https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89987
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54880
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 6 22:10:28 2019
New Revision: 270184
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270184=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-04-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87352
* gfortran.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89981
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[8/9 Regression] gfortran |[8 Regression] gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89981
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Apr 6 14:16:01 2019
New Revision: 270182
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270182=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-04-06 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/89981
* resolve.c
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89981
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Reduced test case:
program main
call bar(i)
end program main
subroutine foo
entry bar(i)
end subroutine foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #20)
> Sometimes life can be easy.
>
> We need to make -fzero-initialized-in-bss the default for
> gfortran.
Actually, no. I checked with a wrong version of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89904
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #20 from Thomas Koenig ---
Sometimes life can be easy.
We need to make -fzero-initialized-in-bss the default for
gfortran.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #19 from Thomas Koenig ---
Unfortunately, this patch
Index: class.c
===
--- class.c (Revision 269895)
+++ class.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -911,6 +911,9 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #18 from Thomas Koenig ---
Or see https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-04/msg2.html .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #17 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #16)
> A shorter reproducer:
which results in the assembly file
.file "types-2.f90"
.text
.globl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
A shorter reproducer:
$ cat types-2.f90
module TYPES_MODULE
implicit none
type archive_type
character(2**18) :: root_name
end type archive_type
end module TYPES_MODULE
$ gfortran -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #14)
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-03/msg01478.html
> might also cure this one, without source I cannot tell.
No, it does not help.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35276
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46590
--- Comment #48 from Thomas Koenig ---
The test case from comment#5 and comment#6 has regressed for M7/8/9:
$ time gfortran-4.8 -O1 gener-4.f90
real0m11.509s
user0m11.356s
sys 0m0.148s
$ time gfortran-7 -O1 gener-4.f90
real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80960
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
With -O2, the combiner takes up quite a lot of time:
$ time gfortran -ftime-report -g0 -O2 -fdefault-integer-8 -c fe_objective.f90
alias stmt walking : 15.75 ( 4%) 0.11 ( 5%) 15.89
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42958
--- Comment #26 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #25)
> > If you find anything still missing in the library, please let me know.
> > I thought I had converted everything to the macros, which are fairly
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84487
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #10)
> This patch
>
> Index: class.c
> ===
> --- class.c (Revision 269895)
> +++ class.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
This patch
Index: class.c
===
--- class.c (Revision 269895)
+++ class.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@ -1031,11 +1031,13 @@ finalize_component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87352
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
I think this is a high-priority bug that we should try to fix
before the GCC 9 release.
Some discussion here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2019-03/msg00124.html
Jeremy, you mentioned that you commented
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87946
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
There are quite a few places where we access memory in rejected
statements. This should be a place to gather them.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89646
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89866
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 89866, which changed state.
Bug 89866 Summary: [8 Regression] [F08] wrong-code problem with POINTER,
INTENT(IN) argument
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89866
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89866
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 30 13:45:47 2019
New Revision: 270035
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270035=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/89866
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89866
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 30 13:41:10 2019
New Revision: 270034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270034=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/89866
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89866
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 30 13:23:38 2019
New Revision: 270032
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=270032=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-30 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78865
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85686
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #4)
> Any update on this one, that should possibly be not so hard to fix I'd guess.
A combination of character, associate, and arrays?
How many hoenest's nests do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
--- Comment #16 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #15)
> Based on c#14 this seems most likely like a Fortran FE issue, right?
Certainly looks like it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Rather than create a new compiler option, it is possible to compile to an
assembler
file using -S, look for .ascii „bar/foo.f90\0“ and replace with a sed or perl
script
according to your specification (for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50410
--- Comment #34 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #2)
> The following produces a Segmentation fault in gfc_conv_structure (r178925)
>
> type t
>integer g
> end type
> type(t) :: u=t(1)
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89830
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|fortran
Summary|[7/8/9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
r237104 fails for me, testing r237008.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Bisecting this leads to
/home/ig25/Gcc/Bisect-bin/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/ig25/Gcc/Bisect-bin/./gcc/ -xc -S
-c /dev/null -fself-test
../../Bisect/gcc/input.c:1154: FAIL: ASSERT_STREQ (exp_filename,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> The test works for me with 4.8.5. The change occurred between revisions
> r2370089 (2016-06-04, OK) and r237310 + one patch (2016-06-10, wrong code).
