: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: spop at gcc dot gnu.org
void bar(int i) {
char A[10];
int d = 0;
while (i > 0)
A[d++] = i--;
while (d > 0)
foo(A[d--]);
}
Compile this function at -O3 with the last good revision r213487 and with the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54742
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #37
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #29 from Sebastian Pop ---
(In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #28)
> delinearize the array accesses, and we don't have code to do that yet.
There is code to delinearize array accesses in LLVM now: it works on top of
SCEV, so it s
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #28 from Sebastian Pop ---
(In reply to Evgeniy Dushistov from comment #26)
> void mult(const double * const __restrict__ A, const double * const
> __restrict__ B, double * const __restrict__ C, const size_t N)
> {
> for (size_t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #25 from Sebastian Pop ---
I think the linearization of array subscripts problem is linked to passing
arguments to a function in Fortran: by inlining the mult function call in the
main program, the main loop on C(I,J)=C(I,J)+A(I,K)*B(K
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #24 from Sebastian Pop ---
Looking at t.f90.003t.original (the first dump file of -fdump-tree-all-all)
I see that the array c is already in linear form:
(*cD.1876)[((integer(kind=8)D.9) jD.1897 * stride.12D.1892 + offset.13D.1893) +
(
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #23 from Sebastian Pop ---
If possible, we need to maintain the subscripted version of arrays:
C(I,J)
A(I,K)
B(K,J)
Without a representation of multi dimensional arrays, we would need to
delinearize the arrays prior to graphite.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #22 from Sebastian Pop ---
Once we revert that patch, the remaining problem is that
graphite_can_represent_scev returns false on this scev:
{{(stride.12_14 + offset.13_15) + 1, +, stride.12_14}_1, +, 1}_2
the parameters are defined l
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|FIXED |---
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> There is a disconnect on how we analyze data-references during SCOP detection
> (outermost_loop is the root
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #21 from Sebastian Pop ---
Scop detection does not detect this loop because we now require the scev of the
data references to be analyzable in all the loops around:
commit e97c4b0daa932558eae4d9b9794cdd549e6d40bd
Author: rguenth
Date
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #20 from Sebastian Pop ---
-floop-nest-optimize does not have a cost model and so it blocks all loop
nests.
These two stmts are blocked:
A=0.1D0
B=0.1D0
This other stmt is not blocked:
C(I,J)=C(I,J)+A(I,K)*B(K,J)
The only thing we
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #19 from Sebastian Pop ---
Default: tile_size = 32
gfortran -ffast-math -O3 -floop-nest-optimize t.f90 -v
./a.out
176.42500110.2399826
and then with a trivial patch that replaces that default constant 3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14741
--- Comment #18 from Sebastian Pop ---
On my laptop ARM Exynos5 at 1.6GHz I get this:
gfortran -ffast-math -O3 t.f90
./a.out
192.7510.2399826
gfortran -ffast-math -O3 -fgraphite -floop-interchange -floop-block
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43396
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
gcc trunk does not depend on PPL and thus not depend on libgmpxx anymore.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48283
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51984
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44303
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47128
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54094
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43654
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49876
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49876
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-28 21:57:04
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jul 28 21:57:00 2011
New Revision: 176900
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176900
Log:
Fix PR49876: Continue code generation with integer_z
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-28
21:57:15 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jul 28 21:57:10 2011
New Revision: 176901
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176901
Log:
Fix PR48648: Handle CLAST assignments.
The CLAST p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49876
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 18:50:32
UTC ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02453.html
||2011.07.27 18:30:14
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2011.07.27 18:13:06
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 18:13:06
UTC ---
Discussion thread:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47092
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47594
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #7 fr
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 16:56:00
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45450
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 16:53:06
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jul 27 16:53:02 2011
New Revision: 176837
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176837
Log:
PR45450: disable legality check after an openscop re
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47691
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49471
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 16:53:15
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jul 27 16:53:09 2011
New Revision: 176838
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176838
Log:
Fix PR49471: canonicalize_loop_ivs should not genera
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47691
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-27 16:52:58
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Jul 27 16:52:52 2011
New Revision: 176836
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176836
Log:
Fix PR47691: do not abort compilation when code gene
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45313
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 21:07:33
UTC ---
I went to investigate this bug, and I found out that inserting
gcc_assert (graphite_legal_transform (scop));
is invalid: the legality
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44303
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 20:19:03
UTC ---
I will close this PR when the patches from Tobias will go on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01892.html
This patch-set removes support for CLooG-PPL.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
AssignedTo|spop at gcc dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48805
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 18:48:57
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:49 2011
New Revision: 176805
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176805
Log:
Fix PR47046: correct evolution_function_is_affine_p
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26
18:48:32 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:20 2011
New Revision: 176803
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176803
Log:
Add testcase for PR47593
2011-07-26 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26
18:48:19 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:48:08 2011
New Revision: 176802
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176802
Log:
Fix PR47653: do not handle loops using wrapping sem
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48805
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-26 18:47:51
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 26 18:47:44 2011
New Revision: 176801
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176801
Log:
Fix PR48805: Do not instantiate ADDR_EXPRs
With thi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47046
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 21:49:53
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02209.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47089
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||grosser at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47128
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 18:11:47
UTC ---
I will close this PR when the patches from Tobias will go on trunk:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01892.html
This patch-set removes support for CLooG-Parma.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47593
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at nitro dot
|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-25 17:46:29
UTC ---
Second attempt to fix this PR:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02061.html
at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-24 04:42:53
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02057.html
||2011.07.23 14:44:29
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||DUPLICATE
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-22 23:11:14
UTC ---
Duplicate: the only CLAST that could fall in that gcc_unreachable
is clast_assignment. The patch solving PR48648 should take care of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48648
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-22
23:11:14 UTC ---
*** Bug 49040 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
||2011.07.22 23:07:37
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-22 23:07:37
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49649
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49649
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-21 22:58:02
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jul 21 22:57:59 2011
New Revision: 176605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176605
Log:
Infer types based on lb and ub.
