http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #14 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-23
16:05:48 UTC ---
gcc 4.5.4 does not suffer from the problem compiling the attached repro code,
indicating this is a 4.6 regression.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #9 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-20
15:45:06 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
Note that, as I said already, I can't reproduce anywhere, not even in current
4_6-branch (on x86_64-linux -m32). Did you
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #7 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-19
17:24:14 UTC ---
So 4.6 branch is dead? Or no more i386 support?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
Bug #: 55355
Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at
tree.c:6415
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #1 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-16
17:23:11 UTC ---
Oops:
s/3.4.6/4.6.3/ on all above.
All references to gcc 3.4.6 should actually be gcc 4.6.3. I'm apparently
dyslexic or something today.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55355
--- Comment #3 from Richard Perrin rcp at sentientmeat dot ca 2012-11-16
17:50:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
I can't reproduce this on x86_64-linux, neither -m64 nor -m32. Tried 4.6.3,
current 4_6-branch, 4_7-branch and mainline
