https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Jul 19 21:25:33 2016
New Revision: 238497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-19 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71902
* dependen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded |[5/6 Regression] Unneeded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Fri Jul 22 10:38:32 2016
New Revision: 238638
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238638&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-22 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71795
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
@Paul: Here is a suggestion.
Feel free to use / modify / whatever this, I will not be
able to submit a patch for the next two weeks or so.
Index: frontend-passes.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71883
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Not quite as radical, but could also help avoid quite a few
errors in front-end optimization:
ndex: frontend-passes.c
===
--- frontend-passes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Pat Haugen from comment #4)
> r238497 causes a miscompare for CPU2000 benchmark 178.galgel on powerpc64.
> Continuing to dig, will post more details as I find out.
This is tracked as PR 71961.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
If there is a bug, it is likely an array dependence that
is mishandled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-07-21 00:00:00 |
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to James Greenhalgh from comment #7)
> Reducing it would probably prove hard as the bug is a miscompile and
> therefore only shows at runtime in a >30 second test. H.J. has narrowed the
> miscompil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 7 13:24:32 2016
New Revision: 239220
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239220&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71961
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71961
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 7 15:25:56 2016
New Revision: 239221
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239221&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71961
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression] ICE in |[6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 7 15:40:34 2016
New Revision: 239222
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239222&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70040
Corrected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 7 15:56:25 2016
New Revision: 239223
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239223&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70040
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6 Regression] ICE in |[5 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Aug 7 17:01:39 2016
New Revision: 239224
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239224&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71795
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] Two Bugs |[5 Regression] Two Bugs in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65677
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Ass> cat a.f90
program main
character(:), allocatable :: text
text = 'asdf'
text = adjustl(text(2:))
print *,text
end program main
ig25@linux-fd1f:~/Krempel/Ass> gfortran a.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 8 06:29:16 2016
New Revision: 239229
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239229&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/70040
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 70040, which changed state.
Bug 70040 Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in gimplify.c with deferred-length strings
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70040
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Aug 8 22:00:37 2016
New Revision: 239259
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239259&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-08 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60526
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Aug 9 06:28:57 2016
New Revision: 239271
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239271&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-09 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69742
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] Unneeded |[5/6/7 Regression] Unneeded
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Aug 9 20:33:00 2016
New Revision: 239302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-09 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
All of these ICEs are now gone with r238822.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed with r238822.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #2)
> Author: burnus
> Date: Mon Jun 20 18:46:43 2016
> New Revision: 237612
This fixed it, closing.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
This no longer ICEs, probably after r238822 .
Closing as fixed.
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
The ICE is gone with r238822.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
No longer ICEs with r238822.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69859
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still many invalid reads using valgrind:
Error: Fortran 2003: PROCEDURE statement at (1)
==13422== Invalid read of size 8
==13422==at 0x6B2540: gfc_sym_get_dummy_args(gfc_symbol*) (symbol.c:4662)
==13422
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-02-13 00:00:00 |2016-8-9
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
This is fixed on trunk and 6-branch (so it will be in the
next release). 5-branch still to do.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Aug 13 15:04:04 2016
New Revision: 239445
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239445&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-13 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 68147, which changed state.
Bug 68147 Summary: Potential incorrect code generation for string
self-assignment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
In order to aid optimization, it could be beneficial to
build libgfortran as an lto-enabled library. There could be
a big win for functions being called via constant propagation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Also fails with 5.4.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's a test case which shows a performance loss with LTO-enabled
libgfortran.
program main
implicit none
integer, parameter :: n=10**7
integer :: i
real, dimension(n) :: a
real :: t1, t2, t3
ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77278
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Some information about the type mismatch.
The first mismatch about gfortran_st_write is
lto1: warning: type of '_gfortran_st_write' does not match original declaration
[-Wlto-type-mismatch]
Breakpoint 1, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77296
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77351
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Hi steve,
> Thou shalt not derefernce NULL pointers.
Correct.
The patch is pre-approved (alternatively, it could be
considered obvious and simple).
Thanks!
Regards
Thomas
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Still an issue:
#include
#include
int main()
{
float complex c,d;
foo(&c);
d=1.0f/c;
return creal(d)+cimag(d)<0;
}
Using -fcx-fortran-rules yields (from the optimized dump)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22041
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-03-17 12:00:00 |2016-8-30
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49232
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
Straightforward patch:
Index: expr.c
===
--- expr.c (Revision 239218)
+++ expr.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -3764,6 +3764,45 @@
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71902
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Sep 4 16:17:55 2016
New Revision: 239977
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239977&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71902
* frontend
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Original bug report from John Urban, from
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-09/msg00015.html
program testit
imp
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
The following program segfaults:
subroutine foo(a,from,to)
integer :: from, to
real, dimension(from:to) :: a
from = from + 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77560
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 77560, which changed state.
Bug 77560 Summary: Redefinition of lower bound in explicit-shape dummy argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77560
What|Removed |Added
---
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Component|fortran |bootstrap
Host||x86_64-unknown-cygwin
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|configure-target-libgfortra |[7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Tim, can you grab a clean copy of trunk (from a Linux box or from whereever),
cooy that to your Windows machine and try again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
||2016-09-26
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|INVALID |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Helmut Schellong from comment #6)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Please see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#need for the things that
are required for a bug report.
Specifically,
the preprocessed file (*.i*) that triggers the bug, generated by adding
-save-temps to the complet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
> In this case a lot of informations are not necessary.
Those bug reporting guidelines are there for a reason:
To make it easier for developers (whose time is very
limited) to quickly reproduce bugs.
Witho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27077
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38592
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
We still do the comparison, although with memcmp now.
More interesting question is if we could/should do
forward propagation of values in the front end,
or if this is something that the middle-end should,
in
||2016-10-10
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
Summary|Internal error for matmul() |[6/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77915
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Oct 10 14:54:26 2016
New Revision: 240928
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240928&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/77915
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77915
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Oct 16 18:16:29 2016
New Revision: 241217
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241217&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-10-16 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77915
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
See the discussion starting at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-04/msg00128.html
.
Basically, for code like
ZQICE(1:NPROMA,1:NFLEVG) = PGFL(1:NPROMA,1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Can you provide a testcase that can be compiled?
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here it is. The internal writes are there just to confuse the
optimizer.
module x
implicit none
contains
subrouti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85531
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
What is the best strategy on this?
I assume the Fortran front end could do a dependency analysis,
the existing code could be extended for this.
We could then either do the scalarization in the front end, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83224
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 85581 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85581
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed||2018-05-02
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Thomas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue May 8 07:47:19 2018
New Revision: 260023
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260023&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-08 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/54613
* check.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54613
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu May 10 14:31:54 2018
New Revision: 260116
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=260116&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-05-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/54613
* intrins
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
It is working as (currently) designed.
To quote from the description:
`-Wdo-subscript'
Warn if an array subscript inside a DO loop could lead
: middle-end
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
There is a problem with loops determining the maximum (or minimum)
of a value. I noticed this when looking at inline code generated
by gfortran for maxloc/minloc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> These functions are not functional equivalent.
>
> In the b.c, it records the max location but it is the last element which
> contains that value. While in c.c,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #8)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #7)
> > Confirmed with a Haswell CPU as well. Without the __builtin_expect we
> > rightfully predict the branch to be 50%
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85740
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 44121
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=44121&action=edit
Test case for vectorizing, inc. assembly
This test case, written by Nicolas König, shows a proof of concept fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
> Well, that was absolutely not my intention when I opened this PR, and it
> still isn't. Quite the opposite: I don't think gfortran should apply more
> optimizations, but less. I'm changing the title and k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
--- Comment #25 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to janus from comment #23)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #21)
> > If we make guarantees that the standard does not, we will be
> > creating our own language
>
> I certainly don't want
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85599
--- Comment #27 from Thomas Koenig ---
[Replying to myself now]
> A front end pass (what else did you expect? :-)
>
> If an impure function is found (recursively) in the operands of an .AND.
> expression, issue a
>
> gfc_warning(OPT_Wsurprisin
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
This looks good:
--- frontend-passes.c (Revision 261245)
+++ frontend-passes.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -57,6 +57,8 @@ static bool has_dimen_vector_ref (gfc_expr *);
static int matmul_temp_args (gfc_code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Jun 6 21:41:29 2018
New Revision: 261248
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261248&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85641
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 7 17:33:44 2018
New Revision: 261285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85641
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 7 18:13:33 2018
New Revision: 261289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=261289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2018-06-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/85641
Backport f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68241
Bug 68241 depends on bug 85641, which changed state.
Bug 85641 Summary: [7/8/9 Regression] ICE with string concatenate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85641
What|Removed |Added
-
1 - 100 of 1385 matches
Mail list logo
