[Bug bootstrap/45680] [4.6 regression] cc1 fails to link on Solaris 9/x86 with Sun as: min_insn_size missing

2010-09-15 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #1 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-09-15 18:16 --- Subject: RE: New: [4.6 regression] cc1 fails to link on Solaris 9/x86 with Sun as: min_insn_size missing I will and let you know. Reza -Original Message- From: ro at gcc dot gnu dot org [mailto:gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/43065] [4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051215-1.c is miscompiled with -fgraphite-identity

2010-03-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #6 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-03-05 23:10 --- The main difference between the original test case and the reduced one is the type of test expression. I think in the fix you need to treat the address type similar to an unsigned integer. Reza -- http

[Bug tree-optimization/43065] [4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20051215-1.c is miscompiled with -fgraphite-identity

2010-03-04 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #3 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-03-04 18:37 --- I reduced the test to: -- extern void abort (void); __attribute__ ((noinline)) int foo (int *zzz, unsigned int kk) { int a, b, d; a = b = 0; for (d = 0; d 1000; d

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2010-02-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #3 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-02-05 21:10 --- The optimization performed is correct because: In C++ (not in C) a const modifier in a global variable has internal linkage (i.e. it is treated like a static variable) and therefore the optimization performed

[Bug target/30153] -fPIC failure

2010-02-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #4 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-02-05 23:11 --- (In reply to comment #3) The optimization performed is correct because: In C++ (not in C) a const modifier in a global variable has internal linkage (i.e. it is treated like a static variable) and therefore

[Bug tree-optimization/35501] Wrong value returned from const int

2010-02-05 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #5 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-02-05 23:14 --- The optimization performed is correct because: In C++ (not in C) a const modifier in a global variable has internal linkage (i.e. it is treated like a static variable) and therefore the optimization performed

[Bug other/38768] -fschedule-insns documentation is wrong for x86 and some other targets

2010-01-15 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #8 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-01-15 15:19 --- We used -O2 -fsched-pressure -fschedule-insns to build the cpu2006 bmks on an amd64-linux machine. Thanks for the list of bugs. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38768

[Bug other/38768] -fschedule-insns documentation is wrong for x86 and some other targets

2010-01-14 Thread reza dot yazdani at amd dot com
--- Comment #5 from reza dot yazdani at amd dot com 2010-01-14 22:12 --- Confirmed. Also note -fschedule-insns is basically broken for x86 anyways. Do you have a list of bug reports where -fschedule-insns is broken on x86? We tried to compile all the SPEC 2006 with this option