--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-17 00:59
---
C++ test cases fixed. Reopen after Ada is stable if it still fails there.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-16 18:22
---
Andrew, your C++ test case doesn't reproduce for me. I'm attempting to see
if Ada is now in a buildable state...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22022
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-16 18:16
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 20:02
---
Well then you're going to have to tell me what local changes you have such
that you can build gnatlib. Or wait until someone bothers to check in
changes such that it Just Works.
--
http://gcc.gn
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-13 06:16
---
Fixed in C++ for sure; I don't seem to be able to build Ada at the moment.
--
What|Removed |
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-09 08:14
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-08 19:38
---
Fixed here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-06/msg00809.html
--
What|Removed |Added
t org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: ctice at apple dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21956
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-08 00:08
---
This patch trivially "fixes" the problem because the argument to
legitimate_pic_address_disp_p is incorrect, and it will always
return false.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20928
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-07 23:49
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-06-04 19:28
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
CONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P2
Component: target
AssignedTo: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: alpha-linux
htt
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-25 23:25
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
URL
--
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21692
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 09:56
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 09:44
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
Bug 21412 depends on bug 21657, which changed state.
Bug 21657 Summary: [4.0 regression] TLS reference miscompiled
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21657
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 06:31
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 04:23
---
Part 1 of a fix: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-05/msg01947.html
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21541
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-19 01:58
---
The root cause of this has nothing to do with the type system per-se.
The original program skirts the line of legality, and get_expr_operands
is falling over.
--
What|Removed
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 22:49
---
Ug. Missed deleting a line from local-dynamic side.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 18:06
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 17:42
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 17:15
---
We don't assign TImode to this structure, because we assume TImode needs
128-bit alignment, and this structure has 64-bit alignment. Which means
that the structure gets BLKmode. All BLKmode parameter
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 16:45
---
The test case in #10 is not a tls address; it is a dup of PR21632.
--
What|Removed |Added
GCC
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 08:21
---
Not alpha specific. The tunings we have in the alpha memcpy expansion are
correct for real copies between memory. We want to prefer
ldbu $1,3($17)
ldbu $2,0($17)
ldbu $3,1($17
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:09
---
Do you still reproduce this? I suppose I've not bootstrapped with anything
other than alphaev67 in a while, so this might be an ev4 bug...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21323
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:04
---
*** Bug 20089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 06:04
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 18434 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-18 05:57
---
This happens on Linux as well.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 23:16
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 18:26
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 18:14
---
True. I remember trying this, though, and in practice all it did was increase
register pressure.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21588
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #8898|z |proposed patch
description||
Attachment #8898|z
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-16 03:23
---
Not a duplicate entirely.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED
Priority: P2
Component: tree-optimization
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: amacleod at redhat dot com,gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot
org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21596
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-13 19:43
---
Well, since it works on ia64-linux, you'll have to give me more information.
I assume I'm failing to addp4 in the right place, or something...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21556
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-12 17:56
---
ia64 fixed; sparc still broken. But I'm not planning to work on that.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-11 07:35
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-10 19:10
---
This affects 4.0 as well, and it prevents ia64 bootstrap.
--
What|Removed |Added
iority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: ia64-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21502
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09 13:46
---
Powerpc fixed; ia64 still broken.
--
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[PowerPC] ICE
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-09 13:44
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-08 18:26
---
It's the unwind info that should be changed, not the code.
I'll do it.
--
What|Removed
PP
sc
#NO_APP
nop
nop
nop
nop
blr
I thought perhaps they were alignment, but they don't align, and they show
up with -Os.
--
Summary: Hordes of nop instructions being emitted
Product: gcc
Version: 4.1.0
Sta
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-07 00:54
---
Testing fixes.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-06 08:04
---
ia64.c has a similar bug in ia64_expand_load_address.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21412
org
ReportedBy: rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc*-linux
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21412
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-04 01:39
---
Fixed, I assume. Reopen if not.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-05-01 22:56
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-30 00:21
---
We will not be setting __NO_MATH_INLINES for any reason. Work with glibc to get
the inlines disabled at the source under the correct conditions.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-29 02:03
---
(In reply to comment #9)
> I guess the right fix is to use adjust_address rather than plus_constant.
Please try
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02820.html
with the additional assignment
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 22:20
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 22:10
---
Not target specific.
--
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |rtl
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-24 08:17
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 19:18
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:57
---
Technically this is generic, though one does have to have vector support in the
target for things to make it this far to see.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 18:55
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:23
---
Confirmed.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:21
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 17:16
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-23 16:56
---
Confirmed. Curiously, the test case doesn't fail compiled as C, only C++.
--
What|Removed |
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-20 20:18
---
Doesn't fail on i686-linux.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21126
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-20 06:55
---
*** Bug 21095 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21069
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-20 06:55
---
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 21069 ***
--
What|Removed |Added
--
Bug 21095 depends on bug 21069, which changed state.
Bug 21069 Summary: [4.1 Regression] gcc.dg/ia64-sync-*.c execution tests fail
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21069
What|Old Value |New Value
---
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-20 06:55
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg02168.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 19:34
---
No, because __sync_bool_compare_and_swap is overloaded.
This expansion to __sync_bool_compare_and_swap_N is documented.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-19 16:21
---
When, exactly, did you think that cmpxchg was added? Use -march=i486. Duh.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:39
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:31
---
Subject: Re: too liberal operator lookup
Why are you pinging bugzilla, and not the list, wherein a c++
maintainer might see it?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17805
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-17 06:29
---
patch: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-04/msg01881.html
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-16 23:20
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-16 02:08
---
Middle-end bits are done. Target maintainers need to update md files
for new patterns, but i686 and ia64 are done.
--
What|Removed |Added
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|nathan at gcc dot gnu dot |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|org |
Status|REOPENED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 23:44
---
Nathan, this patch is causing problems on Alpha.
In particular, we now run assign_parms_setup_varargs before processing the
last named argument (union U in this test case). Which yields an abort in
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-09 03:09
---
I'm working on atomic builtins, but this will *not* resolve the problem of
compiling for i386 and i486+. Indeed, it could easily make it worse because
you won't have the kind of control you did
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-07 17:52
---
For the record, this has come up on the lists before in some slightly other
context and Mark has advocated (1). I'm of a mind to agree.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20794
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-05 23:03
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-05 23:02
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-01 01:17
---
Fine.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rth at gcc dot gnu dot org
|dot org |
Status|NEW
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-04-01 00:00
---
It's marked as a 4.0 regression. Do you plan on applying the patch there?
If not, we should simply close the bug.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20331
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 23:21
---
Is this fixed now that a patch has been applied?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20331
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 23:05
---
The 2009-1.c failure has been fixed by Joern by taking the USER_LABEL_PREFIX
into account.
I can't replicate the reported mmix double output failure with 20040323-1.c;
I can only presume that it&#
--- Additional Comments From rth at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-31 22:18
---
Apparently fixed in the original source.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
501 - 600 of 974 matches
Mail list logo
