AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38856
--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-01-15 21:03 ---
Andrew, thank you for the prompt reply.
I have seen PR 31849 and used the patch suggested. Without it autoincrement
would not work at all for either case. But the patch seems to deal with the
case when iv _were_
piler error: in check_cfg, at haifa-sched.c,
var-tracking
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy
--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-02-25 17:00 ---
Thank you for the suggestion, but...
I use schedule_ebbs in machine dependent reorg, and I do call
compute_bb_for_insn before it. CFG is messed up before I get there...
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
ity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
--- Comment #3 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-29 18:02 ---
Thanks for prompt response...
This is an unsupported target, so I guess i will have to narrow it down a bit.
Any suggestions on where to start?
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39967
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39982
--- Comment #5 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-04-30 19:32 ---
Please close this issue. I think the real problem is in libc, not in the
compiler. (test passes with -fno-threadsafe-statics). Thank you for support.
--
sergei_lus at yahoo dot com changed:
What
s stores related to
tree-loop-im
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #3 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-05-20 21:23 ---
Yes. This is the problem. Thank you very much.
--
sergei_lus at yahoo dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40223
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40224
t org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40225
--- Comment #1 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-05-22 15:08 ---
Created an attachment (id=17901)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=17901&action=view)
c++ file
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40225
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40259
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40262
ponent: middle-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42794
le-end
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41072
--- Comment #2 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-08-17 16:35 ---
First of all, I agree that a union would work better for type-punning, but...
With all the respect I am not convinced that this is the case here. Even if I
do something like this:
tmp_ch = (char *)&ans;
tm
Summary: unnamed bitfield declaration parser regression
Product: gcc
Version: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at
n: 4.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: sergei_lus at yahoo dot com
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41131
--- Comment #9 from sergei_lus at yahoo dot com 2009-08-21 18:17 ---
This patch works for me. Thanks.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41131
22 matches
Mail list logo