Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc version:
gcc version 10.0.1 20200329 (experimental) (GCC)
ICEs on the following (invalid) input:
-- x.cc
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
With this version of gcc10 (svn rev 279832):
gcc version 10.0.0 20200102 (experimental) (GCC)
This source does not compile:
-- x.cc
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
With this version of gcc10 (svn rev 279832):
gcc version 10.0.0 20200102 (experimental) (GCC)
this source gives an ICE when compiled with -O:
-- x.cc
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc9 rejects the following code:
-
template class Base {};
class Block
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc 20181205 gets an ICE compiling this code. (8.2.1 compiles it without
error.)
thanks,
sss
--
template
struct xtest
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
With gcc checked out on 2018-07-01 from gcc-8-branch (rev 262277,
tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu [fedora 28]), this input:
-- y.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61037
scott snyder <s...@li-snyder.org> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RE
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
With gcc version
gcc version 8.0.1 20180115 (experimental) (GCC)
compiling this source with -Wextra -std=c++17 gets a warning:
-- x.cc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
As of
gcc version 8.0.0 20180102 (experimental) (GCC)
gcc gives an unused-but-set warning for variables that are used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79091
--- Comment #7 from scott snyder <s...@li-snyder.org> ---
Confirmed that this fixes the original problem from which the test case
was derived. Thanks!
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc version 7.0.0 20170119 gives what appears to be a spurious warning
for this example when compiling with -O3 (tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc version 7.0.0 20170111 gives what appears to be a spurious warning
for this example when compiling with -O3 (tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
hi -
gcc version 7.0.0 20170111 gives an ICE for this example
(tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu):
enum {
ColMajor = 0
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
hi -
This bug may be related to 78495.
gcc version 7.0.0 20170111 generates bad code for this example
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 36438
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36438=edit
test case
hi -
I'm testing gcc from the gcc-5-branch
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: s...@li-snyder.org
hi -
I'm using gcc from the 4.9 branch:
GNU C++ (GCC) version 4.9.1 20140502 (prerelease) (x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
compiled by GNU C version 4.9.1 20140502 (prerelease), GMP version 5.1.2,
MPFR version 3.1.2, MPC
16 matches
Mail list logo
