[Bug fortran/61073] New: -fcheck='do' leads to twice the amount of GDB steps in a do loop

Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com I am not sure if this is a bug or the way it is supposed to work, but I could not find anything relative online. I have written the following code

[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #13 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Did you update the compiler name in your makefile? I have left the line COMPILER=gfortran at the top as it is and I have defined an alias in my ~/.bashrc for gfortran

[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #15 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Did you install the compiler (i.e. run 'make install')? Yes, I did. I read http://gcc.gnu.org/install/index.html and made a summary of the steps I followed (attached

[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #8 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 32430 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32430action=edit Compilation logs and installation workflow

[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #9 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Thank you for the fast response and effort. I have installed gcc from svn but the results are still the same. Perhaps I mis-installed something? Attached you will find

[Bug fortran/60543] [4.7/4.8/4.9 Regression] Function with side effect removed by the optimizer.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60543 --- Comment #11 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Yes, I did; I used make clean first (also rm *.o *.f90 *.s in the main folder to clean up the files generated by -save-temps).

[Bug fortran/60543] New: Random number problems with REAL64 precision at different optimization levels

: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com Created attachment 32365 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=32365action=edit code and compiled files The attached code

[Bug fortran/59525] New: Inheritance problems

: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com I have some problems with inheritance. In particular, I can not allocate an allocatable class variable to a child type (the extra components are not recognized by the compiler). Attached is a minimal working

[Bug fortran/59525] Inheritance problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59525 --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31446 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31446action=edit Minimal working example

[Bug fortran/59168] New: Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com I wanted to check the difference in CPU time in the calculation of a sum when the terms are included in the same expression and when they are added separately. For this reason I wrote

[Bug fortran/59168] Wrong result with non-optimized (!) compilation

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59168 --- Comment #1 from Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 31234 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31234action=edit Bug code

[Bug fortran/58852] ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58852 Sarantis Pantazis sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/58852] New: ASSOCIATE returns nothing after changing the value

: fortran Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: sarantis.pantazis at gmail dot com Created attachment 31081 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=31081action=edit Minimal working example for associate bug (?) Hello. I was not able to find anything