[Bug c/34762] [4.2 regression] internal compiler error: in delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:7958

2008-01-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2008-01-12 20:54 --- Created an attachment (id=14931) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14931&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34762

[Bug c/34762] New: [4.2 regression] internal compiler error: in delete_output_reload, at reload1.c:7958

2008-01-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34762

[Bug rtl-optimization/17264] [hppa] Missing address increment optimization for fp load/stores

2006-09-24 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #4 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-09-24 23:49 --- Fixed in gcc-4.x -- tausq at debian dot org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/26957] [4.0/4.1/4.2 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

2006-09-08 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #13 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-09-08 15:04 --- Works for me on the original test case (ACE package) and on the reduced test case in #3. Tested on hppa-linux native. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957

[Bug c++/28620] [4.1 regression] static const member in template class leads to multiple definitions at linktime

2006-08-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-08-06 10:07 --- Created an attachment (id=12026) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=12026&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620

[Bug c++/28620] New: [4.1 regression] static const member in template class leads to multiple definitions at linktime

2006-08-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
t org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28620

[Bug c++/26957] [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 23:52 --- Created an attachment (id=11171) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11171&action=view) Testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26957

[Bug c++/26957] New: [4.0 regression] ICE in make_decl_rtl, at varasm.c:871

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
gcc Version: 4.0.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-u

[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 16:31 --- The code is valid syntactically, but there is actually a bug. the longoptions array only has 3 elements, but we try to fill in 4 entries. if we make the longoptions array bigger than it doesn't cause the ICE. --

[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-30 16:28 --- Created an attachment (id=11167) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11167&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26945

[Bug rtl-optimization/26945] New: [3.4/4.0/4.1 regression] Attempt to delete prologue/epilogue insn

2006-03-30 Thread tausq at debian dot org
: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown

[Bug debug/24943] [hppa64] Bad dwarf output using non-preserved base register

2006-03-19 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #5 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-20 02:34 --- Indeed, as Dave said this is a different and not yet fixed problem. -- tausq at debian dot org changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug target/26743] gcc generates unreachable branch

2006-03-19 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #3 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-19 15:52 --- I think this is a bit different, the bit of code that causes the problem is: 339796 .loc 1 38663 0 339797 or,<> %r28,%r0,%r3 339798 b .L25049 339799 copy %r4,%r19 This bit of c

[Bug target/26743] gcc generates unreachable branch

2006-03-18 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-03-18 10:14 --- Created an attachment (id=11066) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=11066&action=view) testcase -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26743

[Bug target/26743] New: gcc generates unreachable branch

2006-03-18 Thread tausq at debian dot org
: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26743

[Bug debug/26330] New: gcc generates code that does not allow retrieval of struct arguments with debugger

2006-02-16 Thread tausq at debian dot org
ty: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26330

[Bug target/26255] [4.0 regression] internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

2006-02-14 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #6 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-02-15 05:50 --- Will this go into the 4.0 branch too? -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26255

[Bug target/26255] [4.0 regression] internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

2006-02-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2006-02-13 05:13 --- I forgot to mention that this bug does not happen with the 20060104 snapshot of gcc-4.0_branch (Debian 4.0.2-6), only with 20060128 (Debian 4.0.2-8) -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26255

[Bug target/26255] New: [3.3 regression] internal compiler error: in reload_cse_simplify_operands, at postreload.c:391

2006-02-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
_operands, at postreload.c:391 Product: gcc Version: 4.0.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet:

[Bug debug/24943] [hppa64] Bad dwarf output using non-preserved base register

2005-12-07 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 from tausq at debian dot org 2005-12-08 05:26 --- Some discussion about this PR is here: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-11/msg01563.html -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24943

[Bug debug/25258] [4.0 regression/hpux] gcc generates incorrect stabs debug output

2005-12-05 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #2 from tausq at debian dot org 2005-12-06 05:47 --- I'm guessing this is the patch that introduced this regression: 2004-08-20 Zack Weinberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John David Anglin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * config/pa/pa-protos

[Bug debug/25258] [4.0 regression/hpux] gcc generates incorrect stabs debug output

2005-12-05 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2005-12-06 05:38 --- The difference is that gcc-3.x creates: .proc .callinfo xxx .entry ... .exit .procend .space $TEXT$ .nsubspa $CODE$,QUAD=0,ALIGN=8,ACCESS=44,CODE_ONLY .stabs "",100,0,0,L$text_end L$text_end: w

[Bug debug/25258] New: [4.0 regression/hpux] gcc generates incorrect stabs debug output

2005-12-04 Thread tausq at debian dot org
ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 GCC host triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 GCC target triplet: hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25258

