[Bug c++/26468] New: correct code doesn't compile (global namespace qualification)

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26468

[Bug c++/26469] New: correct code doesn't compile (global namespace qualification)

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26469

[Bug c++/26470] New: correct code doesn't compile (global namespace qualification)

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26470

[Bug c++/26471] New: no warning available when binding a temporary to a const reference member

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
Version: 4.0.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26471

[Bug c++/26471] no warning available when binding a temporary to a const reference member

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #2 from o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2006-02-25 20:15 --- Sure, those additional brackets I missed because I created this case from scratch (and then forgot about it). But the other points I don't see: I seems trivial for gcc to find this sort of error: Just

[Bug c++/26471] no warning available when binding a temporary to a const reference member

2006-02-25 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Comment #4 from o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2006-02-25 21:21 --- Y y((X())); How does GCC know that the temporary that holds X() is going to be stored in y? By the definition of Y, obviously. There seems to be a very special way of how GCC is parsing the input

[Bug c++/26263] New: defective locale named fr_CA

2006-02-13 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26263

[Bug c++/21685] New: Internal compiler error on correct code

2005-05-20 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org

[Bug c++/21685] Internal compiler error on correct code

2005-05-20 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2005-05-20 21:30 --- Oh, yes, I did overlook that I had to pass also that object union_f as parameter --- thanks for telling me! Now the code compiles again. So it's an internal compiler error on incorrect code

[Bug c++/19279] New: wrong code due to name import from the implementation of the standard library

2005-01-05 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug bootstrap/17975] New: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

2004-10-13 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
: P2 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17975

[Bug bootstrap/17975] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

2004-10-13 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-13 17:52 --- sorry, didn't want to do anything here, but just updating the page seems to have created something ?!?! -- What|Removed |Added

[Bug bootstrap/17940] New: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

2004-10-11 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
: P2 Component: bootstrap AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17940

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

2004-10-11 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11 20:02 --- Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 07:36:22PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Additional Comments From

[Bug bootstrap/17940] make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled

2004-10-11 Thread o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk
--- Additional Comments From o dot kullmann at swansea dot ac dot uk 2004-10-11 20:37 --- Subject: Re: make bootstrap fails because libiberty-components are not compiled SOLVED On Mon, Oct 11, 2004 at 08:14:00PM -, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote: --- Additional