[Bug sanitizer/106558] ASan failed to detect a global-buffer-overflow

2022-11-21 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558 --- Comment #17 from Yuri Gribov --- Fix has been approved (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-November/606858.html), I hope to merge it soon.

[Bug sanitizer/106558] ASan failed to detect a global-buffer-overflow

2022-09-13 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558 --- Comment #13 from Yuri Gribov --- Posted to gcc-patches: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-September/601041.html

[Bug sanitizer/106558] ASan failed to detect a global-buffer-overflow

2022-08-23 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558 --- Comment #11 from Yuri Gribov --- Created attachment 53493 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53493&action=edit Updated patch Here is an updated patch which passes bootstrap-asan (I haven't run the testsuite yet). It resul

[Bug sanitizer/106558] ASan failed to detect a global-buffer-overflow

2022-08-11 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558 --- Comment #8 from Yuri Gribov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) I've started work on this but I'll probly only have enough time to cook a patch on weekend. > Perhaps either a quick check that for base ptrs that live in memory

[Bug sanitizer/106558] ASan failed to detect a global-buffer-overflow

2022-08-10 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #5

[Bug libgomp/103276] New: [openacc] Trying to map already mapped data

2021-11-16 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103276 Bug ID: 103276 Summary: [openacc] Trying to map already mapped data Product: gcc Version: og11 (devel/omp/gcc-11) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug middle-end/95550] [OpenACC] ICE in expand_oacc_for, at omp-expand.c:6075

2021-09-28 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95550 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Gribov --- The promised repro: SUBROUTINE FOO() INTEGER :: I COMPLEX(8), ALLOCATABLE :: GWORK(:) ALLOCATE(GWORK(512)) !$ACC PARALLEL LOOP PRIVA

[Bug fortran/93554] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_oacc_for, at omp-expand.c:6035 since r6-4364-ge4834818d22f5c66

2021-09-28 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93554 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/95550] [OpenACC] ICE in expand_oacc_for, at omp-expand.c:6075

2021-09-28 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95550 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug ipa/102310] [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis with OpenACC

2021-09-14 Thread tetra2005 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310 Yuri Gribov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tetra2005 at gmail dot com --- Comment #4