[Bug libstdc++/50349] New: /usr/bin/ld: warning: wildcard match appears in both version 'GLIBCXX_3.4' and 'CXXABI_1.3' in script

2011-09-10 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50349 Bug #: 50349 Summary: /usr/bin/ld: warning: wildcard match appears in both version 'GLIBCXX_3.4' and 'CXXABI_1.3' in script Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version:

[Bug target/49833] [x32] PIC doesn't work

2011-07-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49833 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net

[Bug debug/49407] unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions.

2011-06-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/49532] New: Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header (is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module D:\mingw.tests\l.dll]

2011-06-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532 Summary: Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header (is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module D:\mingw.tests\l.dll] Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1

[Bug debug/49532] Dwarf Error: wrong version in compilation unit header (is 1024, should be 2, 3, or 4) [in module D:\mingw.tests\l.dll]

2011-06-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49532 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-26 13:19:26 UTC --- testcase: http://pluto.agmk.net/mingw/tls-test.boost.tar.bz2

[Bug target/28854] unwinder reports sentinel frame.

2011-06-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28854 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #3 from

[Bug tree-optimization/24333] missed div optimizations

2011-06-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24333 --- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-22 21:56:27 UTC --- 4.6 still affected: f: movl%edi, %edx movl%edi, %eax sarl$31, %edx idivl %edi ret

[Bug tree-optimization/28850] missed call - jmp transformation; redundant unwind stuff with empty finally

2011-06-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28850 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.6.1 --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/30506] not sibcalling a function

2011-06-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30506 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug debug/49407] unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions.

2011-06-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-14 19:04:34 UTC --- Created attachment 24528 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24528 testcase

[Bug debug/49407] New: unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions.

2011-06-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49407 Summary: unusable debuginfo for dll-imported functions. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo:

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-06-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #17 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-06-05 11:43:45 UTC --- i've found the clue: pushing -gdwarf-4 through --enable-cxx-flags breaks the world.

[Bug c++/49290] New: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6795

2011-06-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49290 Summary: [C++0x] [4.6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/semantics.c:6795 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/49291] New: error: no matching function for call to std::liststd::tr1::shared_ptrB ::remove_if(A::release(B*)::F)

2011-06-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291 Summary: error: no matching function for call to std::liststd::tr1::shared_ptrB ::remove_if(A::release(B*)::F) Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/47942] Not possible to initialize a shared_ptr with a class defined in function scope, inheriting from a global scope base class

2011-06-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47942 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net

[Bug c++/49291] error: no matching function for call to std::liststd::tr1::shared_ptrB ::remove_if(A::release(B*)::F)

2011-06-05 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49291 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c++/47635] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

2011-05-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|4.5.3, 4.6.0|4.5.4, 4.6.1, 4.7.0

[Bug c++/47635] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

2011-05-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-05-26 18:49:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Is this a C++0x issue? Should be marked as such. yes, w/o c++0x i get: heshvpUtils.cpp:460:28: error: declaration of 'hvp

[Bug debug/49162] New: ICE in in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:10568 with -femit-struct-debug-reduced

2011-05-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49162 Summary: ICE in in output_die, at dwarf2out.c:10568 with -femit-struct-debug-reduced Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-03-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #16 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-03-22 20:03:09 UTC --- i've tested the latest 4.5 branch head. it produces less objdump errors but the core issue still exists. afaics the gdb-7.2 on win32 has problems with cfi_esacpes

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-03-18 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-02-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-02-12 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #23062|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug c++/47635] New: ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

2011-02-07 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 Summary: ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809 Product: gcc Version: 4.5.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47635] ICE on invalid code in constructor_name_p, at cp/name-lookup.c:1809

2011-02-07 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47635 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-02-07 16:53:27 UTC --- Created attachment 23266 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23266 testcase.

[Bug target/47619] New: ICE in printf() with -fsplit-stack enabled.

2011-02-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619 Summary: ICE in printf() with -fsplit-stack enabled. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo:

[Bug target/47619] ICE in printf() with -fsplit-stack enabled.

2011-02-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-02-06 10:17:05 UTC --- Created attachment 23254 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23254 testcase.

[Bug target/47619] ICE in printf() with -fsplit-stack enabled.

