Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
While fixing PR60655 Jakub noted that the problem really was that var-tracking
and debug info generation can play a bit fast and loose in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #16 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Apr 10 08:13:30 2014
New Revision: 209269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR debug/60655 part 2.
2014-04-10 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #32564|0 |1
is obsolete|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 32564
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32564&action=edit
patch...
Fix so far tested just on the reduced and the full testcase. No issues. Now
bootstrapping and re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
I haven't had enough time to work on this one but in the interest of getting
this sorted for 4.9, I'm handling this as suggested by Jakub in the backend
under targetm.const_not_ok_for_debug_p and disal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60657
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Apr 7 13:17:11 2014
New Revision: 209185
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209185&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix testcase for PR target/60657
Modified:
trunk/gcc/testsuite
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #10 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Partially fixed on trunk - need to handle the failure without -fdata-sections
and -g
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #9 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Fri Apr 4 16:10:07 2014
New Revision: 209121
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=209121&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR debug/60655 - part 1
This is a partial fix for PR60655 whe
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60650
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Mar 31 14:21:58 2014
New Revision: 208961
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=208961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Adjust testcase for softfp cases.
PR target/60650
2014-03-31 Ram
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-03-27
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Summary|ICE [ARM] error: insn does |[ARM] ICE with asm (&quo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> As discussed yesterday with Ramana on IRC, my suggested fix for this for 4.9
> is something like:
> --- gcc/dwarf2out.c 2014-03-03 08:24:14.841895755 +010
|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ramana at gcc dot
gnu.org
||2014-03-25
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60653
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-03-25
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Command lines I was using to reproduce this with a cross compiler.
./cc1 -g -mthumb -fdata-sections -mfpu=vfpv3-d16 -mfloat-abi=hard -O2
-march=armv7-a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |debug
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
The expression being put out is :
(const:SI (not:SI (symbol_ref:SI ("*.LANCHOR0") [flags 0x182])))
#0 0x003105033410 in exit () from /lib64/libc.so.6
#1 0x011c56b8 in diagnostic_action_
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60655
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60609
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 32418
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32418&action=edit
Reduced testcase
Reduced testcase. Looks prima-facie like lengths are messed up somewhere which
needs care
||2014-03-21
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed - reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54051
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Rad
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37436
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37436
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45932
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2014-03-20
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
||2014-03-20
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Unfortunately there is no easy fix for this one without actually making a
source change to remove
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Mohamed Shafi from comment #2)
> So this is fixed in 4.7 then. Any plan to back port this?
No plans to backport any of the prolo
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-03-20
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mshawcroft at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Kugan from comment #2)
> Created attachment 32342 [details]
> Proposed RFC patch
>
>
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60459
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Raghu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > Can you try a newer version than GCC 4.2.1?
> >
> > Also can you provide the exact options you compiled your source
||2014-03-13
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed - Kyrill worked out that it was one of the MOVE_COSTS IIRC for this
purpose.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58424
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
||2014-03-11
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60106
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2014-03-10
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
4.2.1 is completely unsupported. There is not enough information here to try
and reproduce
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed as per Vlad's
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
For 4.9 we just ended up disabling the vec_perm support for AArch64 BE, thanks
to this patch - http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-01/msg00988
||2014-02-26
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
confirmed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60162
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 32120
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32120&action=edit
Reduced from gzip.
Command line options.
-march=armv7-a -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=hard -mthumb -O3 -mlra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60166
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
This is something that I've just noticed with spec2k gzip : longest_match.
If the function is compiled for a cros
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60109
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org,
||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org,
||yvan.roux at linaro dot org
Ever confirmed|0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60034
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Version|4.9.0 |4.8.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed now presumably.
-01-20 00:00:00 |2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59913 was something similar. Can
you see if it
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Confirmed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60030
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59904
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
looks like a dup of 60030
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 60030 ***
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed. I don't see these in any of my recent test results.
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-07
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
This looks like a case due
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Works for me on trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
St
||2014-02-06
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Looks to me like this is fixed. Trying
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2014-02-06
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
This is now fixed.
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Presumably fixed ?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59993
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #4)
> I am seeing the same with a cross compiler configured with
>
>
> $SRCDIR/configure --target=arm-none-linux-gnueabi --with-arch=armv7-a
> --with-fpu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59993
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57907
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana R
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59535
--- Comment #12 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #11)
> (In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
> > (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
>
> > I think major problem is in wrong alternat
||2013-12-19
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #11 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Vladimir Makarov from comment #9)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59091
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||2013-11-22
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
We'll look into fixing this for 4.9
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #8 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Mon Nov 11 09:38:14 2013
New Revision: 204665
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204665&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport fix for PR target/58854
2013-11-11 Ramana Radhakrishnan
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58934
--- Comment #6 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31121
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31121&action=edit
arm-none-eabi reduced testcase
./cc1 -O2 -g -mthumb -mcpu=cortex-a9 -mfpu=neon -mfloat-abi=softfp reduced.
,
|sparc-sun-solaris2.11 |sparc-sun-solaris2.11
|sh*-*-* |sh*-*-*,arm-none-eabi,arm-n
||one-linux-gnueabihf
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 from Ramana
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58595
--- Comment #1 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31116
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31116&action=edit
reduced testcase.
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-31
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.9.0
--- Comment #9 from Ramana
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-31
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-10-30
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.7.3, 4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.9.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.0
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed, presumably.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58847
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #7 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Wed Oct 30 10:54:04 2013
New Revision: 204203
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=204203&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR target/58854
2013-10-30 Ramana Radhakrishnan
PR targ
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #5 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Created attachment 31105
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31105&action=edit
lightly tested patch.
completely untested but appears to fix the problem - Ben, can you please try
this pa
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58854
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #3)
> Confirmed. The problem appears to show up with the use of mapcs on the
> command line. Mine.
sched2 moves this ahead - smells familiar.
Ramana
||2013-10-29
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||4.7.3
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.8.0, 4.8.1, 4.9.0
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Tue Oct 8 08:34:28 2013
New Revision: 203269
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=203269&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/58619
2013-10-08 Dehao Chen
* tree-inl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58619
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||arm-none-linux-gnueabi,
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Created attachment 30954
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30954&action=edit
pre-processed file from
||2013-08-28
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Known to fail||4.6.0, 4.7.0, 4.8.0
||2013-08-14
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.0
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
fixed for 4.8.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2013-08-08
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58065
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||4.7.0
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|ramana at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0
Known to fail||4.6.4
--- Comment #7
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48250
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Known to work||
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
--- Comment #4 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
4.3 is no longer interesting and this is
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58065
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
||2013-08-05
CC||ramana at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
On AArch64 with no strict alignment we end up generating with .002t.original
trunk
{
T tmp
701 - 800 of 1217 matches
Mail list logo
