https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #16 from Rin Okuyama ---
The fix has been cherry-picked for NetBSD:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/07/18/msg146078.html
Let me thank you again, Oleg!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #10 from Rin Okuyama ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #9)
> Sorry for being late for 2 years with this.
...
> Unfortunately GCC 10.5 has just been released recently and that was the last
> version 10.
> So the patch will be i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #8 from Rin Okuyama ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #7)
Hi Oleg. Thank you very much for your great work!
I've tested your patch with GCC 10.4.0 in this weekend, and it perfectly
worked:
- testcase attached to comment #0 co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100107
Rin Okuyama changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #6 from Rin Okuyama ---
(In reply to Rin Okuyama from comment #3)
> If that peephole is removed, GCC 10.3 generates working codes.
>
> NetBSD/shle built by this compiler works fine as far as I can see.
> I'm carrying out full regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #5 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you for your kind attention! I look forward to hearing from you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #3 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you very much for your analysis!
If that peephole is removed, GCC 10.3 generates working codes.
NetBSD/shle built by this compiler works fine as far as I can see.
I'm carrying out full regression tests
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #1 from Rin Okuyama ---
I've confirmed that the problem also occurs for sh3-none-elf:
$ sh3-none-elf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/pkg/cross-sh3-none-elf/bin/sh3-none-elf-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/pkg/cross-s
mponent: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rin at NetBSD dot org
CC: rin at NetBSD dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: shle--netbsdelf
This Bug is for GCC 10.3 for shle:
$ shle--netbsdelf-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #11 from Rin Okuyama ---
Segher, let me thank you again!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #7 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you for discussion. The proposed patch works fine for me (except for
missing ``;'' at the end of the line).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100108
--- Comment #2 from Rin Okuyama ---
e500mc also supports isel. See its reference manual (Sec. 3.4.5.3):
https://www.nxp.com/docs/en/reference-manual/E500MCRM.pdf
or source code of binutils/gas:
https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a
: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rin at NetBSD dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50609
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50609&action=edit
Fix for this regression
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rin at NetBSD dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50608
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50608&action=edit
Fix f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216
--- Comment #11 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you for your response, and sorry for the late reply.
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #10)
> > > That might or might not work; the user had better know what he is
> > > doing if he uses an a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216
--- Comment #9 from Rin Okuyama ---
Hi Segher,
Thank you for your kind reply. I committed your fix to NetBSD's local
tree of GCC 5.4.
> > However, I have a question on this fix. How about the case where
> > "-Wa,-mXXX" option is given without "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216
--- Comment #7 from Rin Okuyama ---
I'm the submitter of Bug 78764. I confirmed that my problem has been
resolved on gcc-5-branch. Let me thank you again for fixing it.
However, I have a question on this fix. How about the case where
"-Wa,-mXXX"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78764
--- Comment #3 from Rin Okuyama ---
Thank you very much for your notification. I overlooked both fix and PR 71216.
I'm so sorry for bothering you.
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: rin at NetBSD dot org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 40300
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40300&action=edit
restrict usage of ".machine" pseudo-op to 64-bit powerpc
GC
19 matches
Mail list logo
