[Bug other/108464] [13 Regression] Broken -fdebug-prefix-map since r13-3599

2023-01-19 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464 --- Comment #5 from Richard Purdie --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Though, even for the other options the change doesn't seem to be a good idea > as is. > I think instead the syntax of those remapping options should be

[Bug other/108464] [13 Regression] Broken -fdebug-prefix-map since r13-3599

2023-01-19 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464 --- Comment #3 from Richard Purdie --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2) > Dunno about other uses of remap_filename, but for remap_debug_filename what > that commit changed doesn't seem to be ever appropriate. I think it depends on

[Bug other/108464] [13 Regression] Broken -fdebug-prefix-map since r13-3599

2023-01-19 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108464 --- Comment #1 from Richard Purdie --- I can see why that would change behaviour with the patch :(. It is a tough dilemma since without the patch, files might have prefixes removed some of the time but not all the time, depending on whether

[Bug c++/47256] "--sysroot" option is not passed to COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS

2021-11-25 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47256 --- Comment #7 from Richard Purdie --- Thanks for the tip, we'll look into dropping it!

[Bug other/55930] [7/8/9/10 Regression] libatomic build failure if configured with --disable-dependency-tracking

2019-07-10 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930 --- Comment #12 from Richard Purdie --- I started to look at sorting out Yocto Project/Openembedded's gcc patches in general and ran into a contribution agreement legal quagmire. I still haven't been able to resolve that.

[Bug other/55930] [7/8/9 Regression] libatomic build failure if configured with --disable-dependency-tracking

2019-04-02 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930 --- Comment #9 from Richard Purdie --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #8) > (In reply to Richard Purdie from comment #6) > > Its part of a Yocto Project build and we would only ever build it once so we > > don't need/want the

[Bug other/55930] libatomic build failure if configured with --disable-dependency-tracking

2019-04-01 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55930 Richard Purdie changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.purdie@linuxfoundat

[Bug bootstrap/7125] libz is built even if configured with --with-system-zlib

2012-02-06 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7125 Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC

[Bug bootstrap/7125] libz is built even if configured with --with-system-zlib

2012-02-06 Thread richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7125 --- Comment #11 from Richard Purdie richard.purdie at linuxfoundation dot org 2012-02-06 16:23:16 UTC --- Sorry, my previous report should be disregarded as it was user error. The option does appear to work for me, removing the zlib compile where