[Bug c++/86135] At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize with pa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135 --- Comment #12 from Sabetay Toros --- Created attachment 44272 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44272=edit Testi case for crashed initialiazer list

[Bug c++/86135] At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize with pa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135 --- Comment #11 from Sabetay Toros --- Here is my test case. The issue is in line 30. Please change the line commented with direct initilization. It wont crash. If you are right list initializers is not usable. I hope you have an answer.

[Bug c++/86135] At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize with pa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135 --- Comment #9 from Sabetay Toros --- I´ve examined your link. This is not the same case as you are stating. I am not initializing a vector with an initializer list, rather I am trying to initialize only one object member with a universal

[Bug c++/86135] At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize with pa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135 --- Comment #6 from Sabetay Toros --- Hi, *Because the rules for direct-initialization (with parentheses) andlist-initialization (with braces) are different. Different rules meansdifferent things happen. * the rules may be different but

[Bug c++/86135] At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize with pa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86135 --- Comment #4 from Sabetay Toros --- *​" --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely http://gnu.org/>> ---This is not a bug, GCC is correct. With list-initialization the compiler doesnot always select a copy/move constructor even when the argument is

[Bug c++/86135] New: At run time, when the constructor tries to construct an objects element with a initializer-list (using c++11 style) is giving segmentation fault. The old style of initialize wi

Reporter: sabetaytoros at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Operating System Windows 8. Compiler On internet wandbox.org gcc HEAD 9.0 2018O6 $ g++ prog.cc -Wall -Wextra -I/opt/wandbox/boost-1.67.0/gcc-head/include -std=gnu++2a Issue : Initializing an element with angel brackets does