http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46966
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-16 20:17:43
UTC ---
The fix looks good. Please test and commit. Thanks.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-16 20:05:23
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Dec 16 20:05:18 2010
New Revision: 167954
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167954
Log:
Fix PR46404: call scev_reset to reset the number of
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 22:01:04
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 15 22:00:59 2010
New Revision: 167876
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167876
Log:
Add testcase for PR46404.
2010-12-15 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 20:44:41
UTC ---
This commit fixed the reduced testcase:
Fix PR46845: handle scop parameters before scev analysis.
2010-12-14 Sebastian Pop
PR tree-optimization/46845
* sese.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46404
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 17:55:26
UTC ---
Ok, I will have a look at that one as well.
Thanks for pointing out that this error was not fixed, but probably hidden.
at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 17:38:37
UTC ---
I cannot reproduce this error on trunk r167844.
I am running a git bisect to identify which patch fixed this PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 05:04:34
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 15 05:04:30 2010
New Revision: 167842
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167842
Log:
Fix PR45948: add ssa defs from builtin partitions to
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 05:04:52
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 15 05:04:50 2010
New Revision: 167844
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167844
Log:
Fix PR46845: handle scop parameters before scev anal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-15 05:04:43
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 15 05:04:40 2010
New Revision: 167843
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167843
Log:
Fix PR46928: handle "A[p] == A[p]" in data dep analy
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45552
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-14 19:18:56
UTC ---
Reduced testcase:
typedef struct
{
double z;
} Vector;
typedef struct
{
float *vertex;
float *normal;
} VertexArray;
typedef struct
{
Vector *vertex;
int num_vertex;
} Objec
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45552
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-14 17:24:39
UTC ---
I can see a different error than what reported:
glcells.c:846:12: internal compiler error: in chrec_component_in_loop_num, at
tree-chrec.c:758
I'm reducing the testcase using delta.
||2010.12.14 17:17:49
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-14 17:17:49
UTC ---
Mine.
I can see this ICE
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45544
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46845
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-14 07:30:07
UTC ---
Patch
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01062.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-13 19:30:19
UTC ---
The code from comment #4 comes from
./cc1 -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution -fdump-tree-ldist-details
as on -O3 we end up unrolling all the loops.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-13 18:58:41
UTC ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg01016.html
||2010.12.13 18:09:36
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-13 18:09:36
UTC ---
Mine.
BTW, this PR
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46928
Summary: data dependence analysis fails on constant array
accesses
Product: gcc
Version: 4.6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-10 23:51:22
UTC ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00919.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-10 19:49:00
UTC ---
Backport patch for 4.5
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00909.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-10 19:16:54
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Dec 10 19:16:48 2010
New Revision: 167697
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167697
Log:
Fix PR43023: fuse_partitions_with_similar_memory_acc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43023
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-09 23:54:20
UTC ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00831.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46842
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-09 00:06:51
UTC ---
I can confirm that rev165732 miscompiles tonto and rev162788 is working.
This is at -O0.
||2010.12.09 00:04:52
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|DUPLICATE |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-09 00:04:52
UTC ---
Reducing.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45370
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 23:01:46
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45231
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 23:01:46
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplace
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #22 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08
23:01:46 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 8 23:01:40 2010
New Revision: 167609
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167609
Log:
Fix PR45230, PR45231, and PR45370: fold_stmt_inplac
at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 20:43:49
UTC ---
Mine. I can reproduce this on trunk r167554 with
./cc1 -O2 -ftree-loop-distribution -m32 bug.f90
||2010.12.08 06:29:51
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 06:29:51
UTC ---
Mine. Thanks Jack for
||2010.12.08 06:26:31
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-08 06:26:31
UTC ---
Mine.
This ICE occurs on
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #20 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
23:09:22 UTC ---
Patch here:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00629.html
||2010.12.07 23:09:01
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 23:09:01
UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #19 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
19:45:19 UTC ---
With this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/sese.c b/gcc/sese.c
index 65f8556..140b16f 100644
--- a/gcc/sese.c
+++ b/gcc/sese.c
@@ -547,8 +547,8 @@ rename_uses (gimple copy, htab_t rename_map,
||2010.12.07 19:34:49
Resolution|FIXED |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #18 from Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45406
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07
16:33:03 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:32:59 2010
New Revision: 167555
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167555
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Seba
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 16:27:33
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 16:27:28 2010
New Revision: 167554
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167554
Log:
Add missing testcase for PR44676.
2010-12-07 Sebas
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42327
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42327
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 15:27:55
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:27:50 2010
New Revision: 167548
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167548
Log:
Fix PR42327: use build_int_cst.
2010-12-07 Sebasti
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 15:18:41
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Dec 7 15:18:39 2010
New Revision: 167542
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167542
Log:
Fix PR44676: fix invariant phi node removal.
