[Bug libstdc++/19664] libstdc++ headers should have pop/push of the visibility around the declarations

2007-05-28 Thread simon dot strandman at telia dot com
--- Comment #107 from simon dot strandman at telia dot com 2007-05-28 11:49 --- (In reply to comment #106) > I haven't tried the fix in 20218. surprisingly, moving to binutils > 2.17.50.0.16.20070511 got rid of that problem. Do you know what exactly is > going on? how

[Bug middle-end/20297] #pragma GCC visibility isn't properly handled for builtin functions

2005-10-18 Thread simon dot strandman at telia dot com
--- Comment #11 from simon dot strandman at telia dot com 2005-10-18 12:21 --- I'm using gcc 4.0.2 with patches for gcc pr19664, pr20297 and pr19520. The testcase from this bug passes without problems. Still firefox beta2 and current CVS fails to build. I talked to the mozilla guy

[Bug target/19520] protected function pointer doesn't work right

2005-11-06 Thread simon dot strandman at telia dot com
--- Comment #21 from simon dot strandman at telia dot com 2005-11-06 09:50 --- (In reply to comment #18) > I posted an updated patch > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-02/msg00196.html > > I hope it will work better. Sorry to bother but where is the updated p

[Bug c++/19664] -fvisibility-inlines-hidden fails with gcc's extern template extension on amd64

2005-01-28 Thread simon dot strandman at telia dot com
--- Additional Comments From simon dot strandman at telia dot com 2005-01-28 13:35 --- >Thanks for the nice testcase. Is this really a GCC bug, or a binutils bug: > >http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79711 Downgrading binutils from 2.15.92.0.2 to 2.15.90.0.1.1