--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
07:50 ---
This program builds just fine:
$ cat conftest.c
main () {
/* Are we little or big endian? From HarbisonSteele. */
union
{
long l;
char c[sizeof (long)];
} u;
u.l = 1;
exit (u.c
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
09:35 ---
In the 64-bit case, again none of BYTE_ORDER, BIG_ENDIAN or LITTLE_ENDIAN are
defined. As far as I can understand, the configure script stops there and
doesn't run additional tests as in the 32-bit case
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
11:13 ---
This has to be the command line.
All I did was copying/pasting from the config.log file.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21782
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
11:39 ---
I tried anyway:
$ /export/Plocal/GCC-3.3.6/gcc/xgcc -B/export/Plocal/GCC-3.3.6/gcc/
-B/usr/local/gcc-3.3.6/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/bin/
-B/usr/local/gcc-3.3.6/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/lib/ -isystem
/usr/local
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
12:43 ---
We're heading in the wrong direction.
I don't see how '-v' can help. The problem is just that LD_LIBRARY_PATH contains
/usr/local/lib which contains a link to the 32-bit libgcc_s.so.1 library of gcc
4
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
12:44 ---
(In reply to comment #20)
$ env ldd conftest
Instead it should read:
env LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/export/Plocal/GCC-3.3.6/gcc/sparcv9 ldd conftest
I don't know what went wrong while copying/pasting
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-30
12:59 ---
See:
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libffi/Makefile.am#rev1.40
http://gcc.gnu.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/gcc/libffi/Makefile.in#rev1.51
These changes must somehow be related to my problems with gcc
: error: unknown endianess
Product: gcc
Version: 3.3.6
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: libffi
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-27
12:38 ---
Created an attachment (id=8979)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8979action=view)
complete build log, output of gmake bootstrap
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21782
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-27
12:40 ---
Created an attachment (id=8980)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8980action=view)
failing configure log: sparc-sun-solaris2.8/libffi/config.log
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-27
13:35 ---
1) I'm not sure this is a duplicate. The workstation I'm using is fully 64-bit
functional:
$ isainfo -v
64-bit sparcv9 applications
32-bit sparc applications
$
Both gcc
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-27
13:43 ---
Nothing has changed on my machine either except:
* I've upgraded the Sun assembler because of this:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2005-05/msg00509.html
I'm using GNU binutils for this build anyway, so
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-27
13:52 ---
The last version i had built in the gcc 3.3 series was 3.3.4. It had probably
been bootstrapped with gcc 3.3.3 and I was using GNU binutils 2.15 at that time.
Also maybe this is not related to changes
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-18
09:33 ---
I'm not sure what a DR is, probably a C++ standard defect report. After asking
on fr.comp.lang.c++ I was referred to Core Issue 278:
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#278
Whether
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-18
14:56 ---
I guess what I meant is: whatever the reason for this error message and whatever
the eventual decision taken about it, it would be nice to have an error message
that really means something to end-users
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-18
15:13 ---
OK, then what I really meant is that error message doesn't mean anything in
plain English, thus it doesn't mean anything to end-users. So it needs to be
improved. I understand it's not easy - after all
dot org
ReportedBy: papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
GCC target triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-11
14:21 ---
Whether the code is valid or not, please improve the error message :-)
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21514
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-11
14:38 ---
I think the first line could be made clearer:
'anonymous enum' is/uses anonymous type
I'm reading it again and again, and it doesn't make sense to me.
Then the second line refers to an operator most
: compiler does not emit error
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-10
17:53 ---
I don't understand.
If it is a problem, how does the standard not require to diagnostic?
At least the Stroustrup book is very clear about this. Anyway...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-05-10
18:02 ---
Ah OK. I was referring to the non-integral case (which apparently does need to
be diagnosed), not the integral case.
Anyway, this is indeed a duplicate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id
at shfj dot cea dot fr
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC host triplet: sparc-sun-solaris2.8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20401
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-03-10
09:48 ---
Created an attachment (id=8371)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8371action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20401
--- Additional Comments From papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr 2005-03-10
09:49 ---
Created an attachment (id=8372)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8372action=view)
stripped down test case
--
What|Removed |Added
Version: 3.4.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: preprocessor
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: papadopo at shfj dot cea dot fr
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
26 matches
Mail list logo