Backpo
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46185
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 04:30:48
UTC ---
I forgot to add the testcase. Next time I will add it before closing the bug.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42327
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 00:35:24
UTC ---
Patch http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00540.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41562
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
||2010.12.07 00:11:20
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-07 00:11:20
UTC ---
Still fails on trunk
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46185
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44676
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.0
Version|4.6.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #13 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-02
20:13:16 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Dec 2 20:13:11 2010
New Revision: 167390
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167390
Log:
Fix PR45297: handle ADDR_EXPR in interpret_rhs_expr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-02 19:19:46
UTC ---
First patch here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2010-12/msg00216.html
However, I am not fully happy with this fix that tweaks scev const prop to work
around this bug...
The other
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45948
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-02 18:39:23
UTC ---
For this case, we end up generating two memset (0) for the first loop,
and we completely remove that loop:
void
foo (int i, int n)
{
int a[30];
int b[30];
for (; i < n; i++)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45199
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45199
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-02 16:53:21
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Dec 2 16:53:16 2010
New Revision: 167380
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167380
Log:
Fix PR45199: do not aggregate memory accesses to the
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46754
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #1
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-01
20:15:29 UTC ---
In this code:
:
q_5 = &MEM[(void *)q_1 + 4294967288B];
:
# q_1 = PHI
if (q_1 != p_2(D))
goto ;
else
goto ;
scev analysis is able to determine that q1 = {q_3, +, -8
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #6 from Sebastian Pop 2010-12-01 17:25:15
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Dec 1 17:25:10 2010
New Revision: 167348
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167348
Log:
Postpone the rewrite out of SSA to the end of the tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45199
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #10 f
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45301
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45297
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-22 23:17:35
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Mon Nov 22 23:17:25 2010
New Revision: 167060
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=167060
Log:
Postpone the rewrite out of SSA to the end of the tr
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution||FIXED
--- Comment #5 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-18 00:11:58
UTC ---
Fixed.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46422
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-18 00:10:41
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Nov 18 00:10:35 2010
New Revision: 166889
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166889
Log:
Fix PR target/46422.
2010-11-17 Quentin Neill
||2010.11.10 16:38:55
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-10 16:38:55
UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-10
16:06:51 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Wed Nov 10 16:06:47 2010
New Revision: 166544
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166544
Log:
Fix PR45971: do not predicate condition phi nodes t
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45971
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09
20:05:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 22353
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22353
patch
The attached patch solves the problem. Not yet tested other than this PR's
testcase.
at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #9 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09 20:03:22
UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09 19:23:47
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Nov 9 19:23:43 2010
New Revision: 166508
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166508
Log:
Fix PR46036.
2010-11-09 Sebastian Pop
PR tr
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314
--- Comment #12 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09
19:15:39 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Nov 9 19:15:36 2010
New Revision: 166507
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166507
Log:
Fix Changelog entry.
2010-11-09 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45314
--- Comment #11 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09
19:15:19 UTC ---
The patch fixing this has been committed with the wrong PR number on:
Author: spop
Date: Tue Nov 9 19:08:57 2010
New Revision: 166506
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45902
--- Comment #14 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-09
19:09:01 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Tue Nov 9 19:08:57 2010
New Revision: 166506
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=166506
Log:
Fix PR45314: backport revision 163123.
2010-11-09
at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-08 15:49:36
UTC ---
Mine.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-05 22:01:34
UTC ---
Created attachment 22299
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=22299
patch
Here is a patch that solves the problem.
Not tested yet.
||4.6.0
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Summary|[4.5/4.6 Regression] ICE: |[4.5 Regression] ICE:
|error: in |error: in
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46036
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Po
||2010.11.03 19:22:39
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #3 from Sebastian Pop 2010-11-03 19:22:39
UTC ---
Created attachment 22265
||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
|gnu.org |
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-30 23:02:28
UTC ---
# FLAGS="-ffast-math -funroll-loops -msse3 -O3 -ftree-vecto
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758
--- Comment #8 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-30 21:22:13
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:22:07 2010
New Revision: 164813
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164813
Log:
Fix PR45758: reset scevs before Graphite.
2010-09-2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45758
--- Comment #7 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-30 21:21:52
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:21:46 2010
New Revision: 164811
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164811
Log:
Add testcase for PR45758.
2010-09-23 Sebastian Pop
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45229
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45230
--- Comment #15 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-30
21:19:05 UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:18:59 2010
New Revision: 164791
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164791
Log:
Add testcase for PR45230.
2010-08-20 Sebastian Po
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45229
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-30 21:18:06
UTC ---
Author: spop
Date: Thu Sep 30 21:18:01 2010
New Revision: 164785
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=164785
Log:
Fix PR45229: gcc.c-torture/execute/2412-4.c ICEs
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45833
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-29 22:05:35
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> Maybe data-dependency needs to be extended for this (two references either
> identical, or non-overlapping).
Correct. Data dep analysis should not return a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45544
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop 2010-09-24 06:34:15
UTC ---
I cannot reproduce the bug.
--
Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are on the CC list for
401 - 500 of 502 matches
Mail list logo