--- Comment #1 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2009-02-04 13:02
---
I can confirm this bug on my system.
[psi...@joana GCC]$ uname -a
Linux joana 2.6.27.12-170.2.5.fc10.i686 #1 SMP Wed Jan 21 02:09:37 EST 2009
i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
[psi...@joana GCC]$ g++ -v
Using built
lamarao at mndfck dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35147
--- Comment #1 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2007-07-10 01:33
---
Just to note I'm aware of the bug.
I'll take a look at it soon but unfortunately not too soon.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32676
--- Comment #14 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2007-04-12 23:12
---
This bug is not reproducible with current mainline.
I suspect it was closed years ago and should be closed by now.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2204
--- Comment #7 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2007-04-13 01:44
---
Created an attachment (id=13360)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13360action=view)
First attempt at fixing the bug.
This patch gives a diagnostic compiling the test case.
I just copied
--- Comment #5 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 11:37
---
Ah, just as I thought, but I was too sleepy to find about that function on my
own.
Must someone present this to gcc-patches or will you do it yourself?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
--- Comment #1 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:17
---
Created an attachment (id=12719)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12719action=view)
Reduced test case that provokes ICE.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
--- Comment #2 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:17
---
Created an attachment (id=12720)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12720action=view)
Stack trace taken at breakpoint in tree.c:2171
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30033
--- Comment #3 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2006-12-01 00:41
---
Created an attachment (id=12721)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12721action=view)
Reduced test case that provokes ICE.
--
pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org changed:
What
--- Comment #47 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-12-04 20:11
---
Any reason why libsupc++ can't include the stuff in config/ ?
I'm interested in seeing this bug go, I'd work on it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #32 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 12:26
---
Yes, I'll take a shot at this.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #33 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 13:26
---
Created an attachment (id=10307)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10307action=view)
Defines __cplusplus to 199711L and overrides it for solaris 8 *only*
Please see comment #33 before
--- Comment #34 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 13:29
---
I attached a patch containing Paolo's suggestions.
It was produced with svn diff -x -up after an svn copy like this:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] gcc] svn copy libstdc++-v3/config/os/solaris/solaris2.{7,8}
svn diff
--- Comment #37 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 15:11
---
Yes, please *heavily* comment.
If this is approved, someone could do the copy on the relevant branches, then
I'd send a patch with better comments and changelog to the gcc-patches list.
--
http
--- Comment #29 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 01:41
---
The following patch implements the suggested solution.
Is it correct?
I don't have access to any version of Solaris to check.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773
--- Comment #30 from pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org 2005-11-21 01:42
---
Created an attachment (id=10303)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=10303action=view)
Defines __cplusplus to 199711L and overrides it in c++config.h for solaris 8
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
2005-08-26 01:31 ---
Substituting the pragma for -fvisibility=hidden also seems to solve the problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22185
--- Additional Comments From pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
2005-06-26 14:58 ---
Works in the same system with a g++ 3.4.4 compiled from source:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Projetos]$ $HOME/.local/gcc-3.4.4/bin/g++ -O3 -fPIC -c -o
net_error.o net_error.ii
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Projetos]$ $HOME
lamarao at mndfck dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: i386-redhat-linux
GCC host triplet: i386-redhat-linux
GCC target triplet: i386-redhat-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22185
--- Additional Comments From pedro dot lamarao at mndfck dot org
2005-06-25 16:10 ---
Created an attachment (id=9149)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9149action=view)
Problem code
This file contains the declaration for a class inheriting from
std::runtime_error
21 matches
Mail list logo
