: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sonoro at telefonica dot net
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 37699
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37699&action=edit
ii file and command line response rar compressed
Hi,
I have got internal compiler erro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69832
--- Comment #2 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #1)
> I can't reproduce the ICE with -std=c++11 -fpermissive on x86_64-linux.
I am on 32 bits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69832
--- Comment #4 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> I see, but I still can't reproduce even with -m32.
I have added -fpermissive but nothing changes for me.
May be its no gcc issue but on
P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: sonoro at telefonica dot net
I get this with mingw32-4.8.1-posix-sjlj but not with
mingw32-4.8.1-posix-dwarf
C:\SupercolliderRepos\master4\supercollider\server\plugins\DelayUGens.cpp:
In function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #3 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
Created attachment 30808
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=30808&action=edit
ii file compressed with rar
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #4 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
this are the compiler flags for the project
CXX_FLAGS = -save-temps -msse -msse -mfpmath=sse -msse2 -std=c++11
-mstackrealign -O2 -g -DNDEBUG
@CMakeFiles/DelayUGens_supernova.dir
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #5 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
Is there anything else I must provide in order to solve this issue?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #6 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #1)
> In any case a self contained reproducer is a requirement. Please do your
> best to reduce it to a manageable size
>
> http://gcc.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58372
--- Comment #11 from sonoro at telefonica dot net ---
So it seems you solved the problem in sjlj
Are you going to push it?
Thanks
victor