2011-02-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-gnu-linux

[Bug target/47619] ICE in printf() with -fsplit-stack enabled.

2011-02-06 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47619 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-28 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #27 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-28 22:05:01 UTC --- (In reply to comment #26) pluto at agmk dot net gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: with this patch the *current* gcc-trunk (with fixed PR47317) ICEs

[Bug inline-asm/47419] missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization?

2011-01-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47419 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-23 09:36:57 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) following code... unsigned __attribute__((regparm(2))) asm_read_mapped_register( unsigned* address, unsigned long index

[Bug inline-asm/47419] missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization?

2011-01-23 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47419 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-23 13:02:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Well there is no constraint for reg+reg*N really. You should do: asm /* reading has side-effects in hardware */ volatile

[Bug c++/47317] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47317 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-22 11:11:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) Seems to have been fixed already, perhaps by my patch for 46977. yes, pure gcc works now but the recent fix-candidate http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #25 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-22 11:14:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #24) A candidate fix was posted to http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-01/msg01381.html with this patch the *current* gcc-trunk

[Bug c++/47416] New: ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416 Summary: ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47416] ICE in build_data_member_initialization, at cp/semantics.c:5509

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47416 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-22 21:44:24 UTC --- Created attachment 23079 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23079 testcase

[Bug c++/47417] New: [4.6 Regression][C++0x] error: use of deleted function 'S::S(const S)'

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 Summary: [4.6 Regression][C++0x] error: use of deleted function 'S::S(const S)' Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c++/47417] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] error: use of deleted function 'S::S(const S)'

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 --- Comment #1 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-22 22:41:56 UTC --- Created attachment 23081 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23081 source testcase.

[Bug c++/47417] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] error: use of deleted function 'S::S(const S)'

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47417 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-22 22:42:26 UTC --- Created attachment 23082 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23082 preprocessed testcase.

[Bug inline-asm/47419] New: missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization?

2011-01-22 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47419 Summary: missed 'mov (base,index,scale),reg' optimization? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: inline-asm

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-21 12:23:04 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) Hmm, can't reproduce issue with current 4.6.0 gcc. Could you please retest with current version. It seems issue was already solved

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #7 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-21 13:37:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #6) I don't see an obvious difference to my toolchain (beside I use a cygwin cross-compiler). But such issues could be related also to used

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22975|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug c++/47398] [4.5/4.6 Regression] tree check: accessed elt 10 of tree_vec with 9 elts in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:10500

2011-01-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47398 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pluto at agmk dot net

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-21 18:41:50 UTC --- On Friday, January 21, 2011 04:32:23 pm you wrote: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Kai Tietz ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org changed

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-17 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #16 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-17 18:05:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #15) (In reply to comment #10) But it never checks the buffer end. It looks bogus to me. Read the comment at the beginning

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-17 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #18 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-17 19:37:54 UTC --- (In reply to comment #17) If there's some easy way we can add a valgrind exception for these functions to the gcc source tree, I'd be open to do so. But I

[Bug c++/47317] New: [4.6 Regression] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.

2011-01-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47317 Summary: [4.6 Regression] ICE in fixed_type_or_null. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/47317] [4.6 Regression][C++0x] ICE in fixed_type_or_null.

2011-01-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47317 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #22986|0 |1 is obsolete

[Bug debug/47308] New: Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Summary: Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe] Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktietz at gcc dot

[Bug c++/47311] New: [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 Summary: [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502 Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-15 23:16:13 UTC --- Created attachment 22976 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22976 preprocessed source.

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-15 23:18:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase: accidentally, the --save-temps (or -std=gnu++98) removes

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #5 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-15 23:20:41 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase: accidentally, the --save

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-15 23:27:22 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) (In reply to comment #2) (In reply to comment #1) (In reply to comment #0) current gcc-trunk (r168844) ICEs on my codebase

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #8 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-16 00:38:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #7) (In reply to comment #6) looks like valgrind problem with sse42 opcode: Disable SSE4 code to debug this. i've removed

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-16 01:05:20 UTC --- without SSE2 vectorized lexer: ==2012== Invalid read of size 8 ==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.c:263) ==2012==by 0xB434FE: _cpp_clean_line

[Bug debug/47308] Dwarf Error: Cannot find signatured DIE referenced from DIE at 0x2581 [in module D:\main64.exe]

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47308 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-16 01:09:21 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) without SSE2 vectorized lexer: ==2012== Invalid read of size 8 (...) ahhh, comment for wrong PR. please ignore.