The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85537
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82721
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 24 12:51:19 2019
New Revision: 269895
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269895=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-24 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78865
* interface.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89574
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37131
Bug 37131 depends on bug 68009, which changed state.
Bug 68009 Summary: [7/8 Regression] prototype for gfortran_runtime_error with
inline matmul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 23 16:01:57 2019
New Revision: 269890
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269890=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68009
Backport from trunk
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 23 15:58:25 2019
New Revision: 269889
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269889=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68009
Backport from trunk
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77504
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.5
Summary|"is used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68009
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 18 17:35:54 2019
New Revision: 269769
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269769=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-18 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68009
* iresolve.c:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #6 from Thomas
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Fixed, closing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88008
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Mar 18 07:28:42 2019
New Revision: 269750
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269750=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/88008
* gfortran.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71861
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78865
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 17 12:54:29 2019
New Revision: 269741
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269741=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84394
Backport from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 17 12:45:33 2019
New Revision: 269740
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269740=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-17 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84394
Backport from trunk
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #40 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 14:03:00 2019
New Revision: 269725
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269725=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66089
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #39 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:52:19 2019
New Revision: 269724
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269724=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66089
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32630
Bug 32630 depends on bug 66695, which changed state.
Bug 66695 Summary: [7/8 Regression] [F03] ICE with binding-name equal to the
name of a use-associated procedure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:24:40 2019
New Revision: 269723
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269723=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 13:16:11 2019
New Revision: 269722
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269722=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84394
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Mar 16 11:50:03 2019
New Revision: 269721
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269721=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-16 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/84394
* symbol.c
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
Summary|[7/8 Regression] compiler |[7/8/9 Regression] compiler
|error when using modules|error when using modules
|with derived types in block |with derived types in block
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #13 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 22:15:33 2019
New Revision: 269666
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269666=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87673
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 22:05:59 2019
New Revision: 269665
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269665=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87673
Backport from
||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution|--- |INVALID
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Khang H. Nguyen from comment #0)
> For this bug I report, I report two bugs. One could be a potential bug while
> the other should for cer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79485
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Wed Mar 13 07:21:33 2019
New Revision: 269635
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269635=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-13 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66695
PR fortran/77746
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jürgen Reuter from comment #9)
> Sorry if that maybe a stupid question but is it wise that close before the
> new release to start such a bigger coding?
Well, it turned out to be much less
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #11 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Mar 12 17:22:28 2019
New Revision: 269624
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269624=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-12 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/87673
* match.c
||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
||a/show_bug.cgi?id=77746
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
Created attachment 45946
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=45946=edit
First step towards a patch
Expect quite a few regressions, but this seems to do the
trick for this PR and PR 77746 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66695
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
gfc_verify_binding_labels seems strange.
First, I am not sure what to make of
/* Verify that any binding labels used in a given namespace do not collide
with the names or binding labels of any global
at gcc dot gnu.org |tkoenig at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #9)
> This "fixes" this PR, of course bringing back
> the original problem (PR82049).
Or rather, not bringing it back. I assume that
one of Harald
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
This "fixes" this PR, of course bringing back
the original problem (PR82049).
Index: match.c
===
--- match.c (Revision 269552)
+++ match.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #8 from Thomas Koenig ---
> No ICE with r257407+2 patches (2018-02-06), ICE with r257500+3 patches
> (2018-02-08).
Bisection shows that r257459 fails, r257458 works. This also
makes sense because r257459 deals with that general
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig ---
Trying some bisection.
r257267 was ok, r258291 showed the is_illegal_recursion bug and
also shows the error with that removed.
To be continued...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
A better traceback. Part of this seems to be a use after free
problem:
=5863== Invalid read of size 1
==5863==at 0x8FEEB4: resolve_elemental_actual(gfc_expr*, gfc_code*)
(resolve.c:2160)
==5863==by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #38 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #36)
> Revision r269549 causes
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/assumed_type_2.f90 -O0 scan-tree-dump-times original
> "sub_array_assumed (D" 3
> the 'struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66089
--- Comment #37 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Mar 10 14:21:34 2019
New Revision: 269555
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=269555=gcc=rev
Log:
2019-03-10 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/66089
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87673
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Running f951 under valgrind, we get with current trunk (r269549):
==27666== Memcheck, a memory error detector
==27666== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al.
==27666== Using
1101 - 1200 of 3581 matches
Mail list logo
