--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45562
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45564
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45354
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.5.2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45566
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 08:37 ---
I'll have a look.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45567
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |ada
Keywords||build
Target
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-07 08:37 ---
Hm, that expr shouldn't throw. I'll have a look.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45570
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 13:53 ---
Seems to be fixed by
2010-09-02 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/44937
PR tree-optimization/45412
* ipa-split.c (split_function): Properly remove PHI nodes.
*** This bug has been
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 13:53 ---
*** Bug 45557 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 12:15
---
Subject: Bug 45534
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Sep 6 12:14:02 2010
New Revision: 163913
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163913
Log:
2010-09-06 Richard Guenther
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-06 11:06
---
Ok, I reproduced a failure (but none of the kind reported here) and have a fix
for that issue. Maybe it fixes this bug too, which I still can't reproduce.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org ch
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 14:01 ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> > Please provide output of appending -v to the compiler command-line
>
> The configure options
> [macbook] gcc/p_build% gfcp -v
> Using built-in specs.
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 13:45 ---
That doesn't help me to reproduce the issue. Please provide output of
appending
-v to the compiler command-line (this must be reproducable on x86_64 with
appropriate flags).
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bug
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 13:43 ---
Nobody can say without a testcase. So please attach preprocessed source.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45541
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 11:43 ---
I can't see any of those on x86_64-linux, neither with -m32 nor with -m64.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 10:47 ---
Subject: Bug 45535
Author: rguenth
Date: Sun Sep 5 10:47:05 2010
New Revision: 163877
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163877
Log:
2010-09-05 Richard Guenther
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 10:47 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-05 08:57 ---
You probably ran out of memory and the kernel killed cc1plus.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45541
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 14:12 ---
I will have a look (seems I need to build a cross ...)
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45534
--- Comment #14 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 10:21
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 10:21
---
Subject: Bug 45519
Author: rguenth
Date: Sat Sep 4 10:21:07 2010
New Revision: 163858
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163858
Log:
2010-09-04 Richard Guenther
PR bootstr
--- Comment #12 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-04 09:34
---
Created an attachment (id=21693)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21693&action=view)
patch w/o typos...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45519
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 14:33 ---
Created an attachment (id=21683)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21683&action=view)
alternate fix
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45519
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 14:21 ---
Hmhm, IVOPTs expands crap into arguments.
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c (revision 163817)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 13:43 ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct { unsigned int p_vaddr; } Elf32_Phdr;
typedef struct { int d_tag; } Elf32_Dyn;
typedef unsigned _Unwind_Ptr __attribute__((__mode__(__pointer__)));
int
_Unwind_IteratePhdrCallback
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 13:27 ---
How does it fail?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 13:22 ---
Can you attach preprocessed source that allows reproducing on x86_64? Thx.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 12:55 ---
A fix will appear in the repositories beyond
http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/devel:/gcc/
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45502
--- Comment #15 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 11:32
---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:56 ---
Can't reproduce this. Can you re-check with a more recent version?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45512
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:51 ---
Fixed by rev. 163802.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #25 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:48
---
Subject: Bug 45496
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Sep 3 09:47:09 2010
New Revision: 163801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163801
Log:
2010-09-03 Richard Guenther
* l
--- Comment #24 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:47
---
Fixed for 4.5.2.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:39 ---
I can reproduce it with the SUSE release, it seems to be one of the backported
alias fixes that causes this (and it vanishes with -fno-strict-aliasing).
Works for all FSF releases I tried.
--
rguenth at gcc dot
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45505
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-03 09:28 ---
Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Comment #22 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 15:34
---
Fixed with http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=161935 on trunk.