[Bug c++/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #9 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-16 01:10:32 UTC --- without SSE2 vectorized lexer: ==2012== Invalid read of size 8 ==2012==at 0xB43064: search_line_acc_char (lex.c:263) ==2012==by 0xB434FE: _cpp_clean_line

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 --- Comment #12 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-16 01:36:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) (In reply to comment #9) without SSE2 vectorized lexer: ==2012== Invalid read of size 8 ==2012==at 0xB43064

[Bug preprocessor/47311] [C++0x] ICE in tsubst @cp/pt.c:10502

2011-01-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47311 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dodji at gcc dot

[Bug other/47276] New: ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 during compiling glibc.

2011-01-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47276 Summary: ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 during compiling glibc. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug tree-optimization/47276] [4.6 Regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 during compiling glibc.

2011-01-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47276 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-13 11:44:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22958 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22958 testcase.

[Bug tree-optimization/47276] [4.6 Regression] ICE in function_and_variable_visibility, at ipa.c:857 during compiling glibc.

2011-01-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47276 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2011-01-13 12:49:29 UTC --- git bisect identified this commit. [87ac7f211c08dba84adbd23b1013ef20aa3627f0] PR tree-optmization/46469

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

2010-12-07 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-12-07 22:05:15 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) With current mainline 20 elements finishes in 0.1s on my x86_64 system, which is only 5 times slower than non-debug mode. That's

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

2010-12-07 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/46659] New: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

2010-11-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 Summary: std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/46659] std::list iterator debugging (_GLIBCXX_DEBUG) is much slower than stlport's one.

2010-11-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46659 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-11-25 18:40:28 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Let's add Francois in CC, he knows STLPort pretty well. And somebody should profile this difference, redo the tests for current mainline

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-11-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work|| --- Comment #18

[Bug bootstrap/43328] multilib bootstrap broken.

2010-11-21 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43328 --- Comment #20 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-11-21 08:41:34 UTC --- (In reply to comment #19) (In reply to comment #18) what's the current status of the --{dis/en}able-multilib switches? As far as I know that of from before

[Bug bootstrap/46429] --enable-build-with-cxx fails on stddef.h

2010-11-20 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46429 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug ada/46574] New: ada bootstrap fails with --enable-build-with-cxx.

2010-11-20 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46574 Summary: ada bootstrap fails with --enable-build-with-cxx. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada AssignedTo:

[Bug plugins/46577] New: cp-tree.h: c-common.h/hard-reg-set.h needs to be installed into plugin directory.

2010-11-20 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46577 Summary: cp-tree.h: c-common.h/hard-reg-set.h needs to be installed into plugin directory. Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/46429] New: --enable-build-with-cxx fails on stddef.h

2010-11-11 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46429 Summary: --enable-build-with-cxx fails on stddef.h Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo:

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

2010-10-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-26 10:27:02 UTC --- (In reply to comment #3) I've backported the fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gccview=revrev=165658 Thanks for trying the printers and submitting bug

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

2010-10-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #6 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-26 11:29:58 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) that must be present on trunk too, right? this is a backport from, so probably trunk is affected too. if GDB can be built with python

[Bug plugins/41757] Add PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL

2010-10-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41757 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-15 20:11:57 UTC --- ping, ping. please, can we finally get this useful hook in 4.5/4.6?

[Bug libstdc++/45999] runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

2010-10-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 --- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-14 10:53:03 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) Reduced #include vector int main() { std::vectorbool b(4); b.push_back(1); return 0; } There's no pretty

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

2010-10-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690 --- Comment #3 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-14 11:13:10 UTC --- Created attachment 22036 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22036 my gcc build script.

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

2010-10-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690 --- Comment #4 from Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net 2010-10-14 11:17:55 UTC --- attached gcc build script builds libstdc++.a with dwarf3 debuginfo which works with testcase compiled with dwarf3 or dwarf4. if you change CUSTOM_FLAGS in build

[Bug libstdc++/45999] New: runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer.