2011-07-21 Sebasti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-21
22:58:02 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Jul 21 22:57:59 2011
New Revision: 176605
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=176605
Log:
Infer types based on lb and ub.
2011-07-21 Sebast
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49716
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-12 16:54:49
UTC ---
trunk@176058 from Fri Jul 8 19:15:18 2011 does not ICE.
I have not tried 4.6.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49716
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-12 14:55:07
UTC ---
Please attach a preprocessed source (just add a -E option to the failing
compile line and the preprocessed source should be in math.o).
Thanks,
Sebastian
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49033
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-08 05:14:16
UTC ---
I cannot reproduce this with trunk rev. 176000
gcc version 4.7.0 20110707
Might have been fixed or hidden by this patch:
2011-06-30 Richard Guenther
PR tree-optimization/4
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49632
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46851
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
Status|UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49662
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-07 22:40:34
UTC ---
The loop nest is not perfect, in interchange-15.c:
for (i = 0; i < N; i++)
for (j = 0; j < N; j++)
x[i] += a[j][i];
used to be perfect nest, now we have x[i] read and wri
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2011-07-05 14:50:37
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Jul 5 14:50:34 2011
New Revision: 175861
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=175861
Log:
Fix PR47654: Loop blocking should strip-mine at leas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 21:18:09
UTC ---
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02283.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2011-06-29 18:44:55
UTC ---
Patch set containing the work around and the fix
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-06/msg02261.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-05-26 15:11:52
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu May 26 15:11:48 2011
New Revision: 174293
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=174293
Log:
Fix PR49147: ICE with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49147
Summary: graphite branch ICEs with -fgraphite-opencl-ignore-dep
Product: gcc
Version: lno
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assi
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #16 from Sebastian Pop 2011-04-19
16:24:44 UTC ---
The patch produces these fails on the 4.5 branch:
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ltrans-1.c scan-tree-dump-times ltrans "converted loop
nest to perfect loop nest" 1
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/ltra
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Pop 2011-04-18
16:09:49 UTC ---
The same patch applies to the 4.5 branch.
I am currently testing the patch on amd64-linux.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47127
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47127
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2011-03-12 22:05:41
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Sat Mar 12 22:05:38 2011
New Revision: 170907
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170907
Log:
Fix PR47127: call cloog_state_malloc and cloog_state
||2011.03.11 23:22:56
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-03-11 23:22:56
UTC ---
This might be a problem
||2011.03.11 21:41:26
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2011-03-11 21:41:26
UTC ---
Patch:
http
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47127
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47944
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47848
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47848
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-22 17:36:38
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 22 17:36:34 2011
New Revision: 170411
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=170411
Log:
Fix PR47848: Do not mention -ftree-loop-if-convert-m
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-18 20:42:58
UTC ---
Created attachment 23400
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23400
first patch
This patch works around the bug by undoing the transform.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47654
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-18 18:28:13
UTC ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?view=revision&revision=168211
removed all the uses of int_cst_value and replaced them with
tree_int_to_gmp, and here is what happens:
Breakpoint 5, scan_tre
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47653
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Po
||2011.02.17 00:36:38
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-17 00:36:38
UTC ---
I do not think that 0001
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46886
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-14 04:19:03
UTC ---
Patch:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-02/msg00858.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46995
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46994
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46995
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:03
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46834
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:04
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46994
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-08 16:54:03
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Feb 8 16:53:57 2011
New Revision: 169928
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=169928
Log:
Fix PRs 46834, 46994, and 46995: only rewrite reduct
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|4.6.0 |4.5.4
Target Milestone|4.5.3
||2011.02.07 06:48:14
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2011-02-07 06:48:14
UTC ---
The testcase contains a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46194
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Known to fail|4.6.0
201 - 300 of 502 matches
Mail list logo