Needs backporting. I'll do that. Can you verify this fixes your problem?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu do
--- Comment #21 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 15:23
---
Last guess in the wild is that libelf0 (from libelf) doesn't handle the
object file like it should and we somehow silently treat it as an empty one.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45496
--- Comment #19 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 15:00
---
The important difference is
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
.weak _ZN6holderIvE3varE
.section
.bss._ZN6holderIvE3varE,"awG",@nobits,_ZN6holderIvE3varE,comdat
.align 4
-
--- Comment #17 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 14:46
---
Created an attachment (id=21668)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21668&action=view)
working one
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45496
--- Comment #16 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 14:45
---
Created an attachment (id=21667)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21667&action=view)
working one
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45496
--- Comment #9 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:43 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:43 ---
Fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:42 ---
Subject: Bug 45412
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 2 13:42:25 2010
New Revision: 163775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163775
Log:
2010-09-02 Richard Guenther
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:42 ---
Subject: Bug 44937
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 2 13:42:25 2010
New Revision: 163775
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=163775
Log:
2010-09-02 Richard Guenther
PR tree-opti
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 13:08 ---
Confirmed. This is EH lowering.
:
finally_tmp.226 = 0;
std::auto_ptr::~auto_ptr (&msg);
switch (finally_tmp.226) , case 1: >
...
:
return;
:
return D.122655;
but the first return w/o v
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 12:56
---
It works for me on x86_64-linux-gnu.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45496
--- Comment #7 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 12:34 ---
And the first one. Mine.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 12:31 ---
This fixes the 2nd testcase for me:
Index: ipa-split.c
===
--- ipa-split.c (revision 163772)
+++ ipa-split.c (working copy)
@@ -993,8 +993,8
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:38 ---
It works for me with 4.5.0, 4.5.1 and current trunk.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45496
--- Comment #3 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:31 ---
Seems this is fixed.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45473
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45472
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking, ice-on-valid
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45444
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45422
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45415
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:24 ---
Maybe a similar issue, but this one is after DOM where we have stuff like
:
# .MEM_8 = PHI <.MEM_7(D)(2)>
# VUSE <.MEM_5>
j.0_12 = j;
goto ;
after jump-threading supposedly, so indeed a quite
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45388
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45386
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45301
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45220
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45219
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45199
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45186
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45172
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45122
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:11 ---
This is fixed now?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #10 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:09
---
Needs a status update.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45062
--- Comment #4 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 11:08 ---
I can't get anything but { dg-skip-if "" { *-*-* } { "-fwhopr" "-flto" } { "" }
} to work. But then -O0 still fails for me.
13 int i = 42;^M
$1 = 0^M
$2 = 42^M
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44972
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
GCC target triplet||hppa64-*-*
Priority|P3 |P1
http
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44964
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44937
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:51
---
The bogus types are not a regression.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44807
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44716
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu dot org
Priority|P3
--- Comment #8 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:47 ---
Can somebody ping the patch (or close this bug if it alread was applied)?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44150
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44031
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:46 ---
Please check whether
Index: gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c
===
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/torture/builtin-cproj-1.c (revision
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43957
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43937
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:41 ---
This looks like a genuine RTL alias problem, ipa-reference just causes x, y
and z to be marked as not aliased.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 10:36 ---
So this is, after all, an assembler bug and not a GCC bug?
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|FAIL: gcc.c-|[4.6 Regression] FAIL:
|torture/compile/pr45085.c
--- Comment #2 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 09:12 ---
It's just optimized to always print 10 and the maybe-uninitialized warning
code runs too late.
A dup of some other PR.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45493
--- Comment #13 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-02 09:07
---
(In reply to comment #11)
> (In reply to comment #10)
> > typedef my_unaligned_aliasing_uint32 uint32
> > __attribute__((aligned(1),may_alias));
> >
> > inline __attribute__(
--- Comment #6 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 13:40 ---
I am sure this is more a pthread implementation issue, so a glibc bug
on sourceware.org/bugzilla would be more appropriate.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45479
--- Comment #1 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 13:33 ---
Confirmed. Obviously Honzas.
--
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
--- Comment #5 from rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2010-09-01 10:19 ---
I see before SLP:
:
MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D)].a = 0;
MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D)].b = 0;
MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D)].c = 0;
[LP 2] MEM[(struct A *)this_1(D) + 12B].a = 0;
and after:
:
vect_cst_.1_16 = { 0
201 - 300 of 15085 matches
Mail list logo