2010-10-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45999 Summary: runtime error in std::vector python pretty printer. Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/46000] New: runtime error in std::set python pretty printer

2010-10-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46000 Summary: runtime error in std::set python pretty printer Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug bootstrap/25672] [4.3/4.4?/4.5 regression] cross build's libgcc picks up CFLAGS

2010-09-26 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25672 Pawel Sikora pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added Target|ppc64-pld-linux |x86_64-pc-mingw32

[Bug c++/45690] New: broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

2010-09-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

2010-09-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-16 14:01 --- Created an attachment (id=21811) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21811action=view) source, makefile and precompiled binaries. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45690

[Bug libstdc++/45403] python pretty printer for std::string requires GDB 7.1

2010-09-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #10 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-16 14:04 --- (In reply to comment #9) Are you sure you haven't modified your GCC sources? i'm testing gcc-4.5 from svn branch, with gdb-7.2 and binutils-2.20.51.0.11. filled as PR45690. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug c++/45690] broken debuginfo with dwarf4?

2010-09-16 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-16 21:02 --- ha, my gcc was built with: export CXXFLAGS=-O2; ./configure --disable-shared... and this CXXFLAGS afaics affects libstdc++.a debuginfo level. with CXXFLAGS=-O2 -g2 the python pretty printer works fine. testcase compiled

[Bug libstdc++/45403] python pretty printer for std::string requires GDB 7.1

2010-09-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #5 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-15 07:52 --- there's one more issue with std::string pretty printing. with -gdwarf-4 enabled it fails on gdb-7.2 with runtime error: $1 = Traceback (most recent call last): File /local/devel/toolchain45/x86_64-gnu-linux.mt_alloc/share

[Bug libstdc++/45403] python pretty printer for std::string requires GDB 7.1

2010-09-15 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #7 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-15 11:34 --- (In reply to comment #6) (In reply to comment #5) with -gdwarf-4 enabled it fails on gdb-7.2 with runtime error: I couldn't reproduce that with 4.5.2 20100909, can you give more details? $ cat t.cpp #include string

[Bug libstdc++/45403] python pretty printer for std::string requires GDB 7.1

2010-09-14 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-14 12:04 --- (In reply to comment #1) It's nothing to do with unordered_map, it's std::string, and it fails because lazy_string was added in GDB 7.1 we can probably do something like if (gdb.VERSION == '7.0

[Bug libstdc++/45537] New: [c++0x] reject valid? no matching function for call to 'make_pair(void*, int)'

2010-09-04 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http

[Bug other/45497] New: bogus warning at -O0 (control reaches end of non-void function).

2010-09-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45497

[Bug other/45497] bogus warning at -O0 (control reaches end of non-void function).

2010-09-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #1 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-02 11:38 --- Created an attachment (id=21659) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21659action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45497

[Bug middle-end/45497] [4.3/4.4/4.5/4.6 Regression] bogus warning at -O0 (control reaches end of non-void function).

2010-09-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #3 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-02 16:22 --- i thins this is really a duplicate of t2.cpp testcase from PR36254. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 36254 *** -- pluto at agmk dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/36254] [4.3 Regression] wrong control reaches end of non-void function warning with IF_STMT

2010-09-02 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #20 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-09-02 16:22 --- *** Bug 45497 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36254

[Bug target/39694] -print-file-name doesn't work on mingw in 100%.

2010-08-31 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
--- Comment #2 from pluto at agmk dot net 2010-08-31 13:45 --- no, it still doesn't work with 4.5.2 on linux hosted cross compiler. gcc finds libgcc_s pretty well during linking: % /local/devel/toolchain45/i686-pc-mingw32.host64.mt_alloc/bin/i686-pc-mingw32-gcc t.c -shared-libgcc -Wl

[Bug libstdc++/45403] New: broken python pretty printer for unordered_map.

2010-08-25 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45403

[Bug other/45278] New: -Wextra doesn't warn about (pointer 0 ).

2010-08-13 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45278

[Bug c++/45253] New: [c++0x] make_pair / cannot bind bitfield to unsigned.

2010-08-10 Thread pluto at agmk dot net
org ReportedBy: pluto at agmk dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC host triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux GCC target triplet: x86_64-gnu-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45253

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >