https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111797
--- Comment #3 from Paul Floyd ---
With clang 17.0.2 (also tried 14.0) I get
:
0: 55 push %rbp
1: 41 57 push %r15
3: 41 56 push
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111797
--- Comment #2 from Paul Floyd ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> I think it's easiest to use a frame pointer when custom stack alignment is
> needed both for the return path and accessing arguments on the stack.
But is it faste
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: paulf at free dot fr
Target Milestone: ---
I was a bit surprised recently when I (unintentinally) ran perf record on the
exe that I work on with an -O3 build without -fno-omit-frame
--- Comment #2 from paulf at free dot fr 2008-11-15 20:51 ---
I do not agree that this is a duplicate of 6614. 6614 is a consequence of
integer promotion, and there is no possible user code change that would make it
go away (other than avoiding integral types smaller than int in
Summary: Excessive warnings when using -Wconversion and
char/bool/short function arguments
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: paulf at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38116
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: paulf at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38050
Product: gcc
Version: 4.0.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: paulf at free dot fr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38047
