Setting status to resolved/fixed.
>
> I don't think this is merged yet!
> There's only a patch MINGW-packages, if this works out it should be fixed
>
||nickc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Nick Clifton ---
Potential patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-01/msg01949.html
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
