[Bug rtl-optimization/56494] [4.8 Regression] ICE in simplify_truncation, at simplify-rtx.c:619

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56494 --- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2013-03-04 21:06:10 UTC --- jakub at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: Created attachment 29578 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug tree-optimization/46309] optimization a==3||a==1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46309 --- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-10-31 22:36:48 UTC --- eidletni at mail dot ru gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: Cool, thank you! +1, thanks Jakub

[Bug middle-end/54862] [4.8 Regression] error: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions in simplify-rtx.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54862 --- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-10-10 07:41:10 UTC --- Sorry for the breakage and thanks to Jakub for the fix. I agree UINTVAL is the right way to go FWIW.

[Bug rtl-optimization/54369] Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369 --- Comment #7 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 08:16:23 UTC --- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: Are you going to check this in on the mainline? Not without

[Bug rtl-optimization/54369] Delayed-branch pass in reorg.c removes too many instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54369 --- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-09-01 09:41:08 UTC --- ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: Looks good, thanks. Please go ahead. Thanks. On which branch(es

[Bug bootstrap/53249] [4.8 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53249 --- Comment #9 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 15:56:09 UTC --- hjl.tools at gmail dot com gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: get_address_mode in dwarf2out.c works for this testcase. Yeah

[Bug rtl-optimization/53176] [4.8 Regression] gcc.dg/lower-subreg-1.c FAILs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53176 --- Comment #19 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2012-05-06 19:17:03 UTC --- olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: --- Comment #18 from Oleg Endo olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org 2012-05

[Bug target/43804] [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands

--- Comment #13 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2010-05-03 09:53 --- Subject: Re: [4.5/4.6 regression] ICE in reload_cse_simplify_operands mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: --- Comment #10 from mkuvyrkov at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-04-23

[Bug driver/38864] Incorrect interaction between --with-arch=native and -mARCH

--- Comment #4 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2009-01-24 09:48 --- Subject: Re: Incorrect interaction between --with-arch=native and -mARCH nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org writes: --- Comment #3 from nemet at gcc dot gnu dot org 2009-01-24 02:47

[Bug target/28126] gcc moves an expensive instruction outside of a conditional

--- Comment #12 from rdsandiford at googlemail dot com 2008-09-08 19:48 --- Subject: Re: gcc moves an expensive instruction outside of a conditional daney at gcc dot gnu dot org [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Can we close this now? I think it is fixed. Sorry, this is still on the back