http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
Bug #: 53436
Summary: Volatile behaves strange with OpenMP
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
--- Comment #4 from o.mangold at googlemail dot com 2012-05-22 07:45:46 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> The testcase is not valid OpenMP, there is no flush operation in between the
> store and reads,
Is that also needed with vo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53436
--- Comment #6 from o.mangold at googlemail dot com 2012-05-22 08:32:03 UTC ---
Yes, I get, that it's not a good way to do things, as (among other reasons) a
volatile access is no memory fence. So accesses to other locations may not be
or
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498
Bug #: 53498
Summary: Compiler crashes during C++11 template magic
compilation
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53498
--- Comment #2 from o.mangold at googlemail dot com 2012-05-27 15:33:16 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> While the test code is somewhat broken,
Yes, I'm not surprised, this template stuff is a complete nightmare to me. As
you mention
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53506
Bug #: 53506
Summary: Variadic templates in combination with function
pointer problem
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53763
Bug #: 53763
Summary: Missing error check on decltype when used within
variadic template argument list
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status
