[Bug tree-optimization/21734] [4.1 regression] ICE: -ftree-vectorize, segfault

2005-05-31 Thread stefaandr at hotmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From stefaandr at hotmail dot com 2005-05-31 10:13 --- For the sake of completeness. the error produced with the new testcase: Using built-in specs. Target: i686-pc-linux-gnu Configured with: /esat/alexandria1/sderoeck/src/gcc/main/configure --prefix=/esat

[Bug tree-optimization/21734] [4.1 regression] ICE: -ftree-vectorize, segfault

2005-05-30 Thread stefaandr at hotmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From stefaandr at hotmail dot com 2005-05-30 19:21 --- confirmed, I cannot reproduce with the given testcase either. But my original source code still triggers a (possibly the same) bug. I've extracted a new testcase: struct M { double data[16]; d

[Bug tree-optimization/21734] New: ICE: -ftree-vectorize, segfault

2005-05-24 Thread stefaandr at hotmail dot com
Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: stefaandr at hotmail dot com CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21734

[Bug c++/19320] static const float initialization ignored

2005-01-07 Thread stefaandr at hotmail dot com
--- Additional Comments From stefaandr at hotmail dot com 2005-01-07 23:31 --- If accepting floats just as integers is an extension, then why does the same code compile without problems when using integers? (Static integer constants also need a memory location right? Or don't

[Bug c++/19320] New: static const float initialization ignored

2005-01-07 Thread stefaandr at hotmail dot com
ld returned 1 exit status -- Summary: static const float initialization ignored Product: gcc Version: 4.0.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org