--- Comment #11 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-09-06 21:13 ---
Subject: Re: Wrong code for SPREAD on zero-sized
arrays
Hi Toon,
--- Comment #8 from toon at moene dot indiv dot nluug dot nl 2007-09-06
08:56 ---
Wouldn't it be an option to simply bail out
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-08-01 17:46 ---
Subject: Re: mask and -fdefault-integer-8
On Wed, 2007-08-01 at 15:36 +, dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr wrote:
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at lps dot ens dot fr 2007-08-01 15:36
---
I have had
--- Comment #5 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-05-29 17:47 ---
Subject: Re: knowing that stride==1 when using
allocated arrays and escaping allocatable arrays
On Tue, 2007-05-29 at 04:52 +, pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:
we think we change a's stride
which
--- Comment #7 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-31 08:11 ---
Subject: Re: Last record truncated for read after short
write, direct access file
On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 00:45 +, jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu dot org
wrote:
Michael sent me this excellent test case
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 21:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=13278)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13278action=view)
proposed patch
This should fix it.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31196
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 22:17 ---
This is a bug in the test case.
I'll commit a correct version.
Thomas
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31297
--- Comment #2 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 22:44 ---
Created an attachment (id=13279)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13279action=view)
patch for the test cases
All but one of these were errors in the test cases, which are
corrected with this patch
--- Comment #3 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-24 23:07 ---
Created an attachment (id=13280)
-- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13280action=view)
proposed patch
This one also fixes the last case.
It does so by reading size bytes instead of the kind number
--- Comment #1 from tkoenig at alice-dsl dot net 2007-03-23 20:14 ---
The eoshift.f90 case is 'mostly harmless'. We are doing calculations
with the value, but don't actually use this for anything.
We can fix this (cosmetic fix for valgrind, really) by
setting sstride[0] to an arbitray