[Bug debug/24943] [hppa64] Bad dwarf output using non-preserved base register

2005-11-19 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Comment #1 from tausq at debian dot org 2005-11-20 03:38 --- I forgot to mention that the above was compiled with gcc -g -o dwarfbug dwarfbug.c -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24943

[Bug debug/24943] New: [hppa64] Bad dwarf output using non-preserved base register

2005-11-19 Thread tausq at debian dot org
Version: 4.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org GCC build triplet: hppa64-hp-hpux11.11 GCC host triplet: hppa64-hp-hpu

[Bug middle-end/23369] [4.0/4.1 regression] build_range_check generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-14 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-08-15 05:31 --- Do I understand correctly that there are two distinct problems: 1) gcc should not be canonicalizing constants casted as function pointers 2) gcc should not generate relational comparisons against function

[Bug rtl-optimization/23369] [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-08-13 03:46 --- Created an attachment (id=9488) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9488&action=view) Preprocessed source -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23369

[Bug rtl-optimization/23369] [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-08-13 03:08 --- The line of code in question is: 51 if (old == SIG_IGN || old == SIG_DFL || old == SIG_ERR) after preprocessing, this becomes if (old == ((__sighandler_t) 1) || old == ((__sighandler_t

[Bug rtl-optimization/23369] [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Known to fail||4.0.1 Known to work|

[Bug rtl-optimization/23369] [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-08-13 02:51 --- Created an attachment (id=9487) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=9487&action=view) Testcase Compile with gcc -O2 -S -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23369

[Bug rtl-optimization/23369] New: [4.0.x regression] Generates wrong code for funcptr comparison

2005-08-12 Thread tausq at debian dot org
rtl-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzi

[Bug middle-end/22051] [4.0/4.1 regression] Wrong code for function pointer comparision during optimization

2005-06-13 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2005-06-13 16:23 --- this is what you get with gcc-3.3: .LC0: .stringz"main" .section.rodata.cst4,"aM",@progbits,4 .align 4 .LC1: .word P%main [...] ldil LR'.LC

[Bug tree-optimization/22051] [4.0 regression/hppa-linux] Wrong code for function pointer comparision during optimization

2005-06-13 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to fail||4.0.0 Known to work||3.3.5 Summary|[4.0 regression] Wrong code |[4

[Bug tree-optimization/22051] New: [4.0 regression] Wrong code for function pointer comparision during optimization

2005-06-13 Thread tausq at debian dot org
Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: tree-optimization AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linu

[Bug debug/18856] [3.3 only, regression] Missing .loc information after prologue

2004-12-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to work|3.4.2 |3.0.4 3.4.2 Summary|[3.3 only] Missing .loc |[3.3 only, regression] |informat

[Bug debug/18856] Missing .loc information after prologue

2004-12-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added Known to work||3.4.2 http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18856

[Bug debug/18856] Missing .loc information after prologue

2004-12-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2004-12-06 18:50 --- Created an attachment (id=7692) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7692&action=view) test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18856

[Bug debug/18856] New: Missing .loc information after prologue

2004-12-06 Thread tausq at debian dot org
: debug AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org GCC build triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC host triplet: hppa-unknown-linux GCC target triplet: hppa-unknown-linux http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla

[Bug target/18509] [3.3 only] [hppa] try-catch program fails when compiled with frame pointers

2004-11-15 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2004-11-16 00:55 --- (In reply to comment #3) > I don't believe there have been any specific changes to the backend > with respect to exception support since 3.3.0. 3.0 didn't have dwarf2 > EH support. There poss

[Bug c++/18509] [hppa] try-catch program fails when compiled with frame pointers

2004-11-15 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2004-11-16 00:07 --- Created an attachment (id=7550) --> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=7550&action=view) Test case -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18509

[Bug c++/18509] New: [hppa] try-catch program fails when compiled with frame pointers

2004-11-15 Thread tausq at debian dot org
with frame pointers Product: gcc Version: 3.3.5 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P2 Component: c++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: tausq at debian dot org

[Bug middle-end/17564] [4.0 Regression] New treatment of function pointers when used with equality operators

2004-11-10 Thread tausq at debian dot org
-- What|Removed |Added CC||tausq at debian dot org http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17564

[Bug debug/15860] [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] No DW_AT_location debug info is emitted for formal arguments to a function that uses "register" qualifiers

2004-10-13 Thread tausq at debian dot org
--- Additional Comments From tausq at debian dot org 2004-10-13 21:24 --- Verified with gcc-3.4.1 and gdb-6.2.1 on hppa-linux. Thanks Richard. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15860