http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01054.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00068.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57791
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01056.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00070.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01055.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00069.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01057.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00071.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg01058.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00072.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00930.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00931.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57787
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00941.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57782
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00963.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57780
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00970.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57790
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00880.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@ and fortran@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00798.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2013-07/msg00047.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00799.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #7 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patch@
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00800.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00661.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Patch sent to gcc-patches@:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-07/msg00662.html
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method gfc_match_call() in gcc/fortran/match.c, the loop on line 4189
should break immediately after i
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method resolve_variable() in gcc/fortran/resolve.c, the loop on line 4908
should break immediately
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method set_loop_bounds() in gcc/fortran/trans-array.c, the loop on line
4456 should break immediately
-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method gfc_build_dummy_array_decl() in gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c, the loop
on line 978
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method gfc_trans_transfer() in gcc/fortran/trans-io.c, the loop on line
2261 should break immediately
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method write_roots() in gcc/gengtype.c, the loop on line 4682 should break
immediately after skip_p
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method propagate_nothrow() in gcc/ipa-pure-const.c, the loop on line 1432
should break immediately
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method omega_eliminate_red() in gcc/omega.c, the loop on line 2592 should
break immediately after
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method validate_const_int() in gcc/read-rtl.c, the loop on line 804 should
break immediately
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method find_reloads() in gcc/reload.c, the loop on line 3324 should break
immediately after badop
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9.
In method computed_jump_p() in gcc/rtlanal.c, the loop on line 2801 should
break immediately after
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57800
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30433
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30433action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57801
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30434
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30434action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57802
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30435
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30435action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57803
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30436
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30436action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57804
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30437
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30437action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57805
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30438
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30438action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57806
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30439
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30439action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57810
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30440
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30440action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30441
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30441action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30442
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30442action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 3324
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57812
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30443
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30443action=edit
Suggested patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30444
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30444action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 3324
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57811
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30445
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30445action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4641
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #2 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30446
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30446action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 2594
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #3 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30447
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30447action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4856
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #4 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30448
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30448action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 4907
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57809
--- Comment #5 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
Created attachment 30449
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30449action=edit
Suggested patch for loop at line 5252
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30421
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30421action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in the revision 200588 in version
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30423
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30423action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30424
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30424action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30426
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30426action=edit
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30427
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30427action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57788
--- Comment #1 from Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu ---
(In reply to Po-Chun Chang from comment #0)
Created attachment 30427 [details]
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9. I have attached a
one-line
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30428
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30428action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588 in version 4.9
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30429
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30429action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
CC: nistor1 at illinois dot edu
Created attachment 30430
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30430action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in revision 200588
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu
Created attachment 30111
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30111action=edit
Suggested patch
The problem appears in version 4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57276
Po-Chun Chang pchang9 at cs dot wisc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|enhancement |normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57151
Bug #: 57151
Summary: Wasted work in method verify_cgraph_node
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
56 matches
Mail list logo