[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-10-17 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #10 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-10-17 22:42 --- This is still a problem with: gcc (GCC) 4.1.1 20060525 (Red Hat 4.1.1-1) Additionally, link times are much longer than with 3.4.6 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27140

[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-21 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #9 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-04-21 23:12 --- Andrew Pinskia wanted me to mention that there are other source files in LLVM that exhibit the slow down. The one I attached is the worst offender, but there are others. Unfortunately, I don't remember which files and I

[Bug c++/27140] New: Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-13 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
with 4.0 Product: gcc Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rspencer at x10sys dot com GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-13 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #1 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-04-13 07:48 --- Created an attachment (id=11253) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11253action=view) source code and -ftime-report output for both 4.0.2 and 4.1.0 This tarball contains 2MB of pre-compiled source code

[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-13 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #4 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-04-13 17:26 --- Re: 2 million lines: Yes, my apologies for the late night blunder. It is 2,231,753 bytes and 79,037 lines. Re: large switch statements: There are several switch statements, none of them large. The largest is about 200

[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-13 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #5 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-04-13 20:13 --- Created an attachment (id=11260) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11260action=view) Timing results when using GCC 4.1.1 This attachment provides the -ftime-report output for the same compilation

[Bug tree-optimization/27140] Compiling LLVM now takes nearly 5x as long with 4.1 as it did with 4.0

2006-04-13 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Comment #6 from rspencer at x10sys dot com 2006-04-13 20:30 --- Created an attachment (id=11261) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11261action=view) Timing results with -fno-tree-salias Andrew Pinskia suggested that I try -fno-tree-salias. This decreased

[Bug c++/22121] New: Suspicious may be used uninitialized warning.

2005-06-19 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rspencer at x10sys dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: i686-pc-linux-gnu

[Bug c++/22121] Suspicious may be used uninitialized warning.

2005-06-19 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-06-19 15:57 --- Created an attachment (id=9112) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9112action=view) Pre-processed compiler input This file contains the pre-processed input to the compiler from a source file

[Bug libgcj/21326] seg fault in _Jv_Linker

2005-05-04 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-05-04 16:55 --- One other note. Shouldn't the segfault in _Jv_Linker be fixed anyway? Dereferencing a point of value 0x01 isn't likely to be valid in any circumstances? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21326

[Bug libgcj/21326] seg fault in _Jv_Linker

2005-05-04 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-05-04 19:48 --- Okay, after fixing some makefile bugs, the workaround suggested by Tom worked. Feel free to close this now unless you want to track down the SIGSEGV. Reid -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id

[Bug libgcj/21326] seg fault in _Jv_Linker

2005-05-03 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
--- Additional Comments From rspencer at x10sys dot com 2005-05-03 22:16 --- I don't see how that is possible on the application side as the source code is 100% Java and it is all compiled with the same options (there's only one compilation command that compiles all sources). Perhaps

[Bug libgcj/21326] New: _Jv_Linker

2005-05-01 Thread rspencer at x10sys dot com
Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: libgcj AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: rspencer at x10sys dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org,java-prs at gcc dot gnu dot